欺诈交易检测方法的比较分析

I. Kondratev, V. Bazanov, Daniil A. Uskov, Anna V. Kuchebo, Tatyana E. Sereda
{"title":"欺诈交易检测方法的比较分析","authors":"I. Kondratev, V. Bazanov, Daniil A. Uskov, Anna V. Kuchebo, Tatyana E. Sereda","doi":"10.1109/ElConRus51938.2021.9396074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article is focused on the comparative analysis of machine learning models used to identify fraudulent transactions. During the research, models of three different algorithms were considered, and their optimization for the task was performed. The accuracy of the models was compared, the advantages and disadvantages of each model were identified, recommendations for their use were given, and conclusions were drawn. The experiment was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of various machine learning models in transaction classification problems.","PeriodicalId":447345,"journal":{"name":"2021 IEEE Conference of Russian Young Researchers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering (ElConRus)","volume":"265 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Analysis of Methods for Detecting Fraudulent Transactions\",\"authors\":\"I. Kondratev, V. Bazanov, Daniil A. Uskov, Anna V. Kuchebo, Tatyana E. Sereda\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ElConRus51938.2021.9396074\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article is focused on the comparative analysis of machine learning models used to identify fraudulent transactions. During the research, models of three different algorithms were considered, and their optimization for the task was performed. The accuracy of the models was compared, the advantages and disadvantages of each model were identified, recommendations for their use were given, and conclusions were drawn. The experiment was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of various machine learning models in transaction classification problems.\",\"PeriodicalId\":447345,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 IEEE Conference of Russian Young Researchers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering (ElConRus)\",\"volume\":\"265 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 IEEE Conference of Russian Young Researchers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering (ElConRus)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ElConRus51938.2021.9396074\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 IEEE Conference of Russian Young Researchers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering (ElConRus)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ElConRus51938.2021.9396074","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文的重点是用于识别欺诈性交易的机器学习模型的比较分析。在研究过程中,考虑了三种不同算法的模型,并针对任务进行了优化。比较了模型的准确性,确定了每种模型的优缺点,给出了使用建议,并得出了结论。本实验旨在评估各种机器学习模型在事务分类问题中的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative Analysis of Methods for Detecting Fraudulent Transactions
This article is focused on the comparative analysis of machine learning models used to identify fraudulent transactions. During the research, models of three different algorithms were considered, and their optimization for the task was performed. The accuracy of the models was compared, the advantages and disadvantages of each model were identified, recommendations for their use were given, and conclusions were drawn. The experiment was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of various machine learning models in transaction classification problems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信