{"title":"重新讨论了国际法的漏洞和不流动问题","authors":"K. Morita","doi":"10.15057/28304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The question of whether international tribunals should declare non liquet when faced with lacunae in international law has long been an issue. In 1875, lʼInstitut de Droit International denied the declaration of non liquet by international tribunals in its Resolution saying “le tribunal arbitral ne peut refuser de prononcer sous le prétexte quʼil nʼest pas suffisamment éclairé soit sur les faits, soit sur les principes juridiques quʼil doit appliquer.” 1","PeriodicalId":208983,"journal":{"name":"Hitotsubashi journal of law and politics","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THE ISSUE OF LACUNAE IN INTERNATIONAL LAW AND NON LIQUET REVISITED\",\"authors\":\"K. Morita\",\"doi\":\"10.15057/28304\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The question of whether international tribunals should declare non liquet when faced with lacunae in international law has long been an issue. In 1875, lʼInstitut de Droit International denied the declaration of non liquet by international tribunals in its Resolution saying “le tribunal arbitral ne peut refuser de prononcer sous le prétexte quʼil nʼest pas suffisamment éclairé soit sur les faits, soit sur les principes juridiques quʼil doit appliquer.” 1\",\"PeriodicalId\":208983,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hitotsubashi journal of law and politics\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hitotsubashi journal of law and politics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15057/28304\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hitotsubashi journal of law and politics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15057/28304","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
国际法庭在面对国际法的漏洞时是否应宣布无效的问题长期以来一直是一个问题。In 1875 lʼdenied国际法研究所,非liquet by the declaration of In its时报说“国际法庭仲裁法庭不能拒绝的借口,在宣布ʼnʼ光线不够,要么是他的事实或法律原则,ʼ必须执行。”1
THE ISSUE OF LACUNAE IN INTERNATIONAL LAW AND NON LIQUET REVISITED
The question of whether international tribunals should declare non liquet when faced with lacunae in international law has long been an issue. In 1875, lʼInstitut de Droit International denied the declaration of non liquet by international tribunals in its Resolution saying “le tribunal arbitral ne peut refuser de prononcer sous le prétexte quʼil nʼest pas suffisamment éclairé soit sur les faits, soit sur les principes juridiques quʼil doit appliquer.” 1