{"title":"承认和执行外国临时命令在美国:走向一个实用的解决方案","authors":"S. Nathan Park","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2824699","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Currently, the United States law lacks a coherent mechanism for providing recognition to, and allowing enforcement of, provisional orders issued by a foreign court. This paper argues for establishing a system for recognition and enforcement of foreign provisional orders in the United States. Such a system would confer three main benefits: (1) enhanced efficiency of transnational litigation in the U.S. courts; (2) appropriate allocation of judicial resource between U.S. and foreign courts that would promote both constitutional rights and judicial efficiency, and; (3) creation of the U.S.-led ecosystem of private international law. This paper then examines the three possible paths of establishing the system of foreign provisional order recognition: judicial, legislative, and treaty-based. Although all three paths are viable, this paper argues that the treaty-based option provides the maximum flexibility necessary to reap the triple benefits of having a legal mechanism for recognition and enforcement of foreign provisional orders.","PeriodicalId":113747,"journal":{"name":"Litigation & Procedure eJournal","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Provisional Orders in the United States: Toward a Practical Solution\",\"authors\":\"S. Nathan Park\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2824699\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Currently, the United States law lacks a coherent mechanism for providing recognition to, and allowing enforcement of, provisional orders issued by a foreign court. This paper argues for establishing a system for recognition and enforcement of foreign provisional orders in the United States. Such a system would confer three main benefits: (1) enhanced efficiency of transnational litigation in the U.S. courts; (2) appropriate allocation of judicial resource between U.S. and foreign courts that would promote both constitutional rights and judicial efficiency, and; (3) creation of the U.S.-led ecosystem of private international law. This paper then examines the three possible paths of establishing the system of foreign provisional order recognition: judicial, legislative, and treaty-based. Although all three paths are viable, this paper argues that the treaty-based option provides the maximum flexibility necessary to reap the triple benefits of having a legal mechanism for recognition and enforcement of foreign provisional orders.\",\"PeriodicalId\":113747,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Litigation & Procedure eJournal\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-02-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Litigation & Procedure eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2824699\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Litigation & Procedure eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2824699","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Provisional Orders in the United States: Toward a Practical Solution
Currently, the United States law lacks a coherent mechanism for providing recognition to, and allowing enforcement of, provisional orders issued by a foreign court. This paper argues for establishing a system for recognition and enforcement of foreign provisional orders in the United States. Such a system would confer three main benefits: (1) enhanced efficiency of transnational litigation in the U.S. courts; (2) appropriate allocation of judicial resource between U.S. and foreign courts that would promote both constitutional rights and judicial efficiency, and; (3) creation of the U.S.-led ecosystem of private international law. This paper then examines the three possible paths of establishing the system of foreign provisional order recognition: judicial, legislative, and treaty-based. Although all three paths are viable, this paper argues that the treaty-based option provides the maximum flexibility necessary to reap the triple benefits of having a legal mechanism for recognition and enforcement of foreign provisional orders.