LDA、QDA和KNN算法在脑电左右肢体运动分类中的性能分析

S. Bhattacharyya, A. Khasnobish, Somsirsa Chatterjee, A. Konar, D. Tibarewala
{"title":"LDA、QDA和KNN算法在脑电左右肢体运动分类中的性能分析","authors":"S. Bhattacharyya, A. Khasnobish, Somsirsa Chatterjee, A. Konar, D. Tibarewala","doi":"10.1109/ICSMB.2010.5735358","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Brain Computer Interface (BCI) improve the lifestyle of the normal people by enhancing their performance levels. It also provides a way of communication for the disabled people with their surrounding who are otherwise unable to physically communicate. BCI can be used to control computers, robots, prosthetic devices and other assistive technologies for rehabilitation. The dataset used for this study has been obtained from the BCI competition II 2003 databank provided by the University of Technology, Graz. After pre-processing of the signals from their electrodes (C3 & C4), the wavelet coefficients, Power Spectral Density of the alpha and the central beta band and the average power of the respective bands have been employed as features for classification. In one of the approaches we fed all the extracted features individually and in the other approach we considered all features together and submitted them to LDA, QDA and KNN algorithms distinctly to classify left and right limb movement. The aim of this study is to analyze the performance of linear discriminant analysis (LDA), quadratic discriminant analysis (QDA) and K-nearest neighbor (KNN) algorithms in differentiating the raw EEG data obtained, into their associative movement, namely, left-right movement. Also the importance of the feature vectors selected is highlighted in this study. The total set to feature vector comprising all the features (i.e., wavelet coefficients, PSD and average band power estimate) performed better with the classifiers without much deviation in the classification accuracy, i.e., 80%, 80% and 75.71% with LDA, QDA and KNN respectively. Wavelet coefficients performed best with QDA classifier with an accuracy of 80%. PSD vector resulted in superior performance of 81.43% with both QDA and KNN. Average band power estimate vector showed highest accuracy of 84.29% with KNN algorithm. Our approach presented in this paper is quite simple, easy to execute and is validated robustly with a large dataset.","PeriodicalId":297136,"journal":{"name":"2010 International Conference on Systems in Medicine and Biology","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"115","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance analysis of LDA, QDA and KNN algorithms in left-right limb movement classification from EEG data\",\"authors\":\"S. Bhattacharyya, A. Khasnobish, Somsirsa Chatterjee, A. Konar, D. Tibarewala\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICSMB.2010.5735358\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Brain Computer Interface (BCI) improve the lifestyle of the normal people by enhancing their performance levels. It also provides a way of communication for the disabled people with their surrounding who are otherwise unable to physically communicate. BCI can be used to control computers, robots, prosthetic devices and other assistive technologies for rehabilitation. The dataset used for this study has been obtained from the BCI competition II 2003 databank provided by the University of Technology, Graz. After pre-processing of the signals from their electrodes (C3 & C4), the wavelet coefficients, Power Spectral Density of the alpha and the central beta band and the average power of the respective bands have been employed as features for classification. In one of the approaches we fed all the extracted features individually and in the other approach we considered all features together and submitted them to LDA, QDA and KNN algorithms distinctly to classify left and right limb movement. The aim of this study is to analyze the performance of linear discriminant analysis (LDA), quadratic discriminant analysis (QDA) and K-nearest neighbor (KNN) algorithms in differentiating the raw EEG data obtained, into their associative movement, namely, left-right movement. Also the importance of the feature vectors selected is highlighted in this study. The total set to feature vector comprising all the features (i.e., wavelet coefficients, PSD and average band power estimate) performed better with the classifiers without much deviation in the classification accuracy, i.e., 80%, 80% and 75.71% with LDA, QDA and KNN respectively. Wavelet coefficients performed best with QDA classifier with an accuracy of 80%. PSD vector resulted in superior performance of 81.43% with both QDA and KNN. Average band power estimate vector showed highest accuracy of 84.29% with KNN algorithm. Our approach presented in this paper is quite simple, easy to execute and is validated robustly with a large dataset.\",\"PeriodicalId\":297136,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2010 International Conference on Systems in Medicine and Biology\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"115\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2010 International Conference on Systems in Medicine and Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSMB.2010.5735358\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2010 International Conference on Systems in Medicine and Biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSMB.2010.5735358","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 115

摘要

脑机接口(BCI)通过提高正常人的工作水平来改善他们的生活方式。它还为残疾人提供了一种与周围无法进行身体交流的人交流的方式。脑机接口可用于控制计算机、机器人、假肢装置和其他辅助康复技术。本研究使用的数据集来自格拉茨科技大学提供的2003年BCI竞赛数据库。在对其电极(C3和C4)的信号进行预处理后,采用小波系数、α和中心β波段的功率谱密度以及各自波段的平均功率作为特征进行分类。在一种方法中,我们单独输入所有提取的特征,在另一种方法中,我们将所有特征放在一起考虑,并将它们分别提交给LDA, QDA和KNN算法,以对左右肢体运动进行分类。本研究的目的是分析线性判别分析(LDA)、二次判别分析(QDA)和k近邻(KNN)算法在将获得的原始EEG数据区分为它们的关联运动,即左右运动方面的性能。此外,本研究还强调了所选择的特征向量的重要性。由所有特征(即小波系数、PSD和平均频带功率估计)组成的特征向量的总集合在分类器上表现较好,分类准确率在没有太大偏差的情况下,LDA、QDA和KNN的分类准确率分别为80%、80%和75.71%。小波系数在QDA分类器中表现最好,准确率为80%。PSD载体在QDA和KNN上的表现均为81.43%。KNN算法的平均频带功率估计精度最高,达到84.29%。本文提出的方法非常简单,易于执行,并通过大型数据集进行了鲁棒性验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Performance analysis of LDA, QDA and KNN algorithms in left-right limb movement classification from EEG data
Brain Computer Interface (BCI) improve the lifestyle of the normal people by enhancing their performance levels. It also provides a way of communication for the disabled people with their surrounding who are otherwise unable to physically communicate. BCI can be used to control computers, robots, prosthetic devices and other assistive technologies for rehabilitation. The dataset used for this study has been obtained from the BCI competition II 2003 databank provided by the University of Technology, Graz. After pre-processing of the signals from their electrodes (C3 & C4), the wavelet coefficients, Power Spectral Density of the alpha and the central beta band and the average power of the respective bands have been employed as features for classification. In one of the approaches we fed all the extracted features individually and in the other approach we considered all features together and submitted them to LDA, QDA and KNN algorithms distinctly to classify left and right limb movement. The aim of this study is to analyze the performance of linear discriminant analysis (LDA), quadratic discriminant analysis (QDA) and K-nearest neighbor (KNN) algorithms in differentiating the raw EEG data obtained, into their associative movement, namely, left-right movement. Also the importance of the feature vectors selected is highlighted in this study. The total set to feature vector comprising all the features (i.e., wavelet coefficients, PSD and average band power estimate) performed better with the classifiers without much deviation in the classification accuracy, i.e., 80%, 80% and 75.71% with LDA, QDA and KNN respectively. Wavelet coefficients performed best with QDA classifier with an accuracy of 80%. PSD vector resulted in superior performance of 81.43% with both QDA and KNN. Average band power estimate vector showed highest accuracy of 84.29% with KNN algorithm. Our approach presented in this paper is quite simple, easy to execute and is validated robustly with a large dataset.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信