“一带一路”与印太战略背景下的南海争端——以中国视角

Mɑoyi Zhang
{"title":"“一带一路”与印太战略背景下的南海争端——以中国视角","authors":"Mɑoyi Zhang","doi":"10.38007/proceedings.0000107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Whether for the China’s “Belt and Road”initiative or the US’s Indo-Pacific strategy, the situation in the South China Sea region is a key factor in the smooth progress of each other. All Chinese actions which consistent with international law are not the source of disputes in the South China Sea region. Since the“Belt and Road”initiative, China and other claiming countries in the South China Sea region are actively working together to control the deterioration of the situation and have achieved positive results. At present, it is generally stabilizing.Under the implementation of the Indo-Pacific strategy, the South China Sea dispute has risen from a regional issue to a global issue,and its essence is no longer in the category of regional disputes between China and other claiming countries, but evolve to the strategic game among the big powers under realistic thinking due to insufficient strategic mutual trust and misjudgement of strategic intention. Based on this, China should first acknowledge the actual interests of the America in the Asia-Pacific related regions,continue to consolidate and promote the goog relationship between China and the United States;Secondly, it should be based on the “dual regulations” to promote negotiations between the disputed parties involved;Finally, China needs to actively guide international public opinion through various media to shape its positive international image in the South China Sea region affairs. The South China Sea gets its name from its geographical waters.It is located in the southern waters of the continental margin of mainland China and in the westward waters of the Pacific Ocean.Since the 1970s, multi-party disputes have formed around the sovereignty of the Island Reef and the jurisdiction involved of some sea areas,which includes:China,Vietnam,Philippines, Malaysia, Brunei, Indonesia, and Taiwan.Besides, Intervention by extraterritorial forces has made disputes in this region one of the most complex disputes over island sovereignty and maritime jurisdiction in the world. In the current, China’s sovereign action on the islands of the South China Sea receives high attention from Indo-Pacific Strategy.The situation in the South China Sea is a key variable for the smooth progress of the US’s Indo-Pacific strategy and China’s “Belt and Road” initiative. 1. The Status Quo under the “Belt and Road” Initiative: from Tension to Easing In the early days of the“Belt and Road”initiative,related countries involved in the disputes intensified their activities in the area of dispute. In particular, Vietnam and the Philippines are more active. In 2012, Vietnam passed the National Ocean Law on sovereignty over Xisha and Nansha.In 2020 International Conference on Social and Human Sciences (ICSHS2020) DOI: 10.38007/Proceedings.0000107 ISBN: 978-1-80052-000-4 596 2013,Vietnam established the Fisheries Administration to enhance the marine monitoring capabilities In 2014,the 981 drilling platform incident broke out. The China-Philippine Huangyan Island incident broke out in 2012.The Philippines initiated international arbitration procedures in 2013,and strengthened control over Renai Reef in 2014.In addition, during this period, despite apparent differences of opinion among ASEAN member states, they were still struggling to find a coordinated legal basis. In 2012, ASEAN issued the “Six Principles”,which explicitly stated that “based on the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea and other international laws settle disputes peacefully”, which to some extent reflects the “ASEANization” trend of the South China Sea issue. The “Belt and Road” Initiative is not a dedicated solution to the South China Sea issue, but the countries along the South China Sea are priority areas for the “21st Century Maritime Silk Road”. Since the “Belt and Road” Initiative in 2013, China has made a series of adjustments to Policy in the region. The main performance is embodied into the following three aspects. The first is the “two-track approach”. Specific disputes over the South China Sea are settled by the parties directly through bilateral negotiations on the basis of respect for historical facts and international law. At the same time, peace and stability are jointly maintained by China and ASEAN. This is highly consistent with the spirit of multilateral cooperative governance inherent in the Declaration on the Conduct of Parties(DOC).This marks a change in the way China handles its problems. China has shifted from the idea of negotiating only between disputed states to recognizing limited multilateral discussions. This is fundamentally different from the previous