利用系统图属性增强系统风险分析

Floriane Brunetto, Julien Peuch, S. Bassetto
{"title":"利用系统图属性增强系统风险分析","authors":"Floriane Brunetto, Julien Peuch, S. Bassetto","doi":"10.1109/SYSCON.2015.7116766","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Classical failure modes and effects analyses are known to be tedious activities and perceived by design teams as reengineering efforts. This research investigates a new manner to cut down side effects of classical risks analyses. It proposes to use the complexity measure of the underlying graph of the system being designed, to infer information about risks. To do so, the research method is three-folded: (1) a literature review is made to select relevant risk analyses and graph methodologies employed during design to ground our proposal (2) the proposal is built (3) the feasibility of this concept is tested over a real product design. The main result of this paper is to unveil a new manner to consider risks for improving their control during design stages.","PeriodicalId":251318,"journal":{"name":"2015 Annual IEEE Systems Conference (SysCon) Proceedings","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"System risk analysis enhanced with system graph properties\",\"authors\":\"Floriane Brunetto, Julien Peuch, S. Bassetto\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SYSCON.2015.7116766\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Classical failure modes and effects analyses are known to be tedious activities and perceived by design teams as reengineering efforts. This research investigates a new manner to cut down side effects of classical risks analyses. It proposes to use the complexity measure of the underlying graph of the system being designed, to infer information about risks. To do so, the research method is three-folded: (1) a literature review is made to select relevant risk analyses and graph methodologies employed during design to ground our proposal (2) the proposal is built (3) the feasibility of this concept is tested over a real product design. The main result of this paper is to unveil a new manner to consider risks for improving their control during design stages.\",\"PeriodicalId\":251318,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2015 Annual IEEE Systems Conference (SysCon) Proceedings\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-04-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2015 Annual IEEE Systems Conference (SysCon) Proceedings\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SYSCON.2015.7116766\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 Annual IEEE Systems Conference (SysCon) Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SYSCON.2015.7116766","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

众所周知,经典的失效模式和影响分析是乏味的活动,被设计团队视为再造工作。本研究探讨了一种减少经典风险分析副作用的新方法。它建议使用正在设计的系统底层图的复杂性度量来推断有关风险的信息。为此,研究方法是三重的:(1)进行文献综述,选择设计过程中使用的相关风险分析和图表方法来支撑我们的提案(2)建立提案(3)通过实际产品设计测试该概念的可行性。本文的主要成果是揭示了一种新的方式来考虑风险,以改善其在设计阶段的控制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
System risk analysis enhanced with system graph properties
Classical failure modes and effects analyses are known to be tedious activities and perceived by design teams as reengineering efforts. This research investigates a new manner to cut down side effects of classical risks analyses. It proposes to use the complexity measure of the underlying graph of the system being designed, to infer information about risks. To do so, the research method is three-folded: (1) a literature review is made to select relevant risk analyses and graph methodologies employed during design to ground our proposal (2) the proposal is built (3) the feasibility of this concept is tested over a real product design. The main result of this paper is to unveil a new manner to consider risks for improving their control during design stages.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信