经导管主动脉植入术(TAVI)后的传导障碍和永久性心脏起搏-最新综述

A. M. Júnior, Marcelo de Freitas Ribeiro
{"title":"经导管主动脉植入术(TAVI)后的传导障碍和永久性心脏起搏-最新综述","authors":"A. M. Júnior, Marcelo de Freitas Ribeiro","doi":"10.9734/bpi/idhr/v3/12530d","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aortic valve replacement is a routine procedure with acceptable risk. In some cases, mortality is high, contraindicating the procedure. The minimally invasive transcatheter aortic valve implantation seems to be an alternative, reducing morbidity and mortality. In this procedure, a bioprosthetic valve is introduced through a catheter and fixed within the injured native aortic valve. Even though the technique is considered comparatively safe, the risks of complications exist and they that have been established by individuals after the technique, for example new-onset permanent left bundle branch block (LBBB) and the need for permanent cardiac pacing implantation. A systematic review of literature of PUBMED was carried out using “10 years” and “free full texts” as filters, containing the terms “TAVI,” “pacing,” and “complications,” finding a total of eight articles. Other databases, such as SCIELO, Google Scholar and MEDLINE were used to give background, consistency, and profundity to the text. The implantation of aortic valve prosthesis per catheter seems to be a valid modality for high–surgical risk patients with aortic stenosis. The results of this series of patients suggest that the need for a definitive pacemaker after endovascular treatment is not inexorable and is not easily predicted by the risk factors described so far. TAVI is the procedure of choice considered feasible and safe. Since the site of implantation of the valve prosthesis is close to septal cardiac structures with important function, conduction disorders are frequent, requiring cautious surveillance for at least seven days after the procedure. A lack of consensus and large variability in the management of conduction disturbances post-TAVR exists. Future studies need to validate the proposed algorithm and determine the role of EP studies, ambulatory continuous ECG monitoring, and prophylactic pacemaker in the management of conduction disturbance in post-TAVR patients.","PeriodicalId":250257,"journal":{"name":"Issues and Development in Health Research Vol. 3","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conduction Disturbances and Permanent Cardiac Pacing after Transcatheter Aortic Implantation (TAVI) - An Update Overview\",\"authors\":\"A. M. Júnior, Marcelo de Freitas Ribeiro\",\"doi\":\"10.9734/bpi/idhr/v3/12530d\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aortic valve replacement is a routine procedure with acceptable risk. In some cases, mortality is high, contraindicating the procedure. The minimally invasive transcatheter aortic valve implantation seems to be an alternative, reducing morbidity and mortality. In this procedure, a bioprosthetic valve is introduced through a catheter and fixed within the injured native aortic valve. Even though the technique is considered comparatively safe, the risks of complications exist and they that have been established by individuals after the technique, for example new-onset permanent left bundle branch block (LBBB) and the need for permanent cardiac pacing implantation. A systematic review of literature of PUBMED was carried out using “10 years” and “free full texts” as filters, containing the terms “TAVI,” “pacing,” and “complications,” finding a total of eight articles. Other databases, such as SCIELO, Google Scholar and MEDLINE were used to give background, consistency, and profundity to the text. The implantation of aortic valve prosthesis per catheter seems to be a valid modality for high–surgical risk patients with aortic stenosis. The results of this series of patients suggest that the need for a definitive pacemaker after endovascular treatment is not inexorable and is not easily predicted by the risk factors described so far. TAVI is the procedure of choice considered feasible and safe. Since the site of implantation of the valve prosthesis is close to septal cardiac structures with important function, conduction disorders are frequent, requiring cautious surveillance for at least seven days after the procedure. A lack of consensus and large variability in the management of conduction disturbances post-TAVR exists. Future studies need to validate the proposed algorithm and determine the role of EP studies, ambulatory continuous ECG monitoring, and prophylactic pacemaker in the management of conduction disturbance in post-TAVR patients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":250257,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Issues and Development in Health Research Vol. 3\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Issues and Development in Health Research Vol. 3\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.9734/bpi/idhr/v3/12530d\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Issues and Development in Health Research Vol. 3","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/bpi/idhr/v3/12530d","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

主动脉瓣置换术是一项常规手术,风险可接受。在某些情况下,死亡率很高,这是手术的禁忌。微创经导管主动脉瓣植入术似乎是另一种选择,可以降低发病率和死亡率。在这个过程中,一个生物假体瓣膜通过导管引入并固定在受损的原生主动脉瓣内。尽管该技术被认为是相对安全的,但存在并发症的风险,这些风险是在技术后由个人确定的,例如新发永久性左束支阻滞(LBBB)和需要永久性心脏起搏植入。以“10年”和“免费全文”为筛选词,包含“TAVI”、“节奏”和“并发症”等术语,对PUBMED文献进行系统综述,共发现8篇文章。其他数据库,如SCIELO、Google Scholar和MEDLINE被用来提供文本的背景、一致性和深度。主动脉瓣置换术是治疗主动脉瓣狭窄高危患者的有效方法。这一系列患者的结果表明,在血管内治疗后需要一个明确的起搏器并不是不可避免的,也不容易通过目前所描述的危险因素来预测。TAVI被认为是可行和安全的手术选择。由于瓣膜假体植入位置靠近具有重要功能的心脏间隔结构,容易出现传导障碍,术后至少7天需要谨慎监测。在tavr后传导干扰的管理方面缺乏共识和很大的可变性。未来的研究需要验证所提出的算法,并确定EP研究、动态连续ECG监测和预防性起搏器在tavr后患者传导障碍管理中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Conduction Disturbances and Permanent Cardiac Pacing after Transcatheter Aortic Implantation (TAVI) - An Update Overview
Aortic valve replacement is a routine procedure with acceptable risk. In some cases, mortality is high, contraindicating the procedure. The minimally invasive transcatheter aortic valve implantation seems to be an alternative, reducing morbidity and mortality. In this procedure, a bioprosthetic valve is introduced through a catheter and fixed within the injured native aortic valve. Even though the technique is considered comparatively safe, the risks of complications exist and they that have been established by individuals after the technique, for example new-onset permanent left bundle branch block (LBBB) and the need for permanent cardiac pacing implantation. A systematic review of literature of PUBMED was carried out using “10 years” and “free full texts” as filters, containing the terms “TAVI,” “pacing,” and “complications,” finding a total of eight articles. Other databases, such as SCIELO, Google Scholar and MEDLINE were used to give background, consistency, and profundity to the text. The implantation of aortic valve prosthesis per catheter seems to be a valid modality for high–surgical risk patients with aortic stenosis. The results of this series of patients suggest that the need for a definitive pacemaker after endovascular treatment is not inexorable and is not easily predicted by the risk factors described so far. TAVI is the procedure of choice considered feasible and safe. Since the site of implantation of the valve prosthesis is close to septal cardiac structures with important function, conduction disorders are frequent, requiring cautious surveillance for at least seven days after the procedure. A lack of consensus and large variability in the management of conduction disturbances post-TAVR exists. Future studies need to validate the proposed algorithm and determine the role of EP studies, ambulatory continuous ECG monitoring, and prophylactic pacemaker in the management of conduction disturbance in post-TAVR patients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信