反对欧盟贸易政策中的不公平贸易:贸易保护的话语分析

J. Mathieu, Sharon Weinblum
{"title":"反对欧盟贸易政策中的不公平贸易:贸易保护的话语分析","authors":"J. Mathieu, Sharon Weinblum","doi":"10.1080/15705854.2013.785263","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The European Union considers Trade Defence Instruments (i.e., anti-dumping, countervailing duties and safeguards) as a cornerstone of the EU trade policy in the battle against ‘unfair competition from across the globe’. At the same time, the rationale behind these instruments, or the fight against ‘unfair trade practices’, remains somehow woolly. In this article, we argue that it is crucial to unpack the different meanings bestowed on the concept of unfair trade. An interpretative perspective is therefore adopted in order to highlight the complexity behind this notion. The analysis is based on a systematic analysis of the debates revolving around the issue of Trade Defence Instruments held within the European Parliament during the current legislative session. First, we show that a specific storyline on unfair trade can be considered dominant. Second, we expose the ‘kaleidoscopic’ reality behind unfair trade, showing that this notion is a floating signifier. Against this backcloth, the article puts forward the argument that the institutionalisation of Trade Defence Instruments precisely relies on this character of unfair trade as a floating signifier.","PeriodicalId":186367,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives on European Politics and Society","volume":"93 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Battle Against Unfair Trade in the EU Trade Policy: A Discourse Analysis of Trade Protection\",\"authors\":\"J. Mathieu, Sharon Weinblum\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15705854.2013.785263\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The European Union considers Trade Defence Instruments (i.e., anti-dumping, countervailing duties and safeguards) as a cornerstone of the EU trade policy in the battle against ‘unfair competition from across the globe’. At the same time, the rationale behind these instruments, or the fight against ‘unfair trade practices’, remains somehow woolly. In this article, we argue that it is crucial to unpack the different meanings bestowed on the concept of unfair trade. An interpretative perspective is therefore adopted in order to highlight the complexity behind this notion. The analysis is based on a systematic analysis of the debates revolving around the issue of Trade Defence Instruments held within the European Parliament during the current legislative session. First, we show that a specific storyline on unfair trade can be considered dominant. Second, we expose the ‘kaleidoscopic’ reality behind unfair trade, showing that this notion is a floating signifier. Against this backcloth, the article puts forward the argument that the institutionalisation of Trade Defence Instruments precisely relies on this character of unfair trade as a floating signifier.\",\"PeriodicalId\":186367,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Perspectives on European Politics and Society\",\"volume\":\"93 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Perspectives on European Politics and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15705854.2013.785263\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives on European Politics and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15705854.2013.785263","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

欧盟将贸易防御工具(即反倾销、反补贴税和保障措施)视为欧盟贸易政策的基石,以对抗“来自全球的不公平竞争”。与此同时,这些工具背后的基本原理,或反对“不公平贸易行为”的斗争,在某种程度上仍然模糊不清。在本文中,我们认为,关键是要解开赋予不公平贸易概念的不同含义。因此,为了突出这一概念背后的复杂性,采用了解释性视角。该分析是基于对本届立法会议期间欧洲议会内部围绕贸易保护工具问题进行的辩论的系统分析。首先,我们展示了一个关于不公平贸易的特定故事情节可以被认为是主导的。其次,我们揭示了不公平贸易背后的“万花筒”现实,表明这一概念是一个浮动的能指。在此背景下,本文提出贸易保护工具的制度化正是依赖于不公平贸易这一浮动能指的特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Battle Against Unfair Trade in the EU Trade Policy: A Discourse Analysis of Trade Protection
The European Union considers Trade Defence Instruments (i.e., anti-dumping, countervailing duties and safeguards) as a cornerstone of the EU trade policy in the battle against ‘unfair competition from across the globe’. At the same time, the rationale behind these instruments, or the fight against ‘unfair trade practices’, remains somehow woolly. In this article, we argue that it is crucial to unpack the different meanings bestowed on the concept of unfair trade. An interpretative perspective is therefore adopted in order to highlight the complexity behind this notion. The analysis is based on a systematic analysis of the debates revolving around the issue of Trade Defence Instruments held within the European Parliament during the current legislative session. First, we show that a specific storyline on unfair trade can be considered dominant. Second, we expose the ‘kaleidoscopic’ reality behind unfair trade, showing that this notion is a floating signifier. Against this backcloth, the article puts forward the argument that the institutionalisation of Trade Defence Instruments precisely relies on this character of unfair trade as a floating signifier.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信