S. Figueiredo, M. Devezas, Neuza Vieira, André Soares
{"title":"新冠肺炎语境下总统话语的心理语言学分析:真实性与情感语气","authors":"S. Figueiredo, M. Devezas, Neuza Vieira, André Soares","doi":"10.20472/iac.2020.054.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to examine authentic discourses of eight country leaders, in two different periods of the COVID-19 context, in order to analyze how their authenticity traits and emotional tone might have changed between February and April of 2020 and according to the updated pandemic numbers of each country. Countries and their leaders were selected based on the West and East representation of the North Hemisphere and with no ethnicity concepts attached. The Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC 2015, v. 1.6.0. 2019) instrument was administered to establish the segmentation and codification of 16 international discourses. The texts were coded considering the linguistic dimensions and psychological categories. After the dataset of 39 073 words concluded, the correlation was computed to link linguistic samples with low/high emotional properties (and taking into account the linguistic style of the Presidents). For this specific paper, the data focused the emotional tone and the perceptual processes. The word count will not be addressed attending to the lexicon frequency, the grammar organization and syntax properties of the eight languages. The samples revealed psycholinguistic controversy registered in the two sessions of presidential discourses. Results for authenticity have shown that the Presidents from US, UK and France were more authentic, contrary to Russian and Chinese leaders? discourses. The emotional tone was negative (above","PeriodicalId":360141,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 54th International Academic Virtual Conference, Prague","volume":"127 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A PSYCHOLINGUISTIC ANALYSIS OF PRESIDENTIAL’ DISCOURSES CONCERNING THE COVID-19 CONTEXT: AUTHENTICITY AND EMOTIONAL TONE\",\"authors\":\"S. Figueiredo, M. Devezas, Neuza Vieira, André Soares\",\"doi\":\"10.20472/iac.2020.054.011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aims to examine authentic discourses of eight country leaders, in two different periods of the COVID-19 context, in order to analyze how their authenticity traits and emotional tone might have changed between February and April of 2020 and according to the updated pandemic numbers of each country. Countries and their leaders were selected based on the West and East representation of the North Hemisphere and with no ethnicity concepts attached. The Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC 2015, v. 1.6.0. 2019) instrument was administered to establish the segmentation and codification of 16 international discourses. The texts were coded considering the linguistic dimensions and psychological categories. After the dataset of 39 073 words concluded, the correlation was computed to link linguistic samples with low/high emotional properties (and taking into account the linguistic style of the Presidents). For this specific paper, the data focused the emotional tone and the perceptual processes. The word count will not be addressed attending to the lexicon frequency, the grammar organization and syntax properties of the eight languages. The samples revealed psycholinguistic controversy registered in the two sessions of presidential discourses. Results for authenticity have shown that the Presidents from US, UK and France were more authentic, contrary to Russian and Chinese leaders? discourses. The emotional tone was negative (above\",\"PeriodicalId\":360141,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 54th International Academic Virtual Conference, Prague\",\"volume\":\"127 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 54th International Academic Virtual Conference, Prague\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20472/iac.2020.054.011\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 54th International Academic Virtual Conference, Prague","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20472/iac.2020.054.011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究旨在研究八个国家领导人在COVID-19背景下的两个不同时期的真实话语,以分析他们的真实性特征和情绪基调在2020年2月至4月期间以及根据每个国家最新的大流行数字可能发生的变化。国家及其领导人是根据北半球的东西方代表选出的,没有任何种族概念。语言查询和单词计数(LIWC 2015, v. 1.6.0)。2019)的工具,以建立16个国际话语的分割和编纂。根据语言维度和心理类别对文本进行编码。在39 073个单词的数据集结束后,计算相关性,将语言样本与低/高情感属性联系起来(并考虑到总统的语言风格)。在这篇论文中,数据集中在情绪基调和感知过程。字数统计将不考虑八种语言的词汇频率、语法组织和句法特性。这些样本揭示了总统两次会议演讲中存在的心理语言学争议。真实性的结果显示,美国、英国和法国的总统更真实,与俄罗斯和中国领导人相反。话语。情绪基调是消极的(见上图)
A PSYCHOLINGUISTIC ANALYSIS OF PRESIDENTIAL’ DISCOURSES CONCERNING THE COVID-19 CONTEXT: AUTHENTICITY AND EMOTIONAL TONE
This study aims to examine authentic discourses of eight country leaders, in two different periods of the COVID-19 context, in order to analyze how their authenticity traits and emotional tone might have changed between February and April of 2020 and according to the updated pandemic numbers of each country. Countries and their leaders were selected based on the West and East representation of the North Hemisphere and with no ethnicity concepts attached. The Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC 2015, v. 1.6.0. 2019) instrument was administered to establish the segmentation and codification of 16 international discourses. The texts were coded considering the linguistic dimensions and psychological categories. After the dataset of 39 073 words concluded, the correlation was computed to link linguistic samples with low/high emotional properties (and taking into account the linguistic style of the Presidents). For this specific paper, the data focused the emotional tone and the perceptual processes. The word count will not be addressed attending to the lexicon frequency, the grammar organization and syntax properties of the eight languages. The samples revealed psycholinguistic controversy registered in the two sessions of presidential discourses. Results for authenticity have shown that the Presidents from US, UK and France were more authentic, contrary to Russian and Chinese leaders? discourses. The emotional tone was negative (above