{"title":"人工智能在化学真实系统建模中的应用","authors":"M. A. Azqhandi, M. Shekari","doi":"10.5772/INTECHOPEN.75602","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years, discharge of synthetic dye waste from different industries leading to aquatic and environmental pollution is a serious global problem of great concern. Hence, the removal of dye prediction plays an important role in wastewater management and conservation of nature. Artificial intelligence methods are popular owing due to its ease of use and high level of accuracy. This chapter proposes a detailed review of artificial intelligence-based removal dye prediction methods particularly multiple linear regression (MLR), artificial neural networks (ANNs), and least squares-support vector machine (LS-SVM). Furthermore, this chapter will focus on ensemble prediction models (EPMs) used for removal dye prediction. EPMs improve the prediction accuracy by integrating several prediction models. The principles, advantages, disadvantages, and applications of these artificial intelligence-based methods are explained in this chapter. Furthermore, future directions of the research on artificial intelligence-based removal dye prediction methods are discussed. process [49], Fenton process [50], and adsorption [51] by applying ANNs. M. Ahmadi and Kh. Naderi applied general regression neural network (GRNN) to predict the removal of methylene blue (MB) and Basic Yellow 28 (BY28) from aqueous solution. Their findings indicated that a well-designed GRNN is able to predict the removal of azo dye based on sonication time, initial dye concentration, and adsorbent mass. Ahmadi and J. Pooralhossini used backpropagation neural network (BPNN) to predict the decolorization of sunset yellow (SY) and disulfine blue (DB) [52]. The obtained results show that the BPNN model outperforms the classical statistical model in terms of R 2 , RMSE, MAE, and AAD for both dyes. Ahmadi and team used BPNN to predict the efficiency of two carcinogenic dye (methylene blue (MB) and malachite green (MG)) adsorption onto Mn@ CuS/ZnS nanocomposite-loaded activated carbon (Mn@ CuS/ZnS-NC-AC) as a novel adsorbent to identify the model parameters in order to improve the prediction performance [35]. Ahmadi and Dastkhoon used neural network to predict Safranin-O (SO) and indigo car-mine (IC) adsorption onto Ni:FeO(OH)-NWs-AC. In this work, the influence of process variables (initial dye concentration, adsorbent mass, and sonication time) on the removal of both dyes was investigated by central composite rotatable design (CCRD) of RSM, multilayer per-ceptron (MLP) neural network, and Doolittle factorization algorithm (DFA). The ANN model","PeriodicalId":442318,"journal":{"name":"Artificial Intelligence - Emerging Trends and Applications","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Application of AI in Modeling of Real System in Chemistry\",\"authors\":\"M. A. Azqhandi, M. Shekari\",\"doi\":\"10.5772/INTECHOPEN.75602\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In recent years, discharge of synthetic dye waste from different industries leading to aquatic and environmental pollution is a serious global problem of great concern. Hence, the removal of dye prediction plays an important role in wastewater management and conservation of nature. Artificial intelligence methods are popular owing due to its ease of use and high level of accuracy. This chapter proposes a detailed review of artificial intelligence-based removal dye prediction methods particularly multiple linear regression (MLR), artificial neural networks (ANNs), and least squares-support vector machine (LS-SVM). Furthermore, this chapter will focus on ensemble prediction models (EPMs) used for removal dye prediction. EPMs improve the prediction accuracy by integrating several prediction models. The principles, advantages, disadvantages, and applications of these artificial intelligence-based methods are explained in this chapter. Furthermore, future directions of the research on artificial intelligence-based removal dye prediction methods are discussed. process [49], Fenton process [50], and adsorption [51] by applying ANNs. M. Ahmadi and Kh. Naderi applied general regression neural network (GRNN) to predict the removal of methylene blue (MB) and Basic Yellow 28 (BY28) from aqueous solution. Their findings indicated that a well-designed GRNN is able to predict the removal of azo dye based on sonication time, initial dye concentration, and adsorbent mass. Ahmadi and J. Pooralhossini used backpropagation neural network (BPNN) to predict the decolorization of sunset yellow (SY) and disulfine blue (DB) [52]. The obtained results show that the BPNN model outperforms the classical statistical model in terms of R 2 , RMSE, MAE, and AAD for both dyes. Ahmadi and team used BPNN to predict the efficiency of two carcinogenic dye (methylene blue (MB) and malachite green (MG)) adsorption onto Mn@ CuS/ZnS nanocomposite-loaded activated carbon (Mn@ CuS/ZnS-NC-AC) as a novel adsorbent to identify the model parameters in order to improve the prediction performance [35]. Ahmadi and Dastkhoon used neural network to predict Safranin-O (SO) and indigo car-mine (IC) adsorption onto Ni:FeO(OH)-NWs-AC. In this work, the influence of process variables (initial dye concentration, adsorbent mass, and sonication time) on the removal of both dyes was investigated by central composite rotatable design (CCRD) of RSM, multilayer per-ceptron (MLP) neural network, and Doolittle factorization algorithm (DFA). The ANN model\",\"PeriodicalId\":442318,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Artificial Intelligence - Emerging Trends and Applications\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Artificial Intelligence - Emerging Trends and Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5772/INTECHOPEN.75602\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Artificial Intelligence - Emerging Trends and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5772/INTECHOPEN.75602","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8
摘要
近年来,不同行业的合成染料废水排放造成的水体和环境污染是一个备受关注的全球性问题。因此,染料去除率预测在废水管理和自然保护中发挥着重要作用。人工智能方法因其易于使用和高水平的准确性而受到欢迎。本章详细回顾了基于人工智能的去除染料预测方法,特别是多元线性回归(MLR)、人工神经网络(ANNs)和最小二乘支持向量机(LS-SVM)。此外,本章将重点介绍用于去除染料预测的集合预测模型(epm)。epm通过集成多个预测模型来提高预测精度。本章解释了这些基于人工智能的方法的原理、优缺点和应用。展望了基于人工智能的去除率染料预测方法的未来研究方向。[49]工艺,Fenton工艺[50],以及应用人工神经网络吸附[51]。艾哈迈迪先生和赫。Naderi应用广义回归神经网络(GRNN)预测了水溶液中亚甲基蓝(MB)和碱性黄28 (BY28)的去除效果。他们的研究结果表明,设计良好的GRNN能够根据超声时间、初始染料浓度和吸附剂质量来预测偶氮染料的去除。Ahmadi和J. Pooralhossini利用反向传播神经网络(BPNN)预测了日落黄(SY)和二硫胺蓝(DB)[52]的脱色效果。结果表明,BPNN模型在两种染料的r2、RMSE、MAE和AAD方面都优于经典统计模型。Ahmadi和团队利用BPNN预测了两种致癌染料(亚甲基蓝(MB)和孔雀石绿(MG))在Mn@ cu /ZnS纳米复合负载活性炭(Mn@ cu /ZnS- nc - ac)上作为新型吸附剂的吸附效率,以确定模型参数,以提高预测性能[35]。Ahmadi和Dastkhoon利用神经网络预测了Safranin-O (SO)和靛蓝car-mine (IC)在Ni:FeO(OH)-NWs-AC上的吸附。在这项工作中,通过RSM的中心复合旋转设计(CCRD)、多层感知器(MLP)神经网络和Doolittle分解算法(DFA)研究了工艺变量(染料初始浓度、吸附剂质量和超声时间)对两种染料去除的影响。人工神经网络模型
Application of AI in Modeling of Real System in Chemistry
In recent years, discharge of synthetic dye waste from different industries leading to aquatic and environmental pollution is a serious global problem of great concern. Hence, the removal of dye prediction plays an important role in wastewater management and conservation of nature. Artificial intelligence methods are popular owing due to its ease of use and high level of accuracy. This chapter proposes a detailed review of artificial intelligence-based removal dye prediction methods particularly multiple linear regression (MLR), artificial neural networks (ANNs), and least squares-support vector machine (LS-SVM). Furthermore, this chapter will focus on ensemble prediction models (EPMs) used for removal dye prediction. EPMs improve the prediction accuracy by integrating several prediction models. The principles, advantages, disadvantages, and applications of these artificial intelligence-based methods are explained in this chapter. Furthermore, future directions of the research on artificial intelligence-based removal dye prediction methods are discussed. process [49], Fenton process [50], and adsorption [51] by applying ANNs. M. Ahmadi and Kh. Naderi applied general regression neural network (GRNN) to predict the removal of methylene blue (MB) and Basic Yellow 28 (BY28) from aqueous solution. Their findings indicated that a well-designed GRNN is able to predict the removal of azo dye based on sonication time, initial dye concentration, and adsorbent mass. Ahmadi and J. Pooralhossini used backpropagation neural network (BPNN) to predict the decolorization of sunset yellow (SY) and disulfine blue (DB) [52]. The obtained results show that the BPNN model outperforms the classical statistical model in terms of R 2 , RMSE, MAE, and AAD for both dyes. Ahmadi and team used BPNN to predict the efficiency of two carcinogenic dye (methylene blue (MB) and malachite green (MG)) adsorption onto Mn@ CuS/ZnS nanocomposite-loaded activated carbon (Mn@ CuS/ZnS-NC-AC) as a novel adsorbent to identify the model parameters in order to improve the prediction performance [35]. Ahmadi and Dastkhoon used neural network to predict Safranin-O (SO) and indigo car-mine (IC) adsorption onto Ni:FeO(OH)-NWs-AC. In this work, the influence of process variables (initial dye concentration, adsorbent mass, and sonication time) on the removal of both dyes was investigated by central composite rotatable design (CCRD) of RSM, multilayer per-ceptron (MLP) neural network, and Doolittle factorization algorithm (DFA). The ANN model