口服甲硝唑治疗细菌性阴道病比较。成本效益评估。

S. Ransom, J. F. McComish, R. Greenberg, D. A. Tolford
{"title":"口服甲硝唑治疗细菌性阴道病比较。成本效益评估。","authors":"S. Ransom, J. F. McComish, R. Greenberg, D. A. Tolford","doi":"10.1097/00006254-199908000-00015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\nTo compare the cost-effectiveness of metronidazole versus Metrogel Vaginal in the treatment of bacterial vaginosis.\n\n\nSTUDY DESIGN\nSixty consecutive patients with a clinical diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis were randomly assigned prospectively into either the metronidazole, 500 mg (twice daily for seven days by mouth) or Metrogel Vaginal (one applicator twice daily for five days) treatment group. The study patients were aged 18-30 years, without other medical problems. The patients proceeded with outpatient therapy and returned 7-10 days after the completion of treatment for reevaluation. During the study, patients refrained from sexual relations, avoided alcohol and drugs, and avoided all medication. The physician evaluated the patients for bacterial vaginosis through standard wet preparation, whiff test and pH testing prior to and after treatment. The patients were randomized by a nurse and were blinded for study purposes to the evaluating physician.\n\n\nRESULTS\nSuccessful treatment outcomes for bacterial vaginosis occurred in 27 and 28 patients for Metrogel Vaginal and metronidazole, respectively, out of the original 30 patients in each study group. All patients introduced into the study completed the study without difficulty. No significant complications were found in either treatment group. Three patients treated with metronidazole experienced nausea during the treatment interval. The entire cost of treatment was $19.71 and $1.51 for Metrogel Vaginal and metronidazole, respectively.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nThe most cost-effective treatment for bacterial vaginosis was generic metronidazole. While the use of the more expensive Metrogel Vaginal may be reasonable for patients experiencing side effects of oral metronidazole, most patients should be treated with the less expensive generic metronidazole.","PeriodicalId":192418,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of reproductive medicine","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Oral metronidazole vs. Metrogel Vaginal for treating bacterial vaginosis. Cost-effectiveness evaluation.\",\"authors\":\"S. Ransom, J. F. McComish, R. Greenberg, D. A. Tolford\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/00006254-199908000-00015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"OBJECTIVE\\nTo compare the cost-effectiveness of metronidazole versus Metrogel Vaginal in the treatment of bacterial vaginosis.\\n\\n\\nSTUDY DESIGN\\nSixty consecutive patients with a clinical diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis were randomly assigned prospectively into either the metronidazole, 500 mg (twice daily for seven days by mouth) or Metrogel Vaginal (one applicator twice daily for five days) treatment group. The study patients were aged 18-30 years, without other medical problems. The patients proceeded with outpatient therapy and returned 7-10 days after the completion of treatment for reevaluation. During the study, patients refrained from sexual relations, avoided alcohol and drugs, and avoided all medication. The physician evaluated the patients for bacterial vaginosis through standard wet preparation, whiff test and pH testing prior to and after treatment. The patients were randomized by a nurse and were blinded for study purposes to the evaluating physician.\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nSuccessful treatment outcomes for bacterial vaginosis occurred in 27 and 28 patients for Metrogel Vaginal and metronidazole, respectively, out of the original 30 patients in each study group. All patients introduced into the study completed the study without difficulty. No significant complications were found in either treatment group. Three patients treated with metronidazole experienced nausea during the treatment interval. The entire cost of treatment was $19.71 and $1.51 for Metrogel Vaginal and metronidazole, respectively.\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSION\\nThe most cost-effective treatment for bacterial vaginosis was generic metronidazole. While the use of the more expensive Metrogel Vaginal may be reasonable for patients experiencing side effects of oral metronidazole, most patients should be treated with the less expensive generic metronidazole.\",\"PeriodicalId\":192418,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of reproductive medicine\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of reproductive medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/00006254-199908000-00015\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of reproductive medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/00006254-199908000-00015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

目的比较甲硝唑与美泰凝胶治疗细菌性阴道病的成本-效果。研究设计:60例临床诊断为细菌性阴道病的连续患者被随机分配到甲硝唑500 mg(每日两次口服,持续7天)或Metrogel阴道(每日一次涂抹两次,持续5天)治疗组。研究患者年龄在18-30岁之间,没有其他医学问题。患者继续进行门诊治疗,并在治疗结束后7-10天返回进行重新评估。在研究期间,患者避免发生性关系,避免饮酒和吸毒,并避免所有药物治疗。医生在治疗前后通过标准湿准备、嗅嗅试验和pH试验评估患者是否患有细菌性阴道病。患者由一名护士随机分组,为研究目的对评估医师进行盲法。结果在每个研究组最初的30例患者中,分别有27例和28例使用Metrogel阴道和甲硝唑治疗细菌性阴道病成功。所有纳入研究的患者都顺利完成了研究。两组均未见明显并发症。使用甲硝唑治疗的3例患者在治疗期间出现恶心。Metrogel阴道治疗和甲硝唑治疗的总费用分别为19.71美元和1.51美元。结论治疗细菌性阴道病最经济有效的方法是通用甲硝唑。虽然对于经历口服甲硝唑副作用的患者,使用更昂贵的Metrogel阴道可能是合理的,但大多数患者应该使用更便宜的非专利甲硝唑治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Oral metronidazole vs. Metrogel Vaginal for treating bacterial vaginosis. Cost-effectiveness evaluation.
OBJECTIVE To compare the cost-effectiveness of metronidazole versus Metrogel Vaginal in the treatment of bacterial vaginosis. STUDY DESIGN Sixty consecutive patients with a clinical diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis were randomly assigned prospectively into either the metronidazole, 500 mg (twice daily for seven days by mouth) or Metrogel Vaginal (one applicator twice daily for five days) treatment group. The study patients were aged 18-30 years, without other medical problems. The patients proceeded with outpatient therapy and returned 7-10 days after the completion of treatment for reevaluation. During the study, patients refrained from sexual relations, avoided alcohol and drugs, and avoided all medication. The physician evaluated the patients for bacterial vaginosis through standard wet preparation, whiff test and pH testing prior to and after treatment. The patients were randomized by a nurse and were blinded for study purposes to the evaluating physician. RESULTS Successful treatment outcomes for bacterial vaginosis occurred in 27 and 28 patients for Metrogel Vaginal and metronidazole, respectively, out of the original 30 patients in each study group. All patients introduced into the study completed the study without difficulty. No significant complications were found in either treatment group. Three patients treated with metronidazole experienced nausea during the treatment interval. The entire cost of treatment was $19.71 and $1.51 for Metrogel Vaginal and metronidazole, respectively. CONCLUSION The most cost-effective treatment for bacterial vaginosis was generic metronidazole. While the use of the more expensive Metrogel Vaginal may be reasonable for patients experiencing side effects of oral metronidazole, most patients should be treated with the less expensive generic metronidazole.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信