通过边缘移除阻止简单和复杂的传染

C. Kuhlman, Gaurav Tuli, S. Swarup, M. Marathe, S. Ravi
{"title":"通过边缘移除阻止简单和复杂的传染","authors":"C. Kuhlman, Gaurav Tuli, S. Swarup, M. Marathe, S. Ravi","doi":"10.1109/ICDM.2013.47","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Eliminating interactions among individuals is an important means of blocking contagion spread, e.g., closing schools during an epidemic or shutting down electronic communication channels during social unrest. We study contagion blocking in networked populations by identifying edges to remove from a network, thus blocking contagion transmission pathways. We formulate various problems to minimize contagion spread and show that some are efficiently solvable while others are formally hard. We also compare our hardness results to those from node blocking problems and show interesting differences between the two. Our main problem is not only hard, but also has no approximation guarantee, unless P=NP. Therefore, we devise a heuristic for the problem and compare its performance to state-of-the-art heuristics from the literature. We show, through results of 12 (network, heuristic) combinations on three real social networks, that our method offers considerable improvement in the ability to block contagions in weighted and unweighted networks. We also conduct a parametric study to understand the limitations of our approach.","PeriodicalId":308676,"journal":{"name":"2013 IEEE 13th International Conference on Data Mining","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"84","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Blocking Simple and Complex Contagion by Edge Removal\",\"authors\":\"C. Kuhlman, Gaurav Tuli, S. Swarup, M. Marathe, S. Ravi\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICDM.2013.47\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Eliminating interactions among individuals is an important means of blocking contagion spread, e.g., closing schools during an epidemic or shutting down electronic communication channels during social unrest. We study contagion blocking in networked populations by identifying edges to remove from a network, thus blocking contagion transmission pathways. We formulate various problems to minimize contagion spread and show that some are efficiently solvable while others are formally hard. We also compare our hardness results to those from node blocking problems and show interesting differences between the two. Our main problem is not only hard, but also has no approximation guarantee, unless P=NP. Therefore, we devise a heuristic for the problem and compare its performance to state-of-the-art heuristics from the literature. We show, through results of 12 (network, heuristic) combinations on three real social networks, that our method offers considerable improvement in the ability to block contagions in weighted and unweighted networks. We also conduct a parametric study to understand the limitations of our approach.\",\"PeriodicalId\":308676,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2013 IEEE 13th International Conference on Data Mining\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"84\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2013 IEEE 13th International Conference on Data Mining\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDM.2013.47\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 IEEE 13th International Conference on Data Mining","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDM.2013.47","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 84

摘要

消除个人之间的互动是阻止传染病传播的重要手段,例如,在流行病期间关闭学校或在社会动荡期间关闭电子通信渠道。我们通过识别边缘以从网络中移除来研究网络人群中的传染阻断,从而阻断传染传播途径。我们提出了各种各样的问题,以尽量减少传染的传播,并表明一些是有效解决的,而另一些则是形式上的困难。我们还将我们的硬度结果与节点阻塞问题的结果进行了比较,并显示了两者之间有趣的差异。我们的主要问题不仅困难,而且没有近似保证,除非P=NP。因此,我们为这个问题设计了一个启发式方法,并将其性能与文献中最先进的启发式方法进行了比较。我们通过对三个真实社会网络的12种(网络,启发式)组合的结果表明,我们的方法在阻止加权和非加权网络传染的能力方面提供了相当大的改进。我们还进行了参数化研究,以了解我们方法的局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Blocking Simple and Complex Contagion by Edge Removal
Eliminating interactions among individuals is an important means of blocking contagion spread, e.g., closing schools during an epidemic or shutting down electronic communication channels during social unrest. We study contagion blocking in networked populations by identifying edges to remove from a network, thus blocking contagion transmission pathways. We formulate various problems to minimize contagion spread and show that some are efficiently solvable while others are formally hard. We also compare our hardness results to those from node blocking problems and show interesting differences between the two. Our main problem is not only hard, but also has no approximation guarantee, unless P=NP. Therefore, we devise a heuristic for the problem and compare its performance to state-of-the-art heuristics from the literature. We show, through results of 12 (network, heuristic) combinations on three real social networks, that our method offers considerable improvement in the ability to block contagions in weighted and unweighted networks. We also conduct a parametric study to understand the limitations of our approach.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信