attitude of total rejection. The second is to strengthen the consensus on the “dual-track principle” through high-level exchanges. In October 2013,Chinese President Xi Jinping visited Indonesia and Malaysia respectively. He stated that China is willing to strengthen many maritime development cooperation with ASEAN countries, make good use of the China-ASEAN Maritime Cooperation Fund, jointly develop a good maritime partnership, and work together 21st Century Maritime Silk Road Construction. In the same year, Li Keqiang visited Brune, signed a Memorandum of Understanding on China-Brunei Offshore Cooperation and an agreement on the establishment of a joint venture company in the field of oilfield services. The two sides issued a joint statement on this. When Xi Jinping visited Vietnam and Singapore in 2015,the two sides reached a consensus on “properly handling and managing maritime differences and focusing on advancing maritime cooperation”. When the Philippine President Duterre visited China in 2016, China and the Philippines reaffirmed the “dual-track principle” to resolve the differences and signed the “Joint Statement of the People’s Republic of China and the Republic of the Philippines”. The two sides stated that “ they will continue to settle differences and disputes through negotiations, comprehensively implement the ‘Declaration of Conduct’ (DOC), strive for an early consensus on ‘Code of Conduct’ (COC), maintain restraint, and maintain stability in the South China Sea”. From 2017 to 2018, the three rounds of bilateral consultation mechanisms between China and the Philippines were launched. In November 2018, Xi Jinping paid a state visit to the Philippines, and the two countries signed the Memorandum of Understanding on Cooperation in Oil and Gas Development. The two countries have made significant breakthroughs in practical cooperation. Since the “Belt and Road” initiative, China has taken a “dual-track approach” as a guide, and is actively working to control the deterioration of the situation with other claimants in the region, and has achieved positive results. At present, it is generally stabilizing. In addition, China and ASEAN have achieved remarkable results in regional interaction. In 2016, China and the ASEAN countries adopted the Joint Statement on the Comprehensive and Effective Implementation of the Declaration on the Conduct. China and","PeriodicalId":202744,"journal":{"name":"2020 International Conference on Social and Human Sciences (ICSHS2020)","volume":"121 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Disputes over the South China Sea in the Background of the “Belt and Road” Initiative versus the Indo-Pacific Strategy—From Chinese Perspective\",\"authors\":\"Mɑoyi Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.38007/proceedings.0000107\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Whether for the China’s “Belt and Road”initiative or the US’s Indo-Pacific strategy, the situation in the South China Sea region is a key factor in the smooth progress of each other. All Chinese actions which consistent with international law are not the source of disputes in the South China Sea region. Since the“Belt and Road”initiative, China and other claiming countries in the South China Sea region are actively working together to control the deterioration of the situation and have achieved positive results. At present, it is generally stabilizing.Under the implementation of the Indo-Pacific strategy, the South China Sea dispute has risen from a regional issue to a global issue,and its essence is no longer in the category of regional disputes between China and other claiming countries, but evolve to the strategic game among the big powers under realistic thinking due to insufficient strategic mutual trust and misjudgement of strategic intention. Based on this, China should first acknowledge the actual interests of the America in the Asia-Pacific related regions,continue to consolidate and promote the goog relationship between China and the United States;Secondly, it should be based on the “dual regulations” to promote negotiations between the disputed parties involved;Finally, China needs to actively guide international public opinion through various media to shape its positive international image in the South China Sea region affairs. The South China Sea gets its name from its geographical waters.It is located in the southern waters of the continental margin of mainland China and in the westward waters of the Pacific Ocean.Since the 1970s, multi-party disputes have formed around the sovereignty of the Island Reef and the jurisdiction involved of some sea areas,which includes:China,Vietnam,Philippines, Malaysia, Brunei, Indonesia, and Taiwan.Besides, Intervention by extraterritorial forces has made disputes in this region one of the most complex disputes over island sovereignty and maritime jurisdiction in the world. In the current, China’s sovereign action on the islands of the South China Sea receives high attention from Indo-Pacific Strategy.The situation in the South China Sea is a key variable for the smooth progress of the US’s Indo-Pacific strategy and China’s “Belt and Road” initiative. 