{"title":"尼日利亚一组孕妇的口腔卫生状况、牙间清洁和牙龈出血的感觉","authors":"M. Soroye, O. Onigbinde","doi":"10.4314/njdr.v7i1.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Hormonal and vascular changes in pregnancy can lead to exaggeration of inflammatory response to local irritants like dental plaque causing pregnancy gingivitis which if not treated can result in advanced periodontal diseases and consequent adverse pregnancy outcomes. \nObjective: To assess the oral hygiene and gingival bleeding perception of pregnant women \nMethods: Self-administered questionnaires were used to collect data. Oral hygiene status and gingival status were assessed with Simplified Oral Hygiene Index (OHI-S) and gingival bleeding index respectively. Data was analysed using IBM SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences) version 25. Results were presented in frequency and percentages and chi square analysis done for the categorical variables with statistical significance set at P < 0.05. \nResults: One hundred and fifty-one participants with age range of 20 to 43 years with a mean age of 29.85±4.05years participated in the study. All participants used toothbrush to clean their teeth and 44.4% used medium bristled toothbrush. Two-third used herbal toothpaste. More than two-thirds (84.1%) of the participants used both horizontal and vertical tooth brushing technique. Only 33.8% brushed twice daily. Though 92.1% claimed to clean interdentally, only 19.4% used dental floss. Prevalence of gingival bleeding was 31.8%. Two persons (1.3%) thought it normal to bleed from the gum while brushing and 86.8% did not know one can bleed from the gum during pregnancy Forty-four (29.1%) and 18(11.9%) of participants had fair and poor oral hygiene status respectively. 55.6% bled on probing and had gingival bleeding index of 1 and 2. Four (2.6%) of participants had gingival recession measuring 3mm to 4mm and 8.6% had halitosis. Statistical analysis of the association between participants’ perception of gum bleeding and oral hygiene status showed statistical significance. \nConclusion: The knowledge of pregnancy gingivitis is poor among the participants. There is the need to educate them about this and incorporate periodontal care into antenatal care so as to increase their quality of life during pregnancy.","PeriodicalId":155489,"journal":{"name":"Nigerian Journal of Dental Research","volume":"244 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Oral hygiene status, interdental cleaning and perception of gingival bleeding among a group of pregnant women in Nigeria\",\"authors\":\"M. Soroye, O. Onigbinde\",\"doi\":\"10.4314/njdr.v7i1.10\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Hormonal and vascular changes in pregnancy can lead to exaggeration of inflammatory response to local irritants like dental plaque causing pregnancy gingivitis which if not treated can result in advanced periodontal diseases and consequent adverse pregnancy outcomes. \\nObjective: To assess the oral hygiene and gingival bleeding perception of pregnant women \\nMethods: Self-administered questionnaires were used to collect data. Oral hygiene status and gingival status were assessed with Simplified Oral Hygiene Index (OHI-S) and gingival bleeding index respectively. Data was analysed using IBM SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences) version 25. Results were presented in frequency and percentages and chi square analysis done for the categorical variables with statistical significance set at P < 0.05. \\nResults: One hundred and fifty-one participants with age range of 20 to 43 years with a mean age of 29.85±4.05years participated in the study. All participants used toothbrush to clean their teeth and 44.4% used medium bristled toothbrush. Two-third used herbal toothpaste. More than two-thirds (84.1%) of the participants used both horizontal and vertical tooth brushing technique. Only 33.8% brushed twice daily. Though 92.1% claimed to clean interdentally, only 19.4% used dental floss. Prevalence of gingival bleeding was 31.8%. Two persons (1.3%) thought it normal to bleed from the gum while brushing and 86.8% did not know one can bleed from the gum during pregnancy Forty-four (29.1%) and 18(11.9%) of participants had fair and poor oral hygiene status respectively. 