基于源文件变更历史和作者身份的编码违章评价

Aji Ery Burhandenny, Hirohisa Aman, Minoru Kawahara
{"title":"基于源文件变更历史和作者身份的编码违章评价","authors":"Aji Ery Burhandenny, Hirohisa Aman, Minoru Kawahara","doi":"10.2991/ijndc.2017.5.4.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper focuses on an evaluation of coding violation warned by a static code analysis tool while considering the change history of violation and the authorship of source file. Through an empirical study with data collected from seven open source software projects, the following findings are reported: (1) the variety and the evaluation of a coding violation tend to vary accroding to the authoring type of the source file; (2) while important violations tend to vary from project to project, about 30% of violations are commonly disregarded by many programmers.","PeriodicalId":318936,"journal":{"name":"Int. J. Networked Distributed Comput.","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Evaluation of Coding Violation Focusing on Change History and Authorship of Source File\",\"authors\":\"Aji Ery Burhandenny, Hirohisa Aman, Minoru Kawahara\",\"doi\":\"10.2991/ijndc.2017.5.4.3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper focuses on an evaluation of coding violation warned by a static code analysis tool while considering the change history of violation and the authorship of source file. Through an empirical study with data collected from seven open source software projects, the following findings are reported: (1) the variety and the evaluation of a coding violation tend to vary accroding to the authoring type of the source file; (2) while important violations tend to vary from project to project, about 30% of violations are commonly disregarded by many programmers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":318936,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Int. J. Networked Distributed Comput.\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Int. J. Networked Distributed Comput.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2991/ijndc.2017.5.4.3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Int. J. Networked Distributed Comput.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2991/ijndc.2017.5.4.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文在考虑代码违例变化历史和源文件作者身份的情况下,对静态代码分析工具警告的代码违例进行了评价。通过对七个开源软件项目数据的实证研究,报告了以下发现:(1)编码违规的种类和评估倾向于根据源文件的创作类型而变化;(2)虽然重要的违规行为往往因项目而异,但大约30%的违规行为通常被许多程序员忽略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Evaluation of Coding Violation Focusing on Change History and Authorship of Source File
This paper focuses on an evaluation of coding violation warned by a static code analysis tool while considering the change history of violation and the authorship of source file. Through an empirical study with data collected from seven open source software projects, the following findings are reported: (1) the variety and the evaluation of a coding violation tend to vary accroding to the authoring type of the source file; (2) while important violations tend to vary from project to project, about 30% of violations are commonly disregarded by many programmers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信