1. The Status Quo under the “Belt and Road” Initiative: from Tension to Easing In the early days of the“Belt and Road”initiative,related countries involved in the disputes intensified their activities in the area of dispute. In particular, Vietnam and the Philippines are more active. In 2012, Vietnam passed the National Ocean Law on sovereignty over Xisha and Nansha.In 2020 International Conference on Social and Human Sciences (ICSHS2020) DOI: 10.38007/Proceedings.0000107 ISBN: 978-1-80052-000-4 596 2013,Vietnam established the Fisheries Administration to enhance the marine monitoring capabilities In 2014,the 981 drilling platform incident broke out. The China-Philippine Huangyan Island incident broke out in 2012.The Philippines initiated international arbitration procedures in 2013,and strengthened control over Renai Reef in 2014.In addition, during this period, despite apparent differences of opinion among ASEAN member states, they were still struggling to find a coordinated legal basis. In 2012, ASEAN issued the “Six Principles”,which explicitly stated that “based on the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea and other international laws settle disputes peacefully”, which to some extent reflects the “ASEANization” trend of the South China Sea issue. The “Belt and Road” Initiative is not a dedicated solution to the South China Sea issue, but the countries along the South China Sea are priority areas for the “21st Century Maritime Silk Road”. Since the “Belt and Road” Initiative in 2013, China has made a series of adjustments to Policy in the region. The main performance is embodied into the following three aspects. The first is the “two-track approach”. Specific disputes over the South China Sea are settled by the parties directly through bilateral negotiations on the basis of respect for historical facts and international law. At the same time, peace and stability are jointly maintained by China and ASEAN. This is highly consistent with the spirit of multilateral cooperative governance inherent in the Declaration on the Conduct of Parties(DOC).This marks a change in the way China handles its problems. China has shifted from the idea of negotiating only between disputed states to recognizing limited multilateral discussions. This is fundamentally different from the previous attitude of total rejection. The second is to strengthen the consensus on the “dual-track principle” through high-level exchanges. In October 2013,Chinese President Xi Jinping visited Indonesia and Malaysia respectively. He stated that China is willing to strengthen many maritime development cooperation with ASEAN countries, make good use of the China-ASEAN Maritime Cooperation Fund, jointly develop a good maritime partnership, and work together 21st Century Maritime Silk Road Construction. In the same year, Li Keqiang visited Brune, signed a Memorandum of Understanding on China-Brunei Offshore Cooperation and an agreement on the establishment of a joint venture company in the field of oilfield services. The two sides issued a joint statement on this. When Xi Jinping visited Vietnam and Singapore in 2015,the two sides reached a consensus on “properly handling and managing maritime differences and focusing on advancing maritime cooperation”. When the Philippine President Duterre visited China in 2016, China and the Philippines reaffirmed the “dual-track principle” to resolve the differences and signed the “Joint Statement of the People’s Republic of China and the Republic of the Philippines”. The two sides stated that “ they will continue to settle differences and disputes through negotiations, comprehensively implement the ‘Declaration of Conduct’ (DOC), strive for an early consensus on ‘Code of Conduct’ (COC), maintain restraint, and maintain stability in the South China Sea”. From 2017 to 2018, the three rounds of bilateral consultation mechanisms between China and the Philippines were launched. In November 2018, Xi Jinping paid a state visit to the Philippines, and the two countries signed the Memorandum of Understanding on Cooperation in Oil and Gas Development. The two countries have made significant breakthroughs in practical cooperation. Since the “Belt and Road” initiative, China has taken a “dual-track approach” as a guide, and is actively working to control the deterioration of the situation with other claimants in the region, and has achieved positive results. At present, it is generally stabilizing. In addition, China and ASEAN have