没有大棒的胡萝卜?全球环境协定的新融资机制*

P. Sand
{"title":"没有大棒的胡萝卜?全球环境协定的新融资机制*","authors":"P. Sand","doi":"10.1163/187574199X00090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Environmental law has been described as \"a cutting-edge laboratory of international law\" — a metaphor which somehow casts environmental lawyers in the unenviable role of the alchemist who is impatiently expected to find cheap ways of making gold. International environmental law has indeed become a favourite testing ground for innovative policy instruments, including economic incentives (for \"positive measures\") and financial mechanisms in particular. Some of the experiments ongoing have drawn fire, from the defenders of more traditional ways of making international law as well as from the defenders of more traditional ways of spending money. I shall begin, therefore, by placing those instruments in the general context of international development assistance, then focus on the major new financial \"carrots\" of global envi-","PeriodicalId":167092,"journal":{"name":"Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law Online","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Carrots without Sticks? New Financial Mechanisms for Global Environmental Agreements*\",\"authors\":\"P. Sand\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/187574199X00090\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Environmental law has been described as \\\"a cutting-edge laboratory of international law\\\" — a metaphor which somehow casts environmental lawyers in the unenviable role of the alchemist who is impatiently expected to find cheap ways of making gold. International environmental law has indeed become a favourite testing ground for innovative policy instruments, including economic incentives (for \\\"positive measures\\\") and financial mechanisms in particular. Some of the experiments ongoing have drawn fire, from the defenders of more traditional ways of making international law as well as from the defenders of more traditional ways of spending money. I shall begin, therefore, by placing those instruments in the general context of international development assistance, then focus on the major new financial \\\"carrots\\\" of global envi-\",\"PeriodicalId\":167092,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law Online\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law Online\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/187574199X00090\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law Online","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/187574199X00090","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

环境法被描述为“国际法律的前沿实验室”——这一比喻在某种程度上把环境律师置于一个令人羡慕的角色——炼金术士,人们迫不及待地期待他找到廉价的炼金方法。国际环境法确实已成为创新政策工具的试验场,其中包括经济激励(“积极措施”)和特别是金融机制。一些正在进行的实验受到了抨击,既有支持以更传统的方式制定国际法的人,也有支持以更传统的方式花钱的人。因此,我将首先把这些文书放在国际发展援助的总体范围内,然后集中讨论全球环境中新的主要财政“胡萝卜”
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Carrots without Sticks? New Financial Mechanisms for Global Environmental Agreements*
Environmental law has been described as "a cutting-edge laboratory of international law" — a metaphor which somehow casts environmental lawyers in the unenviable role of the alchemist who is impatiently expected to find cheap ways of making gold. International environmental law has indeed become a favourite testing ground for innovative policy instruments, including economic incentives (for "positive measures") and financial mechanisms in particular. Some of the experiments ongoing have drawn fire, from the defenders of more traditional ways of making international law as well as from the defenders of more traditional ways of spending money. I shall begin, therefore, by placing those instruments in the general context of international development assistance, then focus on the major new financial "carrots" of global envi-
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信