达克瓦发展中对另类媒体的回应:一个伊斯兰的视角

Zainal Fadri, Akhyar Hanif
{"title":"达克瓦发展中对另类媒体的回应:一个伊斯兰的视角","authors":"Zainal Fadri, Akhyar Hanif","doi":"10.31958/jsk.v7i1.9746","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Dakwah trends get a lot of developments in the world of dakwah. In the past people proselytizing by conventional means, such as by conducting meetings and making an assessment on matters related to the value of jurisprudence and theology. But in fact, today many new media that give a different color to the model of delivering dakwah among the people. Mainstream media that can be found among them YouTube, websites, blogs and social media. Their presence is quite quickly a special concern for people who have a concentration on dakwah. Many people feel that the presence of the media can degrade the quality of dakwah delivered, but the opposite of that, the presence of these media into a dakwah progress. Everyone can gain knowledge dakwah anywhere and anytime. In this study the researcher wanted to know how the response from the public to the presence of alternative media in conveying dakwah? After that, the researcher made a mapping and views of dakwah activists about it. The method used in this research is a descriptive qualitative method that seeks to see responses from the public about alternative media, so it is expected to find a thought and answer to the community's anxiety about its presence. In this study found several responses from the public towards the development of dakwah with alternative media. Based on the community active in dakwah giving positive and negative responses. A negative response is given on the grounds that preaching through the media has a bad impact, because no one is responsible for the delivery error, then they suggest that preaching continue to be done in the normal way. Another group gave a positive response in the development of dakwah through alternative media, because it is considered more flexible, so that the teaching in the dakwah does have its limitations.","PeriodicalId":378327,"journal":{"name":"Alfuad: Jurnal Sosial Keagamaan","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Response to Alternative Media in The Development of Dakwah: An Islamic Perspective\",\"authors\":\"Zainal Fadri, Akhyar Hanif\",\"doi\":\"10.31958/jsk.v7i1.9746\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Dakwah trends get a lot of developments in the world of dakwah. In the past people proselytizing by conventional means, such as by conducting meetings and making an assessment on matters related to the value of jurisprudence and theology. But in fact, today many new media that give a different color to the model of delivering dakwah among the people. Mainstream media that can be found among them YouTube, websites, blogs and social media. Their presence is quite quickly a special concern for people who have a concentration on dakwah. Many people feel that the presence of the media can degrade the quality of dakwah delivered, but the opposite of that, the presence of these media into a dakwah progress. Everyone can gain knowledge dakwah anywhere and anytime. In this study the researcher wanted to know how the response from the public to the presence of alternative media in conveying dakwah? After that, the researcher made a mapping and views of dakwah activists about it. The method used in this research is a descriptive qualitative method that seeks to see responses from the public about alternative media, so it is expected to find a thought and answer to the community's anxiety about its presence. In this study found several responses from the public towards the development of dakwah with alternative media. Based on the community active in dakwah giving positive and negative responses. A negative response is given on the grounds that preaching through the media has a bad impact, because no one is responsible for the delivery error, then they suggest that preaching continue to be done in the normal way. Another group gave a positive response in the development of dakwah through alternative media, because it is considered more flexible, so that the teaching in the dakwah does have its limitations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":378327,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Alfuad: Jurnal Sosial Keagamaan\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Alfuad: Jurnal Sosial Keagamaan\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31958/jsk.v7i1.9746\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alfuad: Jurnal Sosial Keagamaan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31958/jsk.v7i1.9746","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Dakwah趋势在Dakwah的世界里得到了很多发展。在过去,人们通过传统的方式进行传教,例如通过召开会议和对法理学和神学价值有关的问题进行评估。但事实上,今天许多新媒体赋予了一种不同的颜色,在人民中传递dakwah的模式。主流媒体包括YouTube、网站、博客和社交媒体。他们的出现很快就会引起那些专注于dakwah的人的特别关注。很多人觉得媒体的存在会降低dakwah传递的质量,但恰恰相反,这些媒体的存在反而成为dakwah的进步。每个人都可以随时随地获得知识。在这项研究中,研究者想知道公众对另类媒体在传递dakwah时的反应如何?之后,研究人员绘制了一幅地图,并对dakwah活动人士的看法进行了分析。本研究使用的方法是一种描述性定性方法,旨在了解公众对另类媒体的反应,因此有望找到一种思考和答案,以解决社区对其存在的焦虑。在本研究中,我们发现了公众对另类媒体发展dakwah的几种反应。基于社区活跃在dakwah给予积极和消极的回应。一个负面的回应是,通过媒体讲道有不好的影响,因为没有人对传递错误负责,然后他们建议讲道继续以正常的方式进行。另一组对通过替代媒体发展dakwah给出了积极的回应,因为它被认为是更灵活的,所以dakwah的教学确实有其局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Response to Alternative Media in The Development of Dakwah: An Islamic Perspective
Dakwah trends get a lot of developments in the world of dakwah. In the past people proselytizing by conventional means, such as by conducting meetings and making an assessment on matters related to the value of jurisprudence and theology. But in fact, today many new media that give a different color to the model of delivering dakwah among the people. Mainstream media that can be found among them YouTube, websites, blogs and social media. Their presence is quite quickly a special concern for people who have a concentration on dakwah. Many people feel that the presence of the media can degrade the quality of dakwah delivered, but the opposite of that, the presence of these media into a dakwah progress. Everyone can gain knowledge dakwah anywhere and anytime. In this study the researcher wanted to know how the response from the public to the presence of alternative media in conveying dakwah? After that, the researcher made a mapping and views of dakwah activists about it. The method used in this research is a descriptive qualitative method that seeks to see responses from the public about alternative media, so it is expected to find a thought and answer to the community's anxiety about its presence. In this study found several responses from the public towards the development of dakwah with alternative media. Based on the community active in dakwah giving positive and negative responses. A negative response is given on the grounds that preaching through the media has a bad impact, because no one is responsible for the delivery error, then they suggest that preaching continue to be done in the normal way. Another group gave a positive response in the development of dakwah through alternative media, because it is considered more flexible, so that the teaching in the dakwah does have its limitations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信