A. Deshpande, Rahul Jain, T. Kavitha, J. Radhakrishnan, Satyanarayana V. Lokam
{"title":"为局部可解码代码提供更好的下界","authors":"A. Deshpande, Rahul Jain, T. Kavitha, J. Radhakrishnan, Satyanarayana V. Lokam","doi":"10.1109/CCC.2002.1004354","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An error-correcting code is said to be locally decodable if a randomized algorithm can recover any single bit of a message by reading only a small number of symbols of a possibly corrupted encoding of the message. Katz and Trevisan (2000) showed that any such code C: {0, 1} /spl rarr/ /spl Sigma//sup m/ with a decoding algorithm that makes at most q probes must satisfy m = /spl Omega/((n/log |/spl Sigma/|)/sup q/(q-1)/). They assumed that the decoding algorithm is non-adaptive, and left open the question of proving similar bounds for adaptive decoders. We improve the results of Katz and Trevisan (2000) in two ways. First, we give a more direct proof of their result. Second, and this is our main result, we prove that m = /spl Omega/((n/log|/spl Sigma/|)/sup q/(q-1)/) even if the decoding algorithm is adaptive. An important ingredient of our proof is a randomized method for smoothing an adaptive decoding algorithm. The main technical tool we employ is the Second Moment Method.","PeriodicalId":193513,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings 17th IEEE Annual Conference on Computational Complexity","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"50","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Better lower bounds for locally decodable codes\",\"authors\":\"A. Deshpande, Rahul Jain, T. Kavitha, J. Radhakrishnan, Satyanarayana V. Lokam\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CCC.2002.1004354\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"An error-correcting code is said to be locally decodable if a randomized algorithm can recover any single bit of a message by reading only a small number of symbols of a possibly corrupted encoding of the message. Katz and Trevisan (2000) showed that any such code C: {0, 1} /spl rarr/ /spl Sigma//sup m/ with a decoding algorithm that makes at most q probes must satisfy m = /spl Omega/((n/log |/spl Sigma/|)/sup q/(q-1)/). They assumed that the decoding algorithm is non-adaptive, and left open the question of proving similar bounds for adaptive decoders. We improve the results of Katz and Trevisan (2000) in two ways. First, we give a more direct proof of their result. Second, and this is our main result, we prove that m = /spl Omega/((n/log|/spl Sigma/|)/sup q/(q-1)/) even if the decoding algorithm is adaptive. An important ingredient of our proof is a randomized method for smoothing an adaptive decoding algorithm. The main technical tool we employ is the Second Moment Method.\",\"PeriodicalId\":193513,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings 17th IEEE Annual Conference on Computational Complexity\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"50\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings 17th IEEE Annual Conference on Computational Complexity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CCC.2002.1004354\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings 17th IEEE Annual Conference on Computational Complexity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CCC.2002.1004354","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
An error-correcting code is said to be locally decodable if a randomized algorithm can recover any single bit of a message by reading only a small number of symbols of a possibly corrupted encoding of the message. Katz and Trevisan (2000) showed that any such code C: {0, 1} /spl rarr/ /spl Sigma//sup m/ with a decoding algorithm that makes at most q probes must satisfy m = /spl Omega/((n/log |/spl Sigma/|)/sup q/(q-1)/). They assumed that the decoding algorithm is non-adaptive, and left open the question of proving similar bounds for adaptive decoders. We improve the results of Katz and Trevisan (2000) in two ways. First, we give a more direct proof of their result. Second, and this is our main result, we prove that m = /spl Omega/((n/log|/spl Sigma/|)/sup q/(q-1)/) even if the decoding algorithm is adaptive. An important ingredient of our proof is a randomized method for smoothing an adaptive decoding algorithm. The main technical tool we employ is the Second Moment Method.