多感官上肢假肢的同步振动触觉反馈

D. van der Riet, R. Stopforth, G. Bright, O. Diegel
{"title":"多感官上肢假肢的同步振动触觉反馈","authors":"D. van der Riet, R. Stopforth, G. Bright, O. Diegel","doi":"10.1109/ROBOMECH.2013.6685493","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines the ability of a test subject to correctly interpret an incoming sensory signal through a haptic interface. A vibrotactile armband was used to do this consisting of four vibration motors. The success of interpretation is compared as the number of sensory signals is increased to a maximum of four. These senses simulated in the tests are grip force, slippage, object temperature and object texture. The ability to discriminate between these four communication channels is evaluated and it is found that spatial discrimination is the most accurate. The results showed a decrease in discrimination accuracy as the number of channels increases. It was found that the system would be suitable for low resolution multi-sensory feedback. Future work should be done to investigate different haptic feedback communication protocols and training programs.","PeriodicalId":143604,"journal":{"name":"2013 6th Robotics and Mechatronics Conference (RobMech)","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Simultaneous vibrotactile feedback for multisensory upper limb prosthetics\",\"authors\":\"D. van der Riet, R. Stopforth, G. Bright, O. Diegel\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ROBOMECH.2013.6685493\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper examines the ability of a test subject to correctly interpret an incoming sensory signal through a haptic interface. A vibrotactile armband was used to do this consisting of four vibration motors. The success of interpretation is compared as the number of sensory signals is increased to a maximum of four. These senses simulated in the tests are grip force, slippage, object temperature and object texture. The ability to discriminate between these four communication channels is evaluated and it is found that spatial discrimination is the most accurate. The results showed a decrease in discrimination accuracy as the number of channels increases. It was found that the system would be suitable for low resolution multi-sensory feedback. Future work should be done to investigate different haptic feedback communication protocols and training programs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":143604,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2013 6th Robotics and Mechatronics Conference (RobMech)\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2013 6th Robotics and Mechatronics Conference (RobMech)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ROBOMECH.2013.6685493\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 6th Robotics and Mechatronics Conference (RobMech)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ROBOMECH.2013.6685493","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

本文考察了测试对象通过触觉接口正确解释传入感官信号的能力。一个由四个振动马达组成的振动触觉臂带被用来做到这一点。当感官信号的数量增加到最多四个时,口译的成功率就会得到比较。在测试中模拟的这些感官是握力、滑动、物体温度和物体纹理。对这四种沟通渠道的区分能力进行了评估,发现空间区分是最准确的。结果表明,随着通道数的增加,识别精度降低。结果表明,该系统适用于低分辨率的多感官反馈。未来的工作需要研究不同的触觉反馈通信协议和训练方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Simultaneous vibrotactile feedback for multisensory upper limb prosthetics
This paper examines the ability of a test subject to correctly interpret an incoming sensory signal through a haptic interface. A vibrotactile armband was used to do this consisting of four vibration motors. The success of interpretation is compared as the number of sensory signals is increased to a maximum of four. These senses simulated in the tests are grip force, slippage, object temperature and object texture. The ability to discriminate between these four communication channels is evaluated and it is found that spatial discrimination is the most accurate. The results showed a decrease in discrimination accuracy as the number of channels increases. It was found that the system would be suitable for low resolution multi-sensory feedback. Future work should be done to investigate different haptic feedback communication protocols and training programs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信