混合工具与企业税中的债务-股权区分

A. Emmerich
{"title":"混合工具与企业税中的债务-股权区分","authors":"A. Emmerich","doi":"10.2307/1599573","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Debt and equity are treated differently for many purposes in federal tax law. The most important difference is that payments made on debt may be deducted in computing a corporation's taxable income, while payments made on equity may not. Although this distinction is well-settled, it has little theoretical basis and is not clearly drawn in the tax law. As a result, there has for a long time been confusion over how to classify, for tax purposes, instruments that do not closely resemble \"ordinary\" debt or \"ordinary\" equity.","PeriodicalId":385233,"journal":{"name":"FEN: Differences in Taxation & Corporate Finance (Topic)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1985-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hybrid Instruments and the Debt-Equity Distinction in Corporate Taxation\",\"authors\":\"A. Emmerich\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/1599573\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Debt and equity are treated differently for many purposes in federal tax law. The most important difference is that payments made on debt may be deducted in computing a corporation's taxable income, while payments made on equity may not. Although this distinction is well-settled, it has little theoretical basis and is not clearly drawn in the tax law. As a result, there has for a long time been confusion over how to classify, for tax purposes, instruments that do not closely resemble \\\"ordinary\\\" debt or \\\"ordinary\\\" equity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":385233,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"FEN: Differences in Taxation & Corporate Finance (Topic)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1985-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"FEN: Differences in Taxation & Corporate Finance (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/1599573\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FEN: Differences in Taxation & Corporate Finance (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/1599573","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

在联邦税法中,债务和股权在许多方面被区别对待。最重要的区别是,在计算公司的应税收入时,债务支付可以被扣除,而股权支付则不能。虽然这种区分已经很好地解决了,但它几乎没有理论依据,在税法中也没有明确规定。因此,长期以来,对于如何从税收角度对不太类似于“普通”债务或“普通”股权的工具进行分类一直存在困惑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Hybrid Instruments and the Debt-Equity Distinction in Corporate Taxation
Debt and equity are treated differently for many purposes in federal tax law. The most important difference is that payments made on debt may be deducted in computing a corporation's taxable income, while payments made on equity may not. Although this distinction is well-settled, it has little theoretical basis and is not clearly drawn in the tax law. As a result, there has for a long time been confusion over how to classify, for tax purposes, instruments that do not closely resemble "ordinary" debt or "ordinary" equity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信