文化人类学的民族志方法教学:当前实践与需要创新

A. Ruth, K. Woolard, T. Sangaramoorthy, Bryan McKinley Jones Brayboy, Melissa Beresford, A. Brewis, H. Bernard, Meskerem Z. Glegziabher, J. Hardin, K. Harper, P. Mahdavi, Jeffrey G. Snodgrass, Cindi Sturtzsreetharan, Amber Wutich
{"title":"文化人类学的民族志方法教学:当前实践与需要创新","authors":"A. Ruth, K. Woolard, T. Sangaramoorthy, Bryan McKinley Jones Brayboy, Melissa Beresford, A. Brewis, H. Bernard, Meskerem Z. Glegziabher, J. Hardin, K. Harper, P. Mahdavi, Jeffrey G. Snodgrass, Cindi Sturtzsreetharan, Amber Wutich","doi":"10.22582/ta.v11i2.634","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Historically, ethnographic methods were learned by cultural anthropology students in individual research projects. This approach creates challenges for teaching in ways that respond to the next generation’s calls to decenter anthropology’s White, heteropatriarchal voices and engage in collaborative community-based research. Analyzing syllabi from 107 ethnographic methods training courses from the United States, we find the tradition of the “lone researcher” persists and is the basis of ethnographic training for the next generation. There is little evidence of either active reflection or team-based pedagogy, both identified as necessary to meet career opportunities and diversification goals for the wider field of cultural anthropology. However, we also find that, by centering the completion of largely individual research projects, most ethnographic methods courses otherwise adhere to best practices in regard to experiential and active learning. Based on the analysis of syllabi in combination with current pedagogical literature, we suggest how cultural anthropologists can revise their ethnographic methods courses to incorporate pedagogy that promotes methodologies and skills to align with the needs of today’s students and communities.","PeriodicalId":407748,"journal":{"name":"Teaching Anthropology","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Teaching Ethnographic Methods for Cultural Anthropology: Current Practices and Needed Innovation\",\"authors\":\"A. Ruth, K. Woolard, T. Sangaramoorthy, Bryan McKinley Jones Brayboy, Melissa Beresford, A. Brewis, H. Bernard, Meskerem Z. Glegziabher, J. Hardin, K. Harper, P. Mahdavi, Jeffrey G. Snodgrass, Cindi Sturtzsreetharan, Amber Wutich\",\"doi\":\"10.22582/ta.v11i2.634\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Historically, ethnographic methods were learned by cultural anthropology students in individual research projects. This approach creates challenges for teaching in ways that respond to the next generation’s calls to decenter anthropology’s White, heteropatriarchal voices and engage in collaborative community-based research. Analyzing syllabi from 107 ethnographic methods training courses from the United States, we find the tradition of the “lone researcher” persists and is the basis of ethnographic training for the next generation. There is little evidence of either active reflection or team-based pedagogy, both identified as necessary to meet career opportunities and diversification goals for the wider field of cultural anthropology. However, we also find that, by centering the completion of largely individual research projects, most ethnographic methods courses otherwise adhere to best practices in regard to experiential and active learning. Based on the analysis of syllabi in combination with current pedagogical literature, we suggest how cultural anthropologists can revise their ethnographic methods courses to incorporate pedagogy that promotes methodologies and skills to align with the needs of today’s students and communities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":407748,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Teaching Anthropology\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Teaching Anthropology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22582/ta.v11i2.634\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teaching Anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22582/ta.v11i2.634","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

历史上,民族志方法是由文化人类学学生在个人研究项目中学习的。这种方法给教学方式带来了挑战,如何回应下一代的呼吁,使人类学的白人、异性父权制的声音消失,并参与以社区为基础的合作研究。通过分析美国107门民族志方法培训课程的教学大纲,我们发现,“单独研究者”的传统依然存在,这是下一代民族志培训的基础。很少有证据表明积极反思或以团队为基础的教学法,这两者都被认为是满足更广泛的文化人类学领域的职业机会和多样化目标所必需的。然而,我们也发现,通过集中完成大部分个人研究项目,大多数人种学方法课程在体验和主动学习方面坚持最佳实践。基于对教学大纲的分析,结合当前的教学文献,我们建议文化人类学家如何修改他们的民族志方法课程,以纳入促进方法和技能的教育学,以符合当今学生和社区的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Teaching Ethnographic Methods for Cultural Anthropology: Current Practices and Needed Innovation
Historically, ethnographic methods were learned by cultural anthropology students in individual research projects. This approach creates challenges for teaching in ways that respond to the next generation’s calls to decenter anthropology’s White, heteropatriarchal voices and engage in collaborative community-based research. Analyzing syllabi from 107 ethnographic methods training courses from the United States, we find the tradition of the “lone researcher” persists and is the basis of ethnographic training for the next generation. There is little evidence of either active reflection or team-based pedagogy, both identified as necessary to meet career opportunities and diversification goals for the wider field of cultural anthropology. However, we also find that, by centering the completion of largely individual research projects, most ethnographic methods courses otherwise adhere to best practices in regard to experiential and active learning. Based on the analysis of syllabi in combination with current pedagogical literature, we suggest how cultural anthropologists can revise their ethnographic methods courses to incorporate pedagogy that promotes methodologies and skills to align with the needs of today’s students and communities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信