环境与损失概论

Ana Baginski, C. Malcolm, E. Trapp
{"title":"环境与损失概论","authors":"Ana Baginski, C. Malcolm, E. Trapp","doi":"10.3138/ycl-64-010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:In this introduction, the authors lay out the problem of an environmental consciousness that is grounded in a logic of recuperability, one that foregrounds the environment as an “object” external to human experience. The introduction shows how discourses of grief, mourning, and disaster are anthropocentric in the sense that they find and perceive the conflicts that go under the name “climate crisis” as always first in the external environment. In a counterintuitive way, this holding outside of human experience names destruction in the external environment as relatable only to the extent that it bears the imprint of human activity. On this model, attempts to show the intensification of loss continually misrecognize the work that the environment does to provide structures of continuity and the thought of the unconscious or inaccessible. Without this, climate breakdown is figured within an economy of “overrepresentation,” where no one can be outside it. The effect is to prioritize a racialized libidinal economy that projects proximity to crisis as always elsewhere and which then seeks “natural” figures for annihilation that testify to imminent extinction. The nonhuman, as paradoxically outside, but nevertheless within, the scope of regulation, is therefore always subtended by a racializing logic of availability. Instead, the authors seek to move environmental thinking to a different epistemological frame where what is withdrawn from view, recuperation, and speculation provides the basis for a reorientation to what is otherwise thought of as “past saving.”","PeriodicalId":342699,"journal":{"name":"The Yearbook of Comparative Literature","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Introduction to Environment and Loss\",\"authors\":\"Ana Baginski, C. Malcolm, E. Trapp\",\"doi\":\"10.3138/ycl-64-010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:In this introduction, the authors lay out the problem of an environmental consciousness that is grounded in a logic of recuperability, one that foregrounds the environment as an “object” external to human experience. The introduction shows how discourses of grief, mourning, and disaster are anthropocentric in the sense that they find and perceive the conflicts that go under the name “climate crisis” as always first in the external environment. In a counterintuitive way, this holding outside of human experience names destruction in the external environment as relatable only to the extent that it bears the imprint of human activity. On this model, attempts to show the intensification of loss continually misrecognize the work that the environment does to provide structures of continuity and the thought of the unconscious or inaccessible. Without this, climate breakdown is figured within an economy of “overrepresentation,” where no one can be outside it. The effect is to prioritize a racialized libidinal economy that projects proximity to crisis as always elsewhere and which then seeks “natural” figures for annihilation that testify to imminent extinction. The nonhuman, as paradoxically outside, but nevertheless within, the scope of regulation, is therefore always subtended by a racializing logic of availability. Instead, the authors seek to move environmental thinking to a different epistemological frame where what is withdrawn from view, recuperation, and speculation provides the basis for a reorientation to what is otherwise thought of as “past saving.”\",\"PeriodicalId\":342699,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Yearbook of Comparative Literature\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Yearbook of Comparative Literature\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3138/ycl-64-010\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Yearbook of Comparative Literature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/ycl-64-010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:在这篇引言中,作者提出了基于可再生逻辑的环境意识问题,这种逻辑将环境视为人类经验之外的“对象”。导言显示了悲伤、哀悼和灾难的话语是如何以人类为中心的,因为它们总是首先在外部环境中发现和感知以“气候危机”为名的冲突。以一种违反直觉的方式,这种在人类经验之外的持有,将外部环境中的破坏命名为只有在它带有人类活动印记的程度上才具有相关性。在这个模型中,试图表明损失的加剧不断地误解了环境为提供连续性结构和无意识或不可接近的思想所做的工作。如果没有这一点,气候崩溃就会被认为是一个“代表性过高”的经济体,没有人能在它之外。其结果是优先考虑一种种族化的力比多经济,这种经济像其他地方一样接近危机,然后寻求“自然”的灭绝数字,证明即将灭绝。因此,非人类,矛盾地在监管范围之外,但仍然在监管范围内,总是被一种可用性的种族化逻辑所支持。相反,作者试图将环境思维转移到一个不同的认识论框架中,在这个框架中,从观点、恢复和推测中撤出的东西为重新定位被认为是“过去拯救”的东西提供了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Introduction to Environment and Loss
Abstract:In this introduction, the authors lay out the problem of an environmental consciousness that is grounded in a logic of recuperability, one that foregrounds the environment as an “object” external to human experience. The introduction shows how discourses of grief, mourning, and disaster are anthropocentric in the sense that they find and perceive the conflicts that go under the name “climate crisis” as always first in the external environment. In a counterintuitive way, this holding outside of human experience names destruction in the external environment as relatable only to the extent that it bears the imprint of human activity. On this model, attempts to show the intensification of loss continually misrecognize the work that the environment does to provide structures of continuity and the thought of the unconscious or inaccessible. Without this, climate breakdown is figured within an economy of “overrepresentation,” where no one can be outside it. The effect is to prioritize a racialized libidinal economy that projects proximity to crisis as always elsewhere and which then seeks “natural” figures for annihilation that testify to imminent extinction. The nonhuman, as paradoxically outside, but nevertheless within, the scope of regulation, is therefore always subtended by a racializing logic of availability. Instead, the authors seek to move environmental thinking to a different epistemological frame where what is withdrawn from view, recuperation, and speculation provides the basis for a reorientation to what is otherwise thought of as “past saving.”
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信