这样可以吗?对极端的探索

N. Barter, L. Houghton
{"title":"这样可以吗?对极端的探索","authors":"N. Barter, L. Houghton","doi":"10.9774/GLEAF.4700.2014.JU.00006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents an abridged version of a fictional story titled Is this OK?, a story about a day in the life of an individual in a non-specific future. It was written as a teaching aid to help students critically engage with theory, as experience has taught the authors that students engagement with conventional academic articles is problematic. There are three principal theories that inform the story, notwithstanding that the piece also alludes to other contemporary issues and a reader is likely to identify the influence of a variety of theoretical constructs. The three are natural capital, companies selling solutions rather products or services and a construct of humans as being a temporal negotiation between their genetic material and the environment they find themselves in. The first two concepts are, as the article discusses, encapsulated within but not limited to the concept of natural capitalism. The third draws on a construct of a human as being a phenotype. It should be noted that while the story can be read as polemic, this is not the intent, rather the intent is to invoke questioning and reflection to aid critical development.","PeriodicalId":429926,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Corporate Citizenship","volume":"92 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is This OK? An Exploration of Extremes\",\"authors\":\"N. Barter, L. Houghton\",\"doi\":\"10.9774/GLEAF.4700.2014.JU.00006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper presents an abridged version of a fictional story titled Is this OK?, a story about a day in the life of an individual in a non-specific future. It was written as a teaching aid to help students critically engage with theory, as experience has taught the authors that students engagement with conventional academic articles is problematic. There are three principal theories that inform the story, notwithstanding that the piece also alludes to other contemporary issues and a reader is likely to identify the influence of a variety of theoretical constructs. The three are natural capital, companies selling solutions rather products or services and a construct of humans as being a temporal negotiation between their genetic material and the environment they find themselves in. The first two concepts are, as the article discusses, encapsulated within but not limited to the concept of natural capitalism. The third draws on a construct of a human as being a phenotype. It should be noted that while the story can be read as polemic, this is not the intent, rather the intent is to invoke questioning and reflection to aid critical development.\",\"PeriodicalId\":429926,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Corporate Citizenship\",\"volume\":\"92 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Corporate Citizenship\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.9774/GLEAF.4700.2014.JU.00006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Corporate Citizenship","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9774/GLEAF.4700.2014.JU.00006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文介绍了一个虚构故事的节略版本,标题为“这是可以的吗?”,一个关于个人生活中的一天的故事,在一个不确定的未来。它是作为一种教学辅助工具来帮助学生批判性地参与理论,因为经验告诉作者,学生参与传统的学术文章是有问题的。尽管这篇文章也暗示了其他当代问题,读者很可能会发现各种理论结构的影响,但有三种主要理论为这个故事提供了信息。这三者分别是自然资本、出售解决方案(而非产品或服务)的公司,以及一种将人类视为遗传物质与其所处环境之间的暂时谈判的构想。正如文章所讨论的,前两个概念包含在但不限于自然资本主义的概念中。第三种是把人看作是表现型。值得注意的是,虽然这个故事可以被解读为论战性的,但这并不是目的,而是为了引发质疑和反思,以帮助批判性的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Is This OK? An Exploration of Extremes
This paper presents an abridged version of a fictional story titled Is this OK?, a story about a day in the life of an individual in a non-specific future. It was written as a teaching aid to help students critically engage with theory, as experience has taught the authors that students engagement with conventional academic articles is problematic. There are three principal theories that inform the story, notwithstanding that the piece also alludes to other contemporary issues and a reader is likely to identify the influence of a variety of theoretical constructs. The three are natural capital, companies selling solutions rather products or services and a construct of humans as being a temporal negotiation between their genetic material and the environment they find themselves in. The first two concepts are, as the article discusses, encapsulated within but not limited to the concept of natural capitalism. The third draws on a construct of a human as being a phenotype. It should be noted that while the story can be read as polemic, this is not the intent, rather the intent is to invoke questioning and reflection to aid critical development.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信