55.6% bled on probing and had gingival bleeding index of 1 and 2. Four (2.6%) of participants had gingival recession measuring 3mm to 4mm and 8.6% had halitosis. Statistical analysis of the association between participants’ perception of gum bleeding and oral hygiene status showed statistical significance. \\nConclusion: The knowledge of pregnancy gingivitis is poor among the participants. There is the need to educate them about this and incorporate periodontal care into antenatal care so as to increase their quality of life during pregnancy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":155489,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nigerian Journal of Dental Research\",\"volume\":\"244 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nigerian Journal of Dental Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4314/njdr.v7i1.10\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nigerian Journal of Dental Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/njdr.v7i1.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:妊娠期激素和血管的变化可导致局部刺激物如牙菌斑引起的妊娠牙龈炎的炎症反应放大,如果不治疗可导致晚期牙周病和随之而来的不良妊娠结局。目的:了解孕妇口腔卫生状况及对牙龈出血的认知情况。方法:采用自填问卷法收集资料。采用简化口腔卫生指数(OHI-S)和牙龈出血指数分别评价口腔卫生状况和牙龈状况。使用IBM SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Sciences)第25版对数据进行分析。结果以频率和百分比表示,分类变量进行卡方分析,P < 0.05。结果:151名参与者参与研究,年龄在20 ~ 43岁之间,平均年龄29.85±4.05岁。所有参与者都使用牙刷清洁牙齿,44.4%的人使用中毛牙刷。三分之二的人使用草药牙膏。超过三分之二(84.1%)的参与者同时使用水平和垂直刷牙方法。只有33.8%的人每天刷两次牙。虽然92.1%的人声称会进行内部清洁,但只有19.4%的人使用牙线。牙龈出血发生率为31.8%。2人(1.3%)认为刷牙时牙龈出血是正常的,86.8%的人不知道怀孕期间牙龈出血,44人(29.1%)和18人(11.9%)的参与者口腔卫生状况一般和较差。55.6%的患者探诊时有出血,牙龈出血指数分别为1和2。4名参与者(2.6%)有牙龈萎缩,测量为3毫米至4毫米,8.6%有口臭。统计分析受试者对牙龈出血的感知与口腔卫生状况之间的关系,结果显示有统计学意义。结论:调查对象对妊娠期牙龈炎的认知程度较低。有必要对她们进行这方面的教育,并将牙周保健纳入产前保健,以提高她们在怀孕期间的生活质量。
Oral hygiene status, interdental cleaning and perception of gingival bleeding among a group of pregnant women in Nigeria
Background: Hormonal and vascular changes in pregnancy can lead to exaggeration of inflammatory response to local irritants like dental plaque causing pregnancy gingivitis which if not treated can result in advanced periodontal diseases and consequent adverse pregnancy outcomes.
Objective: To assess the oral hygiene and gingival bleeding perception of pregnant women
Methods: Self-administered questionnaires were used to collect data. Oral hygiene status and gingival status were assessed with Simplified Oral Hygiene Index (OHI-S) and gingival bleeding index respectively. Data was analysed using IBM SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences) version 25. Results were presented in frequency and percentages and chi square analysis done for the categorical variables with statistical significance set at P < 0.05.
Results: One hundred and fifty-one participants with age range of 20 to 43 years with a mean age of 29.85±4.05years participated in the study. All participants used toothbrush to clean their teeth and 44.4% used medium bristled toothbrush. Two-third used herbal toothpaste. More than two-thirds (84.1%) of the participants used both horizontal and vertical tooth brushing technique. Only 33.8% brushed twice daily. Though 92.1% claimed to clean interdentally, only 19.4% used dental floss. Prevalence of gingival bleeding was 31.8%. Two persons (1.3%) thought it normal to bleed from the gum while brushing and 86.8% did not know one can bleed from the gum during pregnancy Forty-four (29.1%) and 18(11.9%) of participants had fair and poor oral hygiene status respectively. 55.6% bled on probing and had gingival bleeding index of 1 and 2. Four (2.6%) of participants had gingival recession measuring 3mm to 4mm and 8.6% had halitosis. Statistical analysis of the association between participants’ perception of gum bleeding and oral hygiene status showed statistical significance.
Conclusion: The knowledge of pregnancy gingivitis is poor among the participants. There is the need to educate them about this and incorporate periodontal care into antenatal care so as to increase their quality of life during pregnancy.