通过高性能主干网对MPLS VPN进行可扩展性评估

F. Palmieri
{"title":"通过高性能主干网对MPLS VPN进行可扩展性评估","authors":"F. Palmieri","doi":"10.1109/ISCC.2003.1214243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The rapid growth of the Internet and the widespread deployment of networks built around the Internet protocol suite are creating a demand for new capabilities in IP networks. The IP-based virtual private network (VPN) technology is rapidly becoming the foundation for the delivery of future Internet services, and many service providers are offering value-added applications on top of their VPN transport networks. Two unique and complementary architectures based on traditional industry standard encrypted tunnels (IPSec) and still developing multiprotocol label switching (MPLS) technologies are emerging to form the predominant framework for delivery of high performance VPN services. We analyzed the strengths and the weaknesses of both the approaches, and compared their performance and scalability features by carefully testing them against the requirements of the future optical high performance backbones. Our technical considerations and experimental results strongly emphasized the better scalability and reliability of the MPLS/BGP model that seems to be the most promising approach for the provisioning of VPN services on the future Giga-speed optical backbones.","PeriodicalId":356589,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Eighth IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications. ISCC 2003","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"38","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"VPN scalability over high performance backbones evaluating MPLS VPN against traditional approaches\",\"authors\":\"F. Palmieri\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISCC.2003.1214243\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The rapid growth of the Internet and the widespread deployment of networks built around the Internet protocol suite are creating a demand for new capabilities in IP networks. The IP-based virtual private network (VPN) technology is rapidly becoming the foundation for the delivery of future Internet services, and many service providers are offering value-added applications on top of their VPN transport networks. Two unique and complementary architectures based on traditional industry standard encrypted tunnels (IPSec) and still developing multiprotocol label switching (MPLS) technologies are emerging to form the predominant framework for delivery of high performance VPN services. We analyzed the strengths and the weaknesses of both the approaches, and compared their performance and scalability features by carefully testing them against the requirements of the future optical high performance backbones. Our technical considerations and experimental results strongly emphasized the better scalability and reliability of the MPLS/BGP model that seems to be the most promising approach for the provisioning of VPN services on the future Giga-speed optical backbones.\",\"PeriodicalId\":356589,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Eighth IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications. ISCC 2003\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"38\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Eighth IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications. ISCC 2003\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISCC.2003.1214243\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Eighth IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications. ISCC 2003","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISCC.2003.1214243","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 38

摘要

Internet的快速增长和围绕Internet协议套件构建的网络的广泛部署正在对IP网络中的新功能产生需求。基于ip的虚拟专用网(VPN)技术正迅速成为未来Internet服务交付的基础,许多服务提供商正在其VPN传输网络之上提供增值应用程序。基于传统行业标准加密隧道(IPSec)和仍在发展中的多协议标签交换(MPLS)技术的两种独特且互补的架构正在形成高性能VPN业务交付的主要框架。我们分析了这两种方法的优缺点,并通过仔细测试它们与未来光学高性能骨干网的要求来比较它们的性能和可扩展性特征。我们的技术考虑和实验结果强烈地强调了MPLS/BGP模型更好的可扩展性和可靠性,这似乎是在未来千兆速度光骨干网上提供VPN服务的最有前途的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
VPN scalability over high performance backbones evaluating MPLS VPN against traditional approaches
The rapid growth of the Internet and the widespread deployment of networks built around the Internet protocol suite are creating a demand for new capabilities in IP networks. The IP-based virtual private network (VPN) technology is rapidly becoming the foundation for the delivery of future Internet services, and many service providers are offering value-added applications on top of their VPN transport networks. Two unique and complementary architectures based on traditional industry standard encrypted tunnels (IPSec) and still developing multiprotocol label switching (MPLS) technologies are emerging to form the predominant framework for delivery of high performance VPN services. We analyzed the strengths and the weaknesses of both the approaches, and compared their performance and scalability features by carefully testing them against the requirements of the future optical high performance backbones. Our technical considerations and experimental results strongly emphasized the better scalability and reliability of the MPLS/BGP model that seems to be the most promising approach for the provisioning of VPN services on the future Giga-speed optical backbones.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信