危害人类罪

L. Sadat
{"title":"危害人类罪","authors":"L. Sadat","doi":"10.1017/9781108680455.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite the promises made after World War II to eliminate the commission of atrocities, crimes against humanity persist with horrifying ubiquity. Yet the absence of a consistent definition and uniform interpretation of crimes against humanity has made it difficult to establish the theory underlying such crimes and to prosecute them in particular cases. In the 1990s, several ad hoc international criminal tribunals were established to respond to the commission of atrocity crimes, including crimes against humanity, in specific regions of the world in conflict. Building on this legacy, in 1998 a new institution—the International Criminal Court (ICC)— was established to take up the task of defining crimes against humanity and other atrocity crimes and preventing and punishing their commission. Over the next few years, the ad hoc tribunals will complete their mandates. It is widely assumed that the ICC will then be the world’s only functioning international criminal jurisdiction. Given the centrality of charges of crimes against humanity to the successful prosecution of atrocity crimes, the ICC’s treatment of crimes against humanity will therefore be critically important. Moreover, because the ICC is a permanent court with the capacity to intervene in ongoing situations (even prior to the outbreak of conflict in some cases), the Court’s prosecutions of crimes against humanity may assume a preventive role at the ICC that similar prosecutions could never have assumed at the ad hoc tribunals. Because crimes against humanity may be prosecuted in peacetime, they may serve as the predicate for ICC intervention before war and its accompanying atrocities completely overwhelm a civilian population. Indeed, crimes against humanity prosecutions have quickly emerged as central to the ability of the ICC to fulfill its mandate. As of this writing, crimes against humanity have been charged in all seven of the situations currently being prosecuted at the Court. Moreover, in the Kenya, Libya, and Côte d’Ivoire situations, crimes against humanity currently provide the only possible basis for","PeriodicalId":247597,"journal":{"name":"An Introduction to International Criminal Law and Procedure","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Crimes Against Humanity\",\"authors\":\"L. Sadat\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/9781108680455.011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Despite the promises made after World War II to eliminate the commission of atrocities, crimes against humanity persist with horrifying ubiquity. Yet the absence of a consistent definition and uniform interpretation of crimes against humanity has made it difficult to establish the theory underlying such crimes and to prosecute them in particular cases. In the 1990s, several ad hoc international criminal tribunals were established to respond to the commission of atrocity crimes, including crimes against humanity, in specific regions of the world in conflict. Building on this legacy, in 1998 a new institution—the International Criminal Court (ICC)— was established to take up the task of defining crimes against humanity and other atrocity crimes and preventing and punishing their commission. Over the next few years, the ad hoc tribunals will complete their mandates. It is widely assumed that the ICC will then be the world’s only functioning international criminal jurisdiction. Given the centrality of charges of crimes against humanity to the successful prosecution of atrocity crimes, the ICC’s treatment of crimes against humanity will therefore be critically important. Moreover, because the ICC is a permanent court with the capacity to intervene in ongoing situations (even prior to the outbreak of conflict in some cases), the Court’s prosecutions of crimes against humanity may assume a preventive role at the ICC that similar prosecutions could never have assumed at the ad hoc tribunals. Because crimes against humanity may be prosecuted in peacetime, they may serve as the predicate for ICC intervention before war and its accompanying atrocities completely overwhelm a civilian population. Indeed, crimes against humanity prosecutions have quickly emerged as central to the ability of the ICC to fulfill its mandate. As of this writing, crimes against humanity have been charged in all seven of the situations currently being prosecuted at the Court. Moreover, in the Kenya, Libya, and Côte d’Ivoire situations, crimes against humanity currently provide the only possible basis for\",\"PeriodicalId\":247597,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"An Introduction to International Criminal Law and Procedure\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"An Introduction to International Criminal Law and Procedure\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108680455.011\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"An Introduction to International Criminal Law and Procedure","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108680455.011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管在第二次世界大战后作出了消除暴行的承诺,但危害人类的罪行仍然普遍存在。然而,由于对危害人类罪缺乏一致的定义和统一的解释,因此难以确立这类罪行的理论基础,也难以在具体案件中起诉这些罪行。在1990年代,设立了几个特设国际刑事法庭,以对在世界冲突中的特定区域犯下的暴行罪,包括危害人类罪作出反应。在这一遗产的基础上,1998年成立了一个新的机构——国际刑事法院(ICC),以承担定义危害人类罪和其他暴行罪的任务,并预防和惩罚这些罪行。在今后几年中,特设法庭将完成其任务。人们普遍认为,到那时,国际刑事法院将是世界上唯一运作的国际刑事司法机构。鉴于指控危害人类罪对成功起诉暴行罪至关重要,因此国际刑事法院对危害人类罪的处理将至关重要。此外,由于国际刑事法院是一个常设法院,有能力干预正在发生的局势(在某些情况下甚至在冲突爆发之前),法院对危害人类罪的起诉可以在国际刑事法院发挥预防作用,而类似的起诉在特设法庭永远无法发挥这种作用。因为危害人类罪可能在和平时期被起诉,它们可能成为国际刑事法院在战争之前进行干预的前提,而战争所伴随的暴行完全压倒了平民。事实上,起诉危害人类罪已迅速成为国际刑事法院履行其任务能力的核心。在撰写本文时,国际法院目前起诉的所有七起案件都已被指控犯有危害人类罪。此外,在肯尼亚、利比亚和Côte科特迪瓦局势中,危害人类罪目前提供了唯一可能的依据
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Crimes Against Humanity
Despite the promises made after World War II to eliminate the commission of atrocities, crimes against humanity persist with horrifying ubiquity. Yet the absence of a consistent definition and uniform interpretation of crimes against humanity has made it difficult to establish the theory underlying such crimes and to prosecute them in particular cases. In the 1990s, several ad hoc international criminal tribunals were established to respond to the commission of atrocity crimes, including crimes against humanity, in specific regions of the world in conflict. Building on this legacy, in 1998 a new institution—the International Criminal Court (ICC)— was established to take up the task of defining crimes against humanity and other atrocity crimes and preventing and punishing their commission. Over the next few years, the ad hoc tribunals will complete their mandates. It is widely assumed that the ICC will then be the world’s only functioning international criminal jurisdiction. Given the centrality of charges of crimes against humanity to the successful prosecution of atrocity crimes, the ICC’s treatment of crimes against humanity will therefore be critically important. Moreover, because the ICC is a permanent court with the capacity to intervene in ongoing situations (even prior to the outbreak of conflict in some cases), the Court’s prosecutions of crimes against humanity may assume a preventive role at the ICC that similar prosecutions could never have assumed at the ad hoc tribunals. Because crimes against humanity may be prosecuted in peacetime, they may serve as the predicate for ICC intervention before war and its accompanying atrocities completely overwhelm a civilian population. Indeed, crimes against humanity prosecutions have quickly emerged as central to the ability of the ICC to fulfill its mandate. As of this writing, crimes against humanity have been charged in all seven of the situations currently being prosecuted at the Court. Moreover, in the Kenya, Libya, and Côte d’Ivoire situations, crimes against humanity currently provide the only possible basis for
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信