波动性衍生品和下行风险

Yueh‐Neng Lin
{"title":"波动性衍生品和下行风险","authors":"Yueh‐Neng Lin","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2826647","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The challenge in long volatility strategies is to minimize the cost of carrying such insurance due to negative roll yields and negative volatility risk premia. This study proposes a hedging strategy for volatility as an asset class that provides substantial protection against market crashes, while still participating upside preservation. The results show (i) timely hedging strategy removes the extreme negative tail risk and reduces the negative skewness in exchange for slightly fewer instances of large positive returns; (ii) dynamic allocation effectively mitigates the negative cost-of-carry problem; (iii) using volatility contracts as extreme downside hedges can be a viable alternative to buying out-of-the-money SP and (iv) the significant volatility-hedged return is a form of compensation for investable higher-moment equity risk factors.","PeriodicalId":187811,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Other Econometric Modeling: Capital Markets - Risk (Topic)","volume":"132 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Volatility Derivatives and Downside Risk\",\"authors\":\"Yueh‐Neng Lin\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2826647\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The challenge in long volatility strategies is to minimize the cost of carrying such insurance due to negative roll yields and negative volatility risk premia. This study proposes a hedging strategy for volatility as an asset class that provides substantial protection against market crashes, while still participating upside preservation. The results show (i) timely hedging strategy removes the extreme negative tail risk and reduces the negative skewness in exchange for slightly fewer instances of large positive returns; (ii) dynamic allocation effectively mitigates the negative cost-of-carry problem; (iii) using volatility contracts as extreme downside hedges can be a viable alternative to buying out-of-the-money SP and (iv) the significant volatility-hedged return is a form of compensation for investable higher-moment equity risk factors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":187811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Other Econometric Modeling: Capital Markets - Risk (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"132 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Other Econometric Modeling: Capital Markets - Risk (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2826647\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Other Econometric Modeling: Capital Markets - Risk (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2826647","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

长期波动率策略面临的挑战是,由于负展期收益率和负波动率风险溢价,将持有此类保险的成本降至最低。本研究提出了一种对冲策略,波动性作为一种资产类别,提供实质性的保护,防止市场崩溃,同时仍然参与上行保值。结果表明:(1)及时套期保值策略消除了极端负尾部风险,降低了负偏度,换取了略少的大正收益;(ii)动态分配有效缓解负持有成本问题;(iii)使用波动率合约作为极端下行对冲可以是购买场外标准普尔的可行替代方案;(iv)显著的波动率对冲回报是对可投资的高时刻股票风险因素的一种补偿形式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Volatility Derivatives and Downside Risk
The challenge in long volatility strategies is to minimize the cost of carrying such insurance due to negative roll yields and negative volatility risk premia. This study proposes a hedging strategy for volatility as an asset class that provides substantial protection against market crashes, while still participating upside preservation. The results show (i) timely hedging strategy removes the extreme negative tail risk and reduces the negative skewness in exchange for slightly fewer instances of large positive returns; (ii) dynamic allocation effectively mitigates the negative cost-of-carry problem; (iii) using volatility contracts as extreme downside hedges can be a viable alternative to buying out-of-the-money SP and (iv) the significant volatility-hedged return is a form of compensation for investable higher-moment equity risk factors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信