{"title":"法律中的例外","authors":"J. Kysela","doi":"10.5771/9783845298610-101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Thomas Poole introduces his interesting book on the reason of state and prerogative by defining legal exceptionalism as a thematization of exceptional powers in crisis situations. He relates this concept to three different, albeit related, phenomena: a) emergency powers, b) state of exception, and c) prerogative. He examines each of these in relation to his main object of interest, the reason of state.1 I consider it useful to give more general thought to exceptionality in law in a book devoted to states of exception. But let us begin with a brief note on the exceptionality of law.","PeriodicalId":371523,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Powers","volume":"101 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exceptionality in Law\",\"authors\":\"J. Kysela\",\"doi\":\"10.5771/9783845298610-101\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Thomas Poole introduces his interesting book on the reason of state and prerogative by defining legal exceptionalism as a thematization of exceptional powers in crisis situations. He relates this concept to three different, albeit related, phenomena: a) emergency powers, b) state of exception, and c) prerogative. He examines each of these in relation to his main object of interest, the reason of state.1 I consider it useful to give more general thought to exceptionality in law in a book devoted to states of exception. But let us begin with a brief note on the exceptionality of law.\",\"PeriodicalId\":371523,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Emergency Powers\",\"volume\":\"101 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Emergency Powers\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845298610-101\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency Powers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845298610-101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
Thomas Poole通过将法律例外主义定义为危机情况下特殊权力的主题化,介绍了他关于国家和特权的原因的有趣的书。他将这一概念与三种不同但又相关的现象联系起来:a)紧急权力,b)例外状态,c)特权。他根据他主要感兴趣的对象,即状态理性,来考察每一个问题我认为,在一本专门讨论例外状态的书中,对法律中的例外进行更普遍的思考是有益的。但是,让我们先简要说明一下法律的例外性。
Thomas Poole introduces his interesting book on the reason of state and prerogative by defining legal exceptionalism as a thematization of exceptional powers in crisis situations. He relates this concept to three different, albeit related, phenomena: a) emergency powers, b) state of exception, and c) prerogative. He examines each of these in relation to his main object of interest, the reason of state.1 I consider it useful to give more general thought to exceptionality in law in a book devoted to states of exception. But let us begin with a brief note on the exceptionality of law.