achieved remarkable results in regional interaction. In 2016, China and the ASEAN countries adopted the Joint Statement on the Comprehensive and Effective Implementation of the Declaration on the Conduct. China and\",\"PeriodicalId\":202744,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 International Conference on Social and Human Sciences (ICSHS2020)\",\"volume\":\"121 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 International Conference on Social and Human Sciences (ICSHS2020)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.38007/proceedings.0000107\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 International Conference on Social and Human Sciences (ICSHS2020)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.38007/proceedings.0000107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

无论是中国的“一带一路”倡议,还是美国的印太战略,南海地区局势都是彼此顺利推进的关键因素。中国所有符合国际法的行为都不是南海地区争议的根源。自“一带一路”倡议提出以来,中国和南海地区其他声索国积极合作,控制局势恶化,取得了积极成果。目前总体企稳。在印太战略的实施下,南海争端已从地区问题上升为全球性问题,其实质不再属于中国与其他声索国的地区争端范畴,而是由于战略互信不足和战略意图误判,在现实思维下演变为大国之间的战略博弈。基于此,中国首先应承认美国在亚太相关地区的实际利益,继续巩固和促进中美良好关系;其次,应以“双重规制”为基础,推动争议当事国之间的谈判;最后,中国需要通过各种媒体积极引导国际舆论,塑造中国在南海地区事务中的积极国际形象。南中国海因其地理水域而得名。它位于中国大陆大陆边缘的南部水域和太平洋的西部水域。20世纪70年代以来,围绕岛礁主权归属和部分海域管辖权问题形成多方争议,涉及国家包括:中国、越南、菲律宾、马来西亚、文莱、印度尼西亚和台湾。此外,域外势力的干预使该地区的争端成为世界上最复杂的岛屿主权和海洋管辖权争端之一。当前,中国在南海诸岛的主权行动受到印太战略的高度关注。南海局势是美国“印太战略”和中国“一带一路”能否顺利推进的关键变量。1. “一带一路”倡议下的现状:从紧张到缓和在“一带一路”倡议提出初期,争议当事国在争议地区的活动加剧。特别是越南和菲律宾更加活跃。2012年,越南通过了关于西沙、南沙主权的《国家海洋法》。2020年国际社会与人文科学会议(ICSHS2020) DOI: 10.38007/Proceedings.00001072013年,越南成立了渔业局,以加强海洋监测能力。2014年,981钻井平台事件爆发。2012年,中菲黄岩岛事件爆发。菲律宾于2013年提起国际仲裁程序,并于2014年加强对仁爱礁的控制。此外,在此期间,尽管东盟成员国之间存在明显的意见分歧,但它们仍在努力寻找协调一致的法律基础。2012年,东盟发布“六项原则”,明确提出“根据《联合国海洋法公约》及其他国际法和平解决争端”,这在一定程度上反映了南海问题的“东盟化”趋势。“一带一路”倡议不是针对南海问题的专门解决方案,但南海沿岸国家是“21世纪海上丝绸之路”的优先区域。自2013年提出“一带一路”倡议以来,中国对地区政策进行了一系列调整。主要表现在以下三个方面。一是“双轨并进”。有关南海的具体争议,由当事国在尊重历史事实和国际法的基础上,通过双边谈判直接解决。同时,和平稳定也是中国和东盟共同维护的。这与《各方行为宣言》所蕴含的多边合作治理精神高度契合。这标志着中国处理问题的方式发生了变化。中国已经从只在有争议的国家之间谈判的想法转变为承认有限的多边讨论。这与以前完全拒绝的态度有根本的不同。二是通过高层交往,加强对“双轨原则”的共识。 他表示,中国愿与东盟国家加强多方面的海洋开发合作,用好中国-东盟海上合作基金,共同发展良好的海洋伙伴关系,携手建设21世纪海上丝绸之路。双方就此发表了联合声明。2016年菲律宾总统杜特尔特访华时,中菲双方重申了解决分歧的“双轨原则”,并签署了《中华人民共和国和菲律宾共和国联合声明》。双方表示,将继续通过谈判解决分歧和争议,全面落实《南海各方行为宣言》(DOC),争取早日达成“南海行为准则”(COC)共识,保持克制,维护南海稳定。2017年至2018年,中菲启动了三轮双边磋商机制。两国务实合作取得重大突破。自“一带一路”倡议提出以来,中国以“双轨并行”思路为指导,积极努力控制与地区其他声索方的局势恶化,并取得了积极成果。目前总体企稳。此外,中国和东盟在区域互动中取得了显著成果。2016年,中国与东盟国家发表《关于全面有效落实《南海各方行为宣言》的联合声明》。中国和
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Disputes over the South China Sea in the Background of the “Belt and Road” Initiative versus the Indo-Pacific Strategy—From Chinese Perspective
Whether for the China’s “Belt and Road”initiative or the US’s Indo-Pacific strategy, the situation in the South China Sea region is a key factor in the smooth progress of each other. All Chinese actions which consistent with international law are not the source of disputes in the South China Sea region. Since the“Belt and Road”initiative, China and other claiming countries in the South China Sea region are actively working together to control the deterioration of the situation and have achieved positive results. At present, it is generally stabilizing.Under the implementation of the Indo-Pacific strategy, the South China Sea dispute has risen from a regional issue to a global issue,and its essence is no longer in the category of regional disputes between China and other claiming countries, but evolve to the strategic game among the big powers under realistic thinking due to insufficient strategic mutual trust and misjudgement of strategic intention. Based on this, China should first acknowledge the actual interests of the America in the Asia-Pacific related regions,continue to consolidate and promote the goog relationship between China and the United States;Secondly, it should be based on the “dual regulations” to promote negotiations between the disputed parties involved;Finally, China needs to actively guide international public opinion through various media to shape its positive international image in the South China Sea region affairs. The South China Sea gets its name from its geographical waters.It is located in the southern waters of the continental margin of mainland China and in the westward waters of the Pacific Ocean.Since the 1970s, multi-party disputes have formed around the sovereignty of the Island Reef and the jurisdiction involved of some sea areas,which includes:China,Vietnam,Philippines, Malaysia, Brunei, Indonesia, and Taiwan.Besides, Intervention by extraterritorial forces has made disputes in this region one of the most complex disputes over island sovereignty and maritime jurisdiction in the world. In the current, China’s sovereign action on the islands of the South China Sea receives high attention from Indo-Pacific Strategy.The situation in the South China Sea is a key variable for the smooth progress of the US’s Indo-Pacific strategy and China’s “Belt and Road” initiative. 