不完全信息和破产风险下私有化的最优财务设计

S. Banerji, V. Errunza
{"title":"不完全信息和破产风险下私有化的最优财务设计","authors":"S. Banerji, V. Errunza","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.301562","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper studies privatization under moral hazard and adverse selection. We show that under the presence of moral hazard, the optimal financial package of privatization consists of selling 100 per cent equity together with a subsidy on the observed cash flow. Price of the equity reflects the costs of the subsidy. However, in the presence of both moral hazard and adverse selection, the optimal policy consists of a dual method of privatization in which the government offers simultaneously a sale of 100 per cent equity with a subsidy and a higher price with another option where the investor pays a smaller price and buys less than 100 per cent equity without subsidy. The more efficient investors opt for the first method while the less efficient investors prefer the second. The dual privatization method screens investors and provides them with maximum incentives to invest while minimizing the risk of bankruptcy in the post-privatization era. Hence, this paper suggests that while concentrated ownership is optimal for an efficient firm, the less efficient firm should be entitled to less than 100 per cent ownership in the presence of asymmetric information.","PeriodicalId":151935,"journal":{"name":"EFA 2002 Submissions","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimal Financial Design of Privatization Under Incomplete Information and Bankruptcy Risk\",\"authors\":\"S. Banerji, V. Errunza\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.301562\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper studies privatization under moral hazard and adverse selection. We show that under the presence of moral hazard, the optimal financial package of privatization consists of selling 100 per cent equity together with a subsidy on the observed cash flow. Price of the equity reflects the costs of the subsidy. However, in the presence of both moral hazard and adverse selection, the optimal policy consists of a dual method of privatization in which the government offers simultaneously a sale of 100 per cent equity with a subsidy and a higher price with another option where the investor pays a smaller price and buys less than 100 per cent equity without subsidy. The more efficient investors opt for the first method while the less efficient investors prefer the second. The dual privatization method screens investors and provides them with maximum incentives to invest while minimizing the risk of bankruptcy in the post-privatization era. Hence, this paper suggests that while concentrated ownership is optimal for an efficient firm, the less efficient firm should be entitled to less than 100 per cent ownership in the presence of asymmetric information.\",\"PeriodicalId\":151935,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EFA 2002 Submissions\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-02-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EFA 2002 Submissions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.301562\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EFA 2002 Submissions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.301562","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文研究了道德风险和逆向选择下的私有化问题。我们表明,在存在道德风险的情况下,私有化的最优财务方案包括出售100%的股权并对观察到的现金流量进行补贴。股权价格反映了补贴的成本。然而,在存在道德风险和逆向选择的情况下,最优政策包括双重私有化方法,即政府同时提供出售100%股权并提供补贴,同时提供更高的价格,另一种选择是投资者支付更低的价格,在没有补贴的情况下购买不到100%的股权。效率较高的投资者选择第一种方法,而效率较低的投资者选择第二种方法。双重私有化方式筛选投资者,为投资者提供最大的投资激励,同时最大限度地降低后私有化时代破产的风险。因此,本文提出,虽然集中所有权对高效企业来说是最优的,但在信息不对称的情况下,效率较低的企业应该有权拥有不到100%的所有权。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Optimal Financial Design of Privatization Under Incomplete Information and Bankruptcy Risk
This paper studies privatization under moral hazard and adverse selection. We show that under the presence of moral hazard, the optimal financial package of privatization consists of selling 100 per cent equity together with a subsidy on the observed cash flow. Price of the equity reflects the costs of the subsidy. However, in the presence of both moral hazard and adverse selection, the optimal policy consists of a dual method of privatization in which the government offers simultaneously a sale of 100 per cent equity with a subsidy and a higher price with another option where the investor pays a smaller price and buys less than 100 per cent equity without subsidy. The more efficient investors opt for the first method while the less efficient investors prefer the second. The dual privatization method screens investors and provides them with maximum incentives to invest while minimizing the risk of bankruptcy in the post-privatization era. Hence, this paper suggests that while concentrated ownership is optimal for an efficient firm, the less efficient firm should be entitled to less than 100 per cent ownership in the presence of asymmetric information.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信