脑电图与近红外光谱有因果关系吗?

Borzou Alipourfard, Jean X. Gao, Olajide Babawale, Hanli Liu
{"title":"脑电图与近红外光谱有因果关系吗?","authors":"Borzou Alipourfard, Jean X. Gao, Olajide Babawale, Hanli Liu","doi":"10.1109/BIBM.2016.7822648","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Causality analysis of simultaneous measurements of the brain's electrical activity and its hemodynamic activity provides the opportunity to study the neural underpinning of hemodynamic fluctuations. This multimodal analysis can also be used to extract valuable information regarding the location of the generators of various electrical events such as Alpha rhythms or epileptiform activity. To best of our knowledge, we are the first propose a method to assess causality from EEG to the hemodynamic activity measured using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRs). The main challenge in studying causality within this setting arises from the low sampling rate of the fNIRs and the mixed frequency nature of the data. Our method of analysis consists of two parts. Through a simple modification of Geweke's formulation of contamination, we first show that the low sampling frequency of the fNIRs does not cause contamination in estimating causality from EEG to fNIRs. We then apply a novel causality test to avoid the down-sampling of the EEG when measuring for causality. The method of analysis proposed here can be generalized to study causality in other biomedical signal analysis applications and mixed frequency settings.","PeriodicalId":345384,"journal":{"name":"2016 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM)","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is EEG causal to fNIRs?\",\"authors\":\"Borzou Alipourfard, Jean X. Gao, Olajide Babawale, Hanli Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/BIBM.2016.7822648\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Causality analysis of simultaneous measurements of the brain's electrical activity and its hemodynamic activity provides the opportunity to study the neural underpinning of hemodynamic fluctuations. This multimodal analysis can also be used to extract valuable information regarding the location of the generators of various electrical events such as Alpha rhythms or epileptiform activity. To best of our knowledge, we are the first propose a method to assess causality from EEG to the hemodynamic activity measured using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRs). The main challenge in studying causality within this setting arises from the low sampling rate of the fNIRs and the mixed frequency nature of the data. Our method of analysis consists of two parts. Through a simple modification of Geweke's formulation of contamination, we first show that the low sampling frequency of the fNIRs does not cause contamination in estimating causality from EEG to fNIRs. We then apply a novel causality test to avoid the down-sampling of the EEG when measuring for causality. The method of analysis proposed here can be generalized to study causality in other biomedical signal analysis applications and mixed frequency settings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":345384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM)\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/BIBM.2016.7822648\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/BIBM.2016.7822648","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

同时测量脑电活动和血流动力学活动的因果关系分析为研究血流动力学波动的神经基础提供了机会。这种多模态分析也可用于提取有关各种电事件(如α节律或癫痫样活动)的发生器位置的有价值的信息。据我们所知,我们是第一个提出一种方法来评估从脑电图到使用功能近红外光谱(fNIRs)测量的血流动力学活性的因果关系。在这种情况下研究因果关系的主要挑战来自近红外光谱的低采样率和数据的混合频率性质。我们的分析方法由两部分组成。通过对Geweke的污染公式的简单修改,我们首先证明了低采样频率的近红外光谱在估计EEG到近红外光谱的因果关系时不会造成污染。然后,我们应用了一种新的因果关系检验,以避免在测量因果关系时脑电图的下采样。本文提出的分析方法可以推广到其他生物医学信号分析应用和混合频率设置中的因果关系研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Is EEG causal to fNIRs?
Causality analysis of simultaneous measurements of the brain's electrical activity and its hemodynamic activity provides the opportunity to study the neural underpinning of hemodynamic fluctuations. This multimodal analysis can also be used to extract valuable information regarding the location of the generators of various electrical events such as Alpha rhythms or epileptiform activity. To best of our knowledge, we are the first propose a method to assess causality from EEG to the hemodynamic activity measured using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRs). The main challenge in studying causality within this setting arises from the low sampling rate of the fNIRs and the mixed frequency nature of the data. Our method of analysis consists of two parts. Through a simple modification of Geweke's formulation of contamination, we first show that the low sampling frequency of the fNIRs does not cause contamination in estimating causality from EEG to fNIRs. We then apply a novel causality test to avoid the down-sampling of the EEG when measuring for causality. The method of analysis proposed here can be generalized to study causality in other biomedical signal analysis applications and mixed frequency settings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信