1. The Status Quo under the “Belt and Road” Initiative: from Tension to Easing In the early days of the“Belt and Road”initiative,related countries involved in the disputes intensified their activities in the area of dispute. In particular, Vietnam and the Philippines are more active. In 2012, Vietnam passed the National Ocean Law on sovereignty over Xisha and Nansha.In 2020 International Conference on Social and Human Sciences (ICSHS2020) DOI: 10.38007/Proceedings.0000107 ISBN: 978-1-80052-000-4 596 2013,Vietnam established the Fisheries Administration to enhance the marine monitoring capabilities In 2014,the 981 drilling platform incident broke out. The China-Philippine Huangyan Island incident broke out in 2012.The Philippines initiated international arbitration procedures in 2013,and strengthened control over Renai Reef in 2014.In addition, during this period, despite apparent differences of opinion among ASEAN member states, they were still struggling to find a coordinated legal basis. In 2012, ASEAN issued the “Six Principles”,which explicitly stated that “based on the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea and other international laws settle disputes peacefully”, which to some extent reflects the “ASEANization” trend of the South China Sea issue. The “Belt and Road” Initiative is not a dedicated solution to the South China Sea issue, but the countries along the South China Sea are priority areas for the “21st Century Maritime Silk Road”. Since the “Belt and Road” Initiative in 2013, China has made a series of adjustments to Policy in the region. The main performance is embodied into the following three aspects. The first is the “two-track approach”. Specific disputes over the South China Sea are settled by the parties directly through bilateral negotiations on the basis of respect for historical facts and international law. At the same time, peace and stability are jointly maintained by China and ASEAN. This is highly consistent with the spirit of multilateral cooperative governance inherent in the Declaration on the Conduct of Parties(DOC).This marks a change in the way China handles its problems. China has shifted from the idea of negotiating only between disputed states to recognizing limited multilateral discussions. This is fundamentally different from the previous attitude of total rejection. The second is to strengthen the consensus on the “dual-track principle” through high-level exchanges. In October 2013,Chinese President Xi Jinping visited Indonesia and Malaysia respectively. He stated that China is willing to strengthen many maritime development cooperation with ASEAN countries, make good use of the China-ASEAN Maritime Cooperation Fund, jointly develop a good maritime partnership, and work together 21st Century Maritime Silk Road Construction. In the same year, Li Keqiang visited Brune, signed a Memorandum of Understanding on China-Brunei Offshore Cooperation and an agreement on the establishment of a joint venture company in the field of oilfield services. The two sides issued a joint statement on this. When Xi Jinping visited Vietnam and Singapore in 2015,the two sides reached a consensus on “properly handling and managing maritime differences and focusing on advancing maritime cooperation”. When the Philippine President Duterre visited China in 2016, China and the Philippines reaffirmed the “dual-track principle” to resolve the differences and signed the “Joint Statement of the People’s Republic of China and the Republic of the Philippines”. The two sides stated that “ they will continue to settle differences and disputes through negotiations, comprehensively implement the ‘Declaration of Conduct’ (DOC), strive for an early consensus on ‘Code of Conduct’ (COC), maintain restraint, and maintain stability in the South China Sea”. From 2017 to 2018, the three rounds of bilateral consultation mechanisms between China and the Philippines were launched. In November 2018, Xi Jinping paid a state visit to the Philippines, and the two countries signed the Memorandum of Understanding on Cooperation in Oil and Gas Development. The two countries have made significant breakthroughs in practical cooperation. Since the “Belt and Road” initiative, China has taken a “dual-track approach” as a guide, and is actively working to control the deterioration of the situation with other claimants in the region, and has achieved positive results. At present, it is generally stabilizing. In addition, China and ASEAN have achieved remarkable results in regional interaction. In 2016, China and the ASEAN countries adopted the Joint Statement on the Comprehensive and Effective Implementation of the Declaration on the Conduct. China and
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信