人工与自动机器翻译评价:汉葡翻译质量的灰色关联分析

Yuqi Sun, Lap-Man Hoi, S. Im
{"title":"人工与自动机器翻译评价:汉葡翻译质量的灰色关联分析","authors":"Yuqi Sun, Lap-Man Hoi, S. Im","doi":"10.1109/CCAI57533.2023.10201322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigates the relationship between manual and automatic machine translation evaluation methodologies by employing Grey Correlation Analysis (GRA) to assess the correlation between Chinese-Portuguese machine translation outputs’ BLEU scores and human evaluation scores based on a proposed evaluation index system. The research aims to provide insights into the factors impacting machine translation quality and the most relevant linguistic dimensions in translation evaluation. The findings reveal that “usability” and “adequacy” exhibit the highest correlation with BLEU scores, while “Semantics” ranks highest among the ten manual evaluation indicators, when correlated with the aggregated human evaluation results, followed by “Correction” (correct information) and “Omission and/or Addition”. The findings contribute to the field of machine translation evaluation by illuminating the complex relationship between manual and automatic evaluation techniques and guiding future improvements in machine translation systems and evaluation methodologies.","PeriodicalId":285760,"journal":{"name":"2023 IEEE 3rd International Conference on Computer Communication and Artificial Intelligence (CCAI)","volume":"86 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examining Manual and Automatic MT Evaluation: A Grey Relational Analysis for Chinese-Portuguese Translation Quality\",\"authors\":\"Yuqi Sun, Lap-Man Hoi, S. Im\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CCAI57533.2023.10201322\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study investigates the relationship between manual and automatic machine translation evaluation methodologies by employing Grey Correlation Analysis (GRA) to assess the correlation between Chinese-Portuguese machine translation outputs’ BLEU scores and human evaluation scores based on a proposed evaluation index system. The research aims to provide insights into the factors impacting machine translation quality and the most relevant linguistic dimensions in translation evaluation. The findings reveal that “usability” and “adequacy” exhibit the highest correlation with BLEU scores, while “Semantics” ranks highest among the ten manual evaluation indicators, when correlated with the aggregated human evaluation results, followed by “Correction” (correct information) and “Omission and/or Addition”. The findings contribute to the field of machine translation evaluation by illuminating the complex relationship between manual and automatic evaluation techniques and guiding future improvements in machine translation systems and evaluation methodologies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":285760,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2023 IEEE 3rd International Conference on Computer Communication and Artificial Intelligence (CCAI)\",\"volume\":\"86 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2023 IEEE 3rd International Conference on Computer Communication and Artificial Intelligence (CCAI)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CCAI57533.2023.10201322\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 IEEE 3rd International Conference on Computer Communication and Artificial Intelligence (CCAI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CCAI57533.2023.10201322","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究通过灰色关联分析(GRA),在提出的评价指标体系的基础上,评估中葡机器翻译输出的BLEU分数与人工评价分数之间的相关性,探讨人工和自动机器翻译评价方法之间的关系。本研究旨在深入了解影响机器翻译质量的因素以及翻译评价中最相关的语言维度。结果表明,“可用性”和“充分性”与BLEU分数的相关性最高,而“语义性”在10个人工评估指标中排名最高,当与汇总的人工评估结果相关时,其次是“更正”(正确的信息)和“遗漏和/或添加”。这些发现通过阐明人工和自动评估技术之间的复杂关系,并指导未来机器翻译系统和评估方法的改进,有助于机器翻译评估领域的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Examining Manual and Automatic MT Evaluation: A Grey Relational Analysis for Chinese-Portuguese Translation Quality
This study investigates the relationship between manual and automatic machine translation evaluation methodologies by employing Grey Correlation Analysis (GRA) to assess the correlation between Chinese-Portuguese machine translation outputs’ BLEU scores and human evaluation scores based on a proposed evaluation index system. The research aims to provide insights into the factors impacting machine translation quality and the most relevant linguistic dimensions in translation evaluation. The findings reveal that “usability” and “adequacy” exhibit the highest correlation with BLEU scores, while “Semantics” ranks highest among the ten manual evaluation indicators, when correlated with the aggregated human evaluation results, followed by “Correction” (correct information) and “Omission and/or Addition”. The findings contribute to the field of machine translation evaluation by illuminating the complex relationship between manual and automatic evaluation techniques and guiding future improvements in machine translation systems and evaluation methodologies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信