美国国债市场流动性的最优测度和驱动因素:低流动性会成为新常态吗?

D. Sarkar, J. Younger
{"title":"美国国债市场流动性的最优测度和驱动因素:低流动性会成为新常态吗?","authors":"D. Sarkar, J. Younger","doi":"10.3905/jot.2015.10.3.057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent bouts of volatility in the Treasury market, exacerbated by stubbornly depressed liquidity, have caught the attention of a large number of market participants. In this article, the authors compare several popular measures of U.S. Treasury market liquidity and attempt to identify the driving forces behind the recent decline. Their analysis shows that Treasury market depth is the best measure of liquidity, as it has historically done an excellent job in forecasting volatility and is conceptually more appealing than other popular measures, such as bid–ask spreads and trading volume. Although uncertainty regarding the path of U.S. monetary policy has been partly responsible for the recent decline in liquidity, the authors suggest that structural changes in the marketplace have helped aggravate the situation. Increasingly active queue management has led market makers to withdraw liquidity in times of heightened volatility, and regulatory constraints have restricted dealers’ ability to provide liquidity, because they are incentivized to hold smaller inventories than in the past and are generally more risk averse.","PeriodicalId":254660,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Trading","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimal Measure and Drivers of U.S. Treasury Market (Il)Liquidity: Will Low Liquidity Be the New Normal?\",\"authors\":\"D. Sarkar, J. Younger\",\"doi\":\"10.3905/jot.2015.10.3.057\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Recent bouts of volatility in the Treasury market, exacerbated by stubbornly depressed liquidity, have caught the attention of a large number of market participants. In this article, the authors compare several popular measures of U.S. Treasury market liquidity and attempt to identify the driving forces behind the recent decline. Their analysis shows that Treasury market depth is the best measure of liquidity, as it has historically done an excellent job in forecasting volatility and is conceptually more appealing than other popular measures, such as bid–ask spreads and trading volume. Although uncertainty regarding the path of U.S. monetary policy has been partly responsible for the recent decline in liquidity, the authors suggest that structural changes in the marketplace have helped aggravate the situation. Increasingly active queue management has led market makers to withdraw liquidity in times of heightened volatility, and regulatory constraints have restricted dealers’ ability to provide liquidity, because they are incentivized to hold smaller inventories than in the past and are generally more risk averse.\",\"PeriodicalId\":254660,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Trading\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Trading\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3905/jot.2015.10.3.057\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Trading","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3905/jot.2015.10.3.057","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于流动性持续低迷,美国国债市场最近几轮的波动引起了大量市场参与者的注意。在本文中,作者比较了几种常用的美国国债市场流动性指标,并试图找出近期下跌背后的驱动因素。他们的分析显示,美国国债市场深度是衡量流动性的最佳指标,因为从历史上看,它在预测波动性方面表现出色,而且在概念上比买卖价差和交易量等其他常用指标更有吸引力。尽管美国货币政策路径的不确定性是近期流动性下降的部分原因,但作者认为,市场的结构性变化加剧了这种情况。越来越活跃的排队管理导致做市商在市场波动加剧时撤回流动性,而监管约束也限制了交易商提供流动性的能力,因为他们持有的库存比过去更少,而且普遍更厌恶风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Optimal Measure and Drivers of U.S. Treasury Market (Il)Liquidity: Will Low Liquidity Be the New Normal?
Recent bouts of volatility in the Treasury market, exacerbated by stubbornly depressed liquidity, have caught the attention of a large number of market participants. In this article, the authors compare several popular measures of U.S. Treasury market liquidity and attempt to identify the driving forces behind the recent decline. Their analysis shows that Treasury market depth is the best measure of liquidity, as it has historically done an excellent job in forecasting volatility and is conceptually more appealing than other popular measures, such as bid–ask spreads and trading volume. Although uncertainty regarding the path of U.S. monetary policy has been partly responsible for the recent decline in liquidity, the authors suggest that structural changes in the marketplace have helped aggravate the situation. Increasingly active queue management has led market makers to withdraw liquidity in times of heightened volatility, and regulatory constraints have restricted dealers’ ability to provide liquidity, because they are incentivized to hold smaller inventories than in the past and are generally more risk averse.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信