三种不同的总统权力

M. W. McConnell
{"title":"三种不同的总统权力","authors":"M. W. McConnell","doi":"10.2307/j.ctv11hprfg.20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter reviews Article II's organization according to the nature of presidential powers: prerogative powers, qualified prerogative powers, powers or duties involving limited discretion, defeasible residual powers, or delegated powers. It analyzes the structure of Article II by two key variables: whether a presidential power derives from the Constitution or a statute, and whether it is defeasible or not. It also mentions Justice Robert Jackson's three-part framework in his concurrence in the Steel Seizure Case, which was adopted by a unanimous Court in Dames & Moore v. Regan. The chapter considers the Steel Seizure concurrence as a prime reason modern separation of powers jurisprudence is in disarray. It cites Jackson's claim that presidential powers are not fixed, but fluctuate, depending upon their disjunction or conjunction with those of Congress.","PeriodicalId":252767,"journal":{"name":"The President Who Would Not Be King","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Three Varieties of Presidential Power\",\"authors\":\"M. W. McConnell\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/j.ctv11hprfg.20\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter reviews Article II's organization according to the nature of presidential powers: prerogative powers, qualified prerogative powers, powers or duties involving limited discretion, defeasible residual powers, or delegated powers. It analyzes the structure of Article II by two key variables: whether a presidential power derives from the Constitution or a statute, and whether it is defeasible or not. It also mentions Justice Robert Jackson's three-part framework in his concurrence in the Steel Seizure Case, which was adopted by a unanimous Court in Dames & Moore v. Regan. The chapter considers the Steel Seizure concurrence as a prime reason modern separation of powers jurisprudence is in disarray. It cites Jackson's claim that presidential powers are not fixed, but fluctuate, depending upon their disjunction or conjunction with those of Congress.\",\"PeriodicalId\":252767,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The President Who Would Not Be King\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The President Who Would Not Be King\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv11hprfg.20\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The President Who Would Not Be King","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv11hprfg.20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本章根据总统权力的性质:特权、有条件的特权、涉及有限自由裁量权的权力或职责、可撤销的剩余权力或委托权力来审查第二条的组织。它通过两个关键变量来分析第2条的结构:总统权力是来自宪法还是成文法,以及总统权力是否可以被推翻。它还提到了罗伯特·杰克逊法官在他对钢铁扣押案的同意中提出的三部分框架,该框架在达姆斯和摩尔诉里根案中被一致通过。本章认为钢铁扣押合并性是现代三权分立法理陷入混乱的主要原因。它引用了杰克逊的说法,即总统的权力不是固定的,而是波动的,取决于他们与国会的权力的分离或结合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Three Varieties of Presidential Power
This chapter reviews Article II's organization according to the nature of presidential powers: prerogative powers, qualified prerogative powers, powers or duties involving limited discretion, defeasible residual powers, or delegated powers. It analyzes the structure of Article II by two key variables: whether a presidential power derives from the Constitution or a statute, and whether it is defeasible or not. It also mentions Justice Robert Jackson's three-part framework in his concurrence in the Steel Seizure Case, which was adopted by a unanimous Court in Dames & Moore v. Regan. The chapter considers the Steel Seizure concurrence as a prime reason modern separation of powers jurisprudence is in disarray. It cites Jackson's claim that presidential powers are not fixed, but fluctuate, depending upon their disjunction or conjunction with those of Congress.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信