阿拉伯学者关于伊卜努Fāris词典的派生之争Maqāyīs Al-Luġah

Anas Abdul Fattah Elgmati, A. Hassan, Mohd Azidan Abdul Jabar
{"title":"阿拉伯学者关于伊卜努Fāris词典的派生之争Maqāyīs Al-Luġah","authors":"Anas Abdul Fattah Elgmati, A. Hassan, Mohd Azidan Abdul Jabar","doi":"10.47836/pjssh.31.2.18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Dictionary Maqāyīs al-Luġah, developed by Ibnu Fāris (d.395H/1004A.D), is one of the most applicable dictionaries in the Arabic language, relying on the idea of derivation in its construction. Some Arabic linguists argue that derivation in the dictionary is a semantic derivation, whereas others claim it is verbal. Al-Suyuti sees small as the only type of derivation. Meanwhile, Muḥammad Jabal states that axial semantics derivation is what the Ibnu Fāris dictionary was built on. This study examines the lack of consensus among linguists on the derivation basis of Ibnu Fāris’ dictionary (d.395H/1004A.D) proposed by al-Zajjāj (d.311H/923A.D), who defined Derivation as “every two words that share common letters.” On the other hand, al-Ramani (d.384H/994A.D) defined it terminologically as “deducting a branch from an origin.” This disagreement over derivation concepts sparked a debate among Arabic linguistic scholars, particularly in determining the type compatible with the derivation concept. It is inconclusive which derivation was applied in building Ibnu Faris’ Dictionary. Thus, the current study was proposed in response to the ongoing controversy. This research applied the descriptive approach. Based on the selected corpus, this study explored small derivation and axial semantics types compatible with the derivation concept, and both types were found in the dictionary. Small derivation meets the derivation criteria in terms of construction, order, and broad connotation, whereas axial semantics controls the internal semantic framework of the linguistic root. Other non-derivations, such as big, bigger, and biggest, are also deemed linguistic phenomena.","PeriodicalId":125431,"journal":{"name":"Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Derivation Contestations Among Arab Scholars Regarding Ibnu Fāris’s Dictionary Maqāyīs Al-Luġah\",\"authors\":\"Anas Abdul Fattah Elgmati, A. Hassan, Mohd Azidan Abdul Jabar\",\"doi\":\"10.47836/pjssh.31.2.18\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Dictionary Maqāyīs al-Luġah, developed by Ibnu Fāris (d.395H/1004A.D), is one of the most applicable dictionaries in the Arabic language, relying on the idea of derivation in its construction. Some Arabic linguists argue that derivation in the dictionary is a semantic derivation, whereas others claim it is verbal. Al-Suyuti sees small as the only type of derivation. Meanwhile, Muḥammad Jabal states that axial semantics derivation is what the Ibnu Fāris dictionary was built on. This study examines the lack of consensus among linguists on the derivation basis of Ibnu Fāris’ dictionary (d.395H/1004A.D) proposed by al-Zajjāj (d.311H/923A.D), who defined Derivation as “every two words that share common letters.” On the other hand, al-Ramani (d.384H/994A.D) defined it terminologically as “deducting a branch from an origin.” This disagreement over derivation concepts sparked a debate among Arabic linguistic scholars, particularly in determining the type compatible with the derivation concept. It is inconclusive which derivation was applied in building Ibnu Faris’ Dictionary. Thus, the current study was proposed in response to the ongoing controversy. This research applied the descriptive approach. Based on the selected corpus, this study explored small derivation and axial semantics types compatible with the derivation concept, and both types were found in the dictionary. Small derivation meets the derivation criteria in terms of construction, order, and broad connotation, whereas axial semantics controls the internal semantic framework of the linguistic root. Other non-derivations, such as big, bigger, and biggest, are also deemed linguistic phenomena.\",\"PeriodicalId\":125431,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47836/pjssh.31.2.18\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47836/pjssh.31.2.18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由Ibnu Fāris (d.395H/ 1004ad)开发的词典Maqāyīs al-Luġah是阿拉伯语中最适用的词典之一,它的结构依赖于派生的思想。一些阿拉伯语言学家认为,词典中的派生是语义派生,而另一些人则认为它是口头派生。Al-Suyuti认为小是唯一的派生类型。同时,Muḥammad Jabal指出轴向语义派生是Ibnu Fāris字典的构建基础。本研究考察了语言学家对al-Zajjāj (d.311H/923A.D)提出的Ibnu Fāris词典(d.395H/1004A.D .)的派生基础缺乏共识,该词典将派生定义为“每两个具有共同字母的单词”。另一方面,al-Ramani(公元384h /公元994年)将其定义为“从起源中演绎出分支”。这种派生概念的分歧引发了阿拉伯语学者之间的争论,特别是在确定与派生概念相容的类型方面。在构建Ibnu Faris的词典时使用了哪个衍生词是不确定的。因此,本研究的提出是为了回应持续的争议。本研究采用描述性方法。基于选取的语料库,本研究探索了与派生概念兼容的小派生和轴向语义类型,并在词典中找到了这两种类型。小派生在结构、顺序和广泛内涵上满足派生标准,而轴向语义控制着语言根的内部语义框架。其他非衍生词,如big、bigger和biggest,也被认为是语言现象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Derivation Contestations Among Arab Scholars Regarding Ibnu Fāris’s Dictionary Maqāyīs Al-Luġah
The Dictionary Maqāyīs al-Luġah, developed by Ibnu Fāris (d.395H/1004A.D), is one of the most applicable dictionaries in the Arabic language, relying on the idea of derivation in its construction. Some Arabic linguists argue that derivation in the dictionary is a semantic derivation, whereas others claim it is verbal. Al-Suyuti sees small as the only type of derivation. Meanwhile, Muḥammad Jabal states that axial semantics derivation is what the Ibnu Fāris dictionary was built on. This study examines the lack of consensus among linguists on the derivation basis of Ibnu Fāris’ dictionary (d.395H/1004A.D) proposed by al-Zajjāj (d.311H/923A.D), who defined Derivation as “every two words that share common letters.” On the other hand, al-Ramani (d.384H/994A.D) defined it terminologically as “deducting a branch from an origin.” This disagreement over derivation concepts sparked a debate among Arabic linguistic scholars, particularly in determining the type compatible with the derivation concept. It is inconclusive which derivation was applied in building Ibnu Faris’ Dictionary. Thus, the current study was proposed in response to the ongoing controversy. This research applied the descriptive approach. Based on the selected corpus, this study explored small derivation and axial semantics types compatible with the derivation concept, and both types were found in the dictionary. Small derivation meets the derivation criteria in terms of construction, order, and broad connotation, whereas axial semantics controls the internal semantic framework of the linguistic root. Other non-derivations, such as big, bigger, and biggest, are also deemed linguistic phenomena.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信