用弹塑性断裂力学分析反应堆容器喷嘴内半径断裂

S. Marlette
{"title":"用弹塑性断裂力学分析反应堆容器喷嘴内半径断裂","authors":"S. Marlette","doi":"10.1115/PVP2018-85130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) published Section XI Code Case N-648-1 [1] in order to provide alternative examinations of reactor vessel nozzle inner radii. The Code Case was created because ultrasonic examination of the inner radius regions of reactor vessels nozzles is not practical within the operating fleet and the likelihood of flaws developing within these locations is extremely low. Justification for using alternative visual examinations was provided in a paper published at the 2001 Pressure Vessel and Piping (PVP) Technology Conference [2]. This 2001 PVP paper used linear elastic fracture mechanics (LEFM) to demonstrate tolerance for flaws significantly larger than would be detected using nondestructive examination techniques.\n However, the Code Case [1] and PVP paper [2] were only applicable to operating plants in the United States. Thus, there was a need to provide a similar fracture analysis considering the AP1000® design to support elimination of volumetric examinations of the nozzle inner radius regions. It was also important to consider improvements in facture mechanics techniques that have been recently published in the ASME Code. The ductile behavior of the material at operating temperatures allow for the use of elastic plastic fracture mechanics (EPFM) methods which provides significantly improved flaw tolerance results. This paper compares results from analyses using LEFM and the EPFM methods for the AP1000 reactor vessel nozzle inner radii region and demonstrates tolerance for large flaws within these regions in order to support a basis for elimination of volumetric inspection during in-service and pre-service examination for the AP1000 design.","PeriodicalId":128383,"journal":{"name":"Volume 1A: Codes and Standards","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reactor Vessel Nozzle Inner Radius Fracture Analyses Using Elastic-Plastic Fracture Mechanics\",\"authors\":\"S. Marlette\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/PVP2018-85130\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) published Section XI Code Case N-648-1 [1] in order to provide alternative examinations of reactor vessel nozzle inner radii. The Code Case was created because ultrasonic examination of the inner radius regions of reactor vessels nozzles is not practical within the operating fleet and the likelihood of flaws developing within these locations is extremely low. Justification for using alternative visual examinations was provided in a paper published at the 2001 Pressure Vessel and Piping (PVP) Technology Conference [2]. This 2001 PVP paper used linear elastic fracture mechanics (LEFM) to demonstrate tolerance for flaws significantly larger than would be detected using nondestructive examination techniques.\\n However, the Code Case [1] and PVP paper [2] were only applicable to operating plants in the United States. Thus, there was a need to provide a similar fracture analysis considering the AP1000® design to support elimination of volumetric examinations of the nozzle inner radius regions. It was also important to consider improvements in facture mechanics techniques that have been recently published in the ASME Code. The ductile behavior of the material at operating temperatures allow for the use of elastic plastic fracture mechanics (EPFM) methods which provides significantly improved flaw tolerance results. This paper compares results from analyses using LEFM and the EPFM methods for the AP1000 reactor vessel nozzle inner radii region and demonstrates tolerance for large flaws within these regions in order to support a basis for elimination of volumetric inspection during in-service and pre-service examination for the AP1000 design.\",\"PeriodicalId\":128383,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Volume 1A: Codes and Standards\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Volume 1A: Codes and Standards\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/PVP2018-85130\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 1A: Codes and Standards","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/PVP2018-85130","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

之所以创建代码案例,是因为在运行的机组中,对反应堆容器喷嘴内半径区域进行超声波检查是不切实际的,而且在这些位置发生缺陷的可能性极低。在2001年压力容器和管道(PVP)技术会议上发表的一篇论文提供了使用替代目视检查的理由[2]。这篇2001年的PVP论文使用了线弹性断裂力学(LEFM)来证明比使用无损检测技术检测到的缺陷更大的容忍度。然而,Code Case[1]和PVP论文[2]仅适用于美国的运营工厂。因此,考虑到AP1000®的设计,需要提供类似的断裂分析,以支持消除喷嘴内半径区域的体积检查。考虑最近在ASME规范中发布的制造力学技术的改进也很重要。材料在工作温度下的延性行为允许使用弹塑性断裂力学(EPFM)方法,从而提供显着改善的缺陷容限结果。本文比较了使用LEFM和EPFM方法对AP1000反应堆容器喷嘴内半径区域的分析结果,并证明了这些区域对大缺陷的容错性,以支持在AP1000设计的服役和服役前检查中消除体积检查的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reactor Vessel Nozzle Inner Radius Fracture Analyses Using Elastic-Plastic Fracture Mechanics
The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) published Section XI Code Case N-648-1 [1] in order to provide alternative examinations of reactor vessel nozzle inner radii. The Code Case was created because ultrasonic examination of the inner radius regions of reactor vessels nozzles is not practical within the operating fleet and the likelihood of flaws developing within these locations is extremely low. Justification for using alternative visual examinations was provided in a paper published at the 2001 Pressure Vessel and Piping (PVP) Technology Conference [2]. This 2001 PVP paper used linear elastic fracture mechanics (LEFM) to demonstrate tolerance for flaws significantly larger than would be detected using nondestructive examination techniques. However, the Code Case [1] and PVP paper [2] were only applicable to operating plants in the United States. Thus, there was a need to provide a similar fracture analysis considering the AP1000® design to support elimination of volumetric examinations of the nozzle inner radius regions. It was also important to consider improvements in facture mechanics techniques that have been recently published in the ASME Code. The ductile behavior of the material at operating temperatures allow for the use of elastic plastic fracture mechanics (EPFM) methods which provides significantly improved flaw tolerance results. This paper compares results from analyses using LEFM and the EPFM methods for the AP1000 reactor vessel nozzle inner radii region and demonstrates tolerance for large flaws within these regions in order to support a basis for elimination of volumetric inspection during in-service and pre-service examination for the AP1000 design.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信