为什么在紧急情况下还有那么多电话线路留给紧急电话呢?

K. Tanabe, S. Miyata, K. Baba, K. Yamaoka
{"title":"为什么在紧急情况下还有那么多电话线路留给紧急电话呢?","authors":"K. Tanabe, S. Miyata, K. Baba, K. Yamaoka","doi":"10.1109/NETWKS.2014.6959249","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We propose a threshold relaxation and holding time limitation for general telephone calls under trunk reservation control in emergency situations. This TR-HTL method aims to accept more general calls while required emergency calls are still accepted. Computer simulation with a queueing system model of a telephone exchange showed that the threshold relaxation increased the number of accepted general calls while still enabling the required number of emergency calls to be accepted. Comparison between two strategies to set the holding time limit of general calls showed that the value of the limit and the call-blocking rate are in a strong trade-off relationship when the limit is short. An investigation of the relationships between the threshold relaxation rate and the call-blocking rate showed that reserving just 5% of the estimated traffic intensity of emergency calls enabled the required number of emergency calls to be accepted, increasing the number of accepted general calls. Moreover, we showed that much fewer reserved lines are needed for guaranteeing emergency calls.","PeriodicalId":410892,"journal":{"name":"2014 16th International Telecommunications Network Strategy and Planning Symposium (Networks)","volume":"79 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Why are so many lines still reserved for emergency telephone calls in emergency situations?\",\"authors\":\"K. Tanabe, S. Miyata, K. Baba, K. Yamaoka\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/NETWKS.2014.6959249\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We propose a threshold relaxation and holding time limitation for general telephone calls under trunk reservation control in emergency situations. This TR-HTL method aims to accept more general calls while required emergency calls are still accepted. Computer simulation with a queueing system model of a telephone exchange showed that the threshold relaxation increased the number of accepted general calls while still enabling the required number of emergency calls to be accepted. Comparison between two strategies to set the holding time limit of general calls showed that the value of the limit and the call-blocking rate are in a strong trade-off relationship when the limit is short. An investigation of the relationships between the threshold relaxation rate and the call-blocking rate showed that reserving just 5% of the estimated traffic intensity of emergency calls enabled the required number of emergency calls to be accepted, increasing the number of accepted general calls. Moreover, we showed that much fewer reserved lines are needed for guaranteeing emergency calls.\",\"PeriodicalId\":410892,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2014 16th International Telecommunications Network Strategy and Planning Symposium (Networks)\",\"volume\":\"79 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2014 16th International Telecommunications Network Strategy and Planning Symposium (Networks)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/NETWKS.2014.6959249\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 16th International Telecommunications Network Strategy and Planning Symposium (Networks)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/NETWKS.2014.6959249","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

我们建议在紧急情况下对干线预留控制下的一般电话放宽阈值和保留时间限制。此tr - html方法旨在接受更多的一般呼叫,同时仍然接受所需的紧急呼叫。利用电话交换机排队系统模型进行的计算机模拟表明,放宽阈值增加了接受的一般呼叫的数量,同时仍然能够接受所需数量的紧急呼叫。通过对两种设置一般呼叫保持时限策略的比较发现,当保持时限较短时,限制值与呼叫阻塞率之间存在较强的权衡关系。对阈值放宽率与呼叫阻塞率之间关系的调查表明,仅保留紧急呼叫估计流量强度的5%,就可以接受所需数量的紧急呼叫,从而增加了接受的一般呼叫数量。此外,我们还表明,保证紧急呼叫所需的预留线路要少得多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Why are so many lines still reserved for emergency telephone calls in emergency situations?
We propose a threshold relaxation and holding time limitation for general telephone calls under trunk reservation control in emergency situations. This TR-HTL method aims to accept more general calls while required emergency calls are still accepted. Computer simulation with a queueing system model of a telephone exchange showed that the threshold relaxation increased the number of accepted general calls while still enabling the required number of emergency calls to be accepted. Comparison between two strategies to set the holding time limit of general calls showed that the value of the limit and the call-blocking rate are in a strong trade-off relationship when the limit is short. An investigation of the relationships between the threshold relaxation rate and the call-blocking rate showed that reserving just 5% of the estimated traffic intensity of emergency calls enabled the required number of emergency calls to be accepted, increasing the number of accepted general calls. Moreover, we showed that much fewer reserved lines are needed for guaranteeing emergency calls.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信