{"title":"在“好，坏，丑”自动高频交易两年后","authors":"Tommi A. Vuorenmaa","doi":"10.3905/JOT.2015.10.2.101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The rage over high-frequency trading (HFT) and its role in financial markets has not quieted down. In some respects, the debate has heated up. This commentary letter gives personal perspectives to a review article by the same author that appeared in The Journal of Trading two years ago (Vuorenmaa [2013]). These insights could be developed into a policy that would make the markets work more efficiently with a better image.","PeriodicalId":254660,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Trading","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Two Years after “The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly” of Automated High-Frequency Trading\",\"authors\":\"Tommi A. Vuorenmaa\",\"doi\":\"10.3905/JOT.2015.10.2.101\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The rage over high-frequency trading (HFT) and its role in financial markets has not quieted down. In some respects, the debate has heated up. This commentary letter gives personal perspectives to a review article by the same author that appeared in The Journal of Trading two years ago (Vuorenmaa [2013]). These insights could be developed into a policy that would make the markets work more efficiently with a better image.\",\"PeriodicalId\":254660,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Trading\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Trading\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3905/JOT.2015.10.2.101\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Trading","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3905/JOT.2015.10.2.101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
对高频交易(HFT)及其在金融市场中的作用的愤怒并没有平息。在某些方面，争论已经升温。这封评论信对两年前发表在the Journal of Trading (Vuorenmaa[2013])上的同一作者的一篇评论文章提出了个人观点。这些见解可以发展成一项政策，使市场以更好的形象更有效地运作。
Two Years after “The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly” of Automated High-Frequency Trading
The rage over high-frequency trading (HFT) and its role in financial markets has not quieted down. In some respects, the debate has heated up. This commentary letter gives personal perspectives to a review article by the same author that appeared in The Journal of Trading two years ago (Vuorenmaa [2013]). These insights could be developed into a policy that would make the markets work more efficiently with a better image.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
