后记

Patricia A. Emison
{"title":"后记","authors":"Patricia A. Emison","doi":"10.5117/9789463724036_epi","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The span of this book is roughly that of directors who had started out in\n silent pictures reaching the end of their careers, including their transitions\n to color. The introduction of sound recording and color both transformed\n filmmaking, not least its cost. Misgivings were voiced early on about the\n moral effect of the new art, even as censorship was deplored. Mannerism\n as an art-historical concept was being developed to supplement that of\n Renaissance naturalism even as filmmakers were trying to reconcile the\n realism to which photography might seem suited with the artificiality it\n also enabled. Although studying the history of film inevitably dredges up\n evidence of racism, sexism, and other prejudices, the history of film, like\n the history of art, is too complex and has long been too deeply engrained\n in our cultural lives for historians to choose to be ignorant of once admired\n works we may now in part or thoroughly deplore, as well as minor yet\n elucidating works that may likewise be problematic, at least in part.\n The supposition that respect is the default response to any work of art\n underestimates the changing role of laughter and other forms of active\n disregard, particularly during the last century.","PeriodicalId":147977,"journal":{"name":"Moving Pictures and Renaissance Art History","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Epilogue\",\"authors\":\"Patricia A. Emison\",\"doi\":\"10.5117/9789463724036_epi\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The span of this book is roughly that of directors who had started out in\\n silent pictures reaching the end of their careers, including their transitions\\n to color. The introduction of sound recording and color both transformed\\n filmmaking, not least its cost. Misgivings were voiced early on about the\\n moral effect of the new art, even as censorship was deplored. Mannerism\\n as an art-historical concept was being developed to supplement that of\\n Renaissance naturalism even as filmmakers were trying to reconcile the\\n realism to which photography might seem suited with the artificiality it\\n also enabled. Although studying the history of film inevitably dredges up\\n evidence of racism, sexism, and other prejudices, the history of film, like\\n the history of art, is too complex and has long been too deeply engrained\\n in our cultural lives for historians to choose to be ignorant of once admired\\n works we may now in part or thoroughly deplore, as well as minor yet\\n elucidating works that may likewise be problematic, at least in part.\\n The supposition that respect is the default response to any work of art\\n underestimates the changing role of laughter and other forms of active\\n disregard, particularly during the last century.\",\"PeriodicalId\":147977,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Moving Pictures and Renaissance Art History\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Moving Pictures and Renaissance Art History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5117/9789463724036_epi\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Moving Pictures and Renaissance Art History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5117/9789463724036_epi","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这本书的跨度大致是那些从无声电影开始到职业生涯结束的导演,包括他们向彩色电影的过渡。录音和彩色电影的引入都改变了电影制作,尤其是它的成本。尽管审查制度遭到谴责,但人们很早就对这种新艺术的道德影响表示了担忧。矫饰主义作为一种艺术历史概念正在发展,以补充文艺复兴时期的自然主义,甚至当电影制作人试图调和摄影似乎适合的现实主义与它也能实现的人为性时。尽管研究电影史不可避免地会挖掘出种族主义、性别歧视和其他偏见的证据,但电影史,就像艺术史一样,太复杂了,而且长期以来在我们的文化生活中根深蒂固,历史学家们不能选择对我们现在可能部分或彻底谴责的曾经钦佩的作品,以及同样可能存在问题的次要但有说明意义的作品,至少在部分上是如此。人们认为尊重是对任何艺术作品的默认反应,这种假设低估了笑和其他形式的主动漠视所扮演的角色的变化,尤其是在上个世纪。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Epilogue
The span of this book is roughly that of directors who had started out in silent pictures reaching the end of their careers, including their transitions to color. The introduction of sound recording and color both transformed filmmaking, not least its cost. Misgivings were voiced early on about the moral effect of the new art, even as censorship was deplored. Mannerism as an art-historical concept was being developed to supplement that of Renaissance naturalism even as filmmakers were trying to reconcile the realism to which photography might seem suited with the artificiality it also enabled. Although studying the history of film inevitably dredges up evidence of racism, sexism, and other prejudices, the history of film, like the history of art, is too complex and has long been too deeply engrained in our cultural lives for historians to choose to be ignorant of once admired works we may now in part or thoroughly deplore, as well as minor yet elucidating works that may likewise be problematic, at least in part. The supposition that respect is the default response to any work of art underestimates the changing role of laughter and other forms of active disregard, particularly during the last century.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信