香港的假新闻立法:现行法律应对假新闻野火的局限性

Bryan Tzu Wei Luk, Derek Chun Pong Cheung
{"title":"香港的假新闻立法:现行法律应对假新闻野火的局限性","authors":"Bryan Tzu Wei Luk, Derek Chun Pong Cheung","doi":"10.30958/ajl.9-1-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Hong Kong government is planning to legislate a new law that can fight against digital wildfire fake news. Hong Kong has faced two waves of fake news digital wildfires in the past few years: The 2019 social unrests in Hong Kong and the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic. The city has witnessed how fake news can undermine social trust and social cohesion, causing large-scale damage to both societies and governments. Fake news brings substantial damage to society due to the erosion of the credibility of governments, rule of law, and the democratic system’s human security. The government’s announcement of legislation has received criticisms and objections. One of the main objections is that the current laws are sufficient to combat against fake news, hence new legislation is not necessary. Yet, our study shows the contrary. We studied laws that have been used by the prosecution to deal with publication and speech related public-order crimes, which are within the Hong Kong National Security Law, the old common law offence Outraging Public Decency, and Crime Ordinance. The study results show that those laws are either outdated or applicable to deal with current fake news problem. Therefore, we argue that a contemporary fake news legislation is indeed needed, but the government should study thoroughly about how the new law can strike an equilibrium between civilian’s freedom and public safety. Keywords: Fake news; Public-order crimes; Criminal liability; False information; Freedom of speech.","PeriodicalId":184533,"journal":{"name":"ATHENS JOURNAL OF LAW","volume":"112 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fake News Legislation in Hong Kong: The Limitations of Current Laws to Counter the Fake News Wildfire\",\"authors\":\"Bryan Tzu Wei Luk, Derek Chun Pong Cheung\",\"doi\":\"10.30958/ajl.9-1-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Hong Kong government is planning to legislate a new law that can fight against digital wildfire fake news. Hong Kong has faced two waves of fake news digital wildfires in the past few years: The 2019 social unrests in Hong Kong and the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic. The city has witnessed how fake news can undermine social trust and social cohesion, causing large-scale damage to both societies and governments. Fake news brings substantial damage to society due to the erosion of the credibility of governments, rule of law, and the democratic system’s human security. The government’s announcement of legislation has received criticisms and objections. One of the main objections is that the current laws are sufficient to combat against fake news, hence new legislation is not necessary. Yet, our study shows the contrary. We studied laws that have been used by the prosecution to deal with publication and speech related public-order crimes, which are within the Hong Kong National Security Law, the old common law offence Outraging Public Decency, and Crime Ordinance. The study results show that those laws are either outdated or applicable to deal with current fake news problem. Therefore, we argue that a contemporary fake news legislation is indeed needed, but the government should study thoroughly about how the new law can strike an equilibrium between civilian’s freedom and public safety. Keywords: Fake news; Public-order crimes; Criminal liability; False information; Freedom of speech.\",\"PeriodicalId\":184533,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ATHENS JOURNAL OF LAW\",\"volume\":\"112 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ATHENS JOURNAL OF LAW\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30958/ajl.9-1-6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ATHENS JOURNAL OF LAW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30958/ajl.9-1-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

香港政府正计划制定一项新法律,以打击数字野火假新闻。过去几年,香港经历了两波假新闻数字野火:2019年香港社会动荡和2020年新冠肺炎大流行。这座城市见证了假新闻如何破坏社会信任和社会凝聚力,对社会和政府造成大规模损害。假新闻对政府公信力、法治和民主制度的人类安全的侵蚀,给社会带来了实质性的损害。政府宣布的立法受到了批评和反对。主要反对意见之一是,现行法律足以打击假新闻,因此没有必要制定新的立法。然而,我们的研究却恰恰相反。我们研究了检控机关在处理与出版及言论有关的公共秩序罪行时所使用的法律,这些罪行包括《香港国家安全法》、旧的普通法罪行《妨害公共道德罪》和《刑事条例》。研究结果表明,这些法律要么过时,要么适用于处理当前的假新闻问题。因此,我们认为当代的假新闻立法确实是必要的,但政府应该深入研究新的法律如何在公民的自由和公共安全之间取得平衡。关键词:假新闻;社会治安罪;刑事责任;虚假信息;言论自由。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fake News Legislation in Hong Kong: The Limitations of Current Laws to Counter the Fake News Wildfire
Hong Kong government is planning to legislate a new law that can fight against digital wildfire fake news. Hong Kong has faced two waves of fake news digital wildfires in the past few years: The 2019 social unrests in Hong Kong and the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic. The city has witnessed how fake news can undermine social trust and social cohesion, causing large-scale damage to both societies and governments. Fake news brings substantial damage to society due to the erosion of the credibility of governments, rule of law, and the democratic system’s human security. The government’s announcement of legislation has received criticisms and objections. One of the main objections is that the current laws are sufficient to combat against fake news, hence new legislation is not necessary. Yet, our study shows the contrary. We studied laws that have been used by the prosecution to deal with publication and speech related public-order crimes, which are within the Hong Kong National Security Law, the old common law offence Outraging Public Decency, and Crime Ordinance. The study results show that those laws are either outdated or applicable to deal with current fake news problem. Therefore, we argue that a contemporary fake news legislation is indeed needed, but the government should study thoroughly about how the new law can strike an equilibrium between civilian’s freedom and public safety. Keywords: Fake news; Public-order crimes; Criminal liability; False information; Freedom of speech.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信