键盘开关调制电机制备的机械参数差异:可穿戴脑电图研究

Hiroki Watanabe, K. Nakajima, S. Takagi, Ryo Mizuyama, Mayumi Saito, Koichi Furusawa, Kunio Nakatani, Y. Yokota, Hirotaka Kataoka, H. Nakajima, Y. Naruse
{"title":"键盘开关调制电机制备的机械参数差异:可穿戴脑电图研究","authors":"Hiroki Watanabe, K. Nakajima, S. Takagi, Ryo Mizuyama, Mayumi Saito, Koichi Furusawa, Kunio Nakatani, Y. Yokota, Hirotaka Kataoka, H. Nakajima, Y. Naruse","doi":"10.3389/fnrgo.2021.644449","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The mechanical parameters of keyboard switches affect the psychological sense of pressing. The effects of different mechanical parameters on psychological sense have been quantified using questionnaires, but these subjective evaluations are unable to fully clarify the modulation of information processing in the brain due to these differences. This study aimed to elucidate the ability of electroencephalography (EEG) measurements to detect the modulation of subconscious information processing according to mechanical parameter values. To this end, we prepared five mechanical switches with linearly increasing values of pretravel (PT: the distance from the free position until the operating position). We hypothesized that the differences in PTs would subconsciously affect the motor preparation prior to pressing switches because switches with PTs that deviated from those commonly used were predicted to increase the users' attention level when pressing. Differences in motor preparation were quantified using the mean amplitudes of the late contingent negative variation (CNV). We recorded EEGs of 25 gamers during a reaction task for fast switch pressing after a response cue preceded by a pre-cue for response preparation; we also measured the reaction time feedback on each switch pressing trial. Participants performed five sessions (60 trials per session) in total. For the analysis, trials were divided into first (session 1, 2, and 3) and second half sessions (session 4 and 5). In the latter session, CNV amplitudes were significantly higher for the switch with the highest PT than for that with a medium PT, which is closest to that commonly used in commercial mechanical switches. On the other hand, the questionnaire did not detect any significant differences between PTs in their subjective rankings of the psychological effects of switch pressing. These results suggest that differences in PTs modulate motor preparation to press switches, and that EEG measurements may provide a novel objective evaluation of the mechanical parameters of keyboard switches.","PeriodicalId":207447,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Neuroergonomics","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differences in Mechanical Parameters of Keyboard Switches Modulate Motor Preparation: A Wearable EEG Study\",\"authors\":\"Hiroki Watanabe, K. Nakajima, S. Takagi, Ryo Mizuyama, Mayumi Saito, Koichi Furusawa, Kunio Nakatani, Y. Yokota, Hirotaka Kataoka, H. Nakajima, Y. Naruse\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fnrgo.2021.644449\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The mechanical parameters of keyboard switches affect the psychological sense of pressing. The effects of different mechanical parameters on psychological sense have been quantified using questionnaires, but these subjective evaluations are unable to fully clarify the modulation of information processing in the brain due to these differences. This study aimed to elucidate the ability of electroencephalography (EEG) measurements to detect the modulation of subconscious information processing according to mechanical parameter values. To this end, we prepared five mechanical switches with linearly increasing values of pretravel (PT: the distance from the free position until the operating position). We hypothesized that the differences in PTs would subconsciously affect the motor preparation prior to pressing switches because switches with PTs that deviated from those commonly used were predicted to increase the users' attention level when pressing. Differences in motor preparation were quantified using the mean amplitudes of the late contingent negative variation (CNV). We recorded EEGs of 25 gamers during a reaction task for fast switch pressing after a response cue preceded by a pre-cue for response preparation; we also measured the reaction time feedback on each switch pressing trial. Participants performed five sessions (60 trials per session) in total. For the analysis, trials were divided into first (session 1, 2, and 3) and second half sessions (session 4 and 5). In the latter session, CNV amplitudes were significantly higher for the switch with the highest PT than for that with a medium PT, which is closest to that commonly used in commercial mechanical switches. On the other hand, the questionnaire did not detect any significant differences between PTs in their subjective rankings of the psychological effects of switch pressing. These results suggest that differences in PTs modulate motor preparation to press switches, and that EEG measurements may provide a novel objective evaluation of the mechanical parameters of keyboard switches.\",\"PeriodicalId\":207447,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Neuroergonomics\",\"volume\":\"53 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Neuroergonomics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnrgo.2021.644449\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Neuroergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnrgo.2021.644449","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

键盘开关的力学参数会影响按动的心理感受。不同机械参数对心理感觉的影响已经通过问卷量化,但这些主观评价并不能完全阐明这些差异对大脑信息加工的调节作用。本研究旨在阐明脑电图测量根据机械参数值检测潜意识信息加工调制的能力。为此,我们制备了5个预行程值线性递增的机械开关(PT:从自由位置到工作位置的距离)。我们假设PTs的差异会潜意识地影响按下开关前的运动准备,因为与常用的PTs偏离的开关预计会增加用户按下开关时的注意力水平。使用晚期偶然负变异(CNV)的平均振幅来量化运动准备的差异。我们记录了25名玩家在快速按下开关的反应任务期间的脑电图,在反应提示之前有一个反应准备的预提示;我们还测量了每次按下开关试验的反应时间反馈。参与者总共进行了五次试验(每次60次试验)。为了进行分析,试验分为第一阶段(第1、2和3阶段)和第二阶段(第4和5阶段)。在后一阶段,最高PT的开关的CNV幅度明显高于中等PT的开关,中等PT最接近商用机械开关中常用的CNV幅度。另一方面,问卷并未发现PTs在按开关心理效果的主观排名上有显著差异。这些结果表明,PTs的差异调节了按下开关的运动准备,脑电图测量可能为键盘开关的机械参数提供一种新的客观评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Differences in Mechanical Parameters of Keyboard Switches Modulate Motor Preparation: A Wearable EEG Study
The mechanical parameters of keyboard switches affect the psychological sense of pressing. The effects of different mechanical parameters on psychological sense have been quantified using questionnaires, but these subjective evaluations are unable to fully clarify the modulation of information processing in the brain due to these differences. This study aimed to elucidate the ability of electroencephalography (EEG) measurements to detect the modulation of subconscious information processing according to mechanical parameter values. To this end, we prepared five mechanical switches with linearly increasing values of pretravel (PT: the distance from the free position until the operating position). We hypothesized that the differences in PTs would subconsciously affect the motor preparation prior to pressing switches because switches with PTs that deviated from those commonly used were predicted to increase the users' attention level when pressing. Differences in motor preparation were quantified using the mean amplitudes of the late contingent negative variation (CNV). We recorded EEGs of 25 gamers during a reaction task for fast switch pressing after a response cue preceded by a pre-cue for response preparation; we also measured the reaction time feedback on each switch pressing trial. Participants performed five sessions (60 trials per session) in total. For the analysis, trials were divided into first (session 1, 2, and 3) and second half sessions (session 4 and 5). In the latter session, CNV amplitudes were significantly higher for the switch with the highest PT than for that with a medium PT, which is closest to that commonly used in commercial mechanical switches. On the other hand, the questionnaire did not detect any significant differences between PTs in their subjective rankings of the psychological effects of switch pressing. These results suggest that differences in PTs modulate motor preparation to press switches, and that EEG measurements may provide a novel objective evaluation of the mechanical parameters of keyboard switches.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信