B.P.E诉Dangote Cement PLC (2020) 5 NWLR (Pt. 1717) 322:尼日利亚非法人集体协议的可执行性

V. Chukwuma
{"title":"B.P.E诉Dangote Cement PLC (2020) 5 NWLR (Pt. 1717) 322:尼日利亚非法人集体协议的可执行性","authors":"V. Chukwuma","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3785442","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper briefly reviews part of the recent decision of the Supreme Court in B.P.E v Dangote Cement Plc wherein the apex court reiterated the old common law position to wit that a collective agreement is not enforceable except where it has been incorporated into the contract of employment by the parties. The aim of this paper therefore is to discuss the applicability or otherwise of this recapitulation by the supreme court on the lower courts especially in the light of the doctrine of judicial precedent vis-à-vis the current labour dispensation in Nigeria. Adopting a doctrinal and analogical approach, the researcher finally submits that the supreme court’s decision particularly as it relates to collective agreements, is not binding on the lower courts and that, under the new labour dispensation, a collective agreement need not be incorporated into an employee’s contract of employment before it can be enforced by the court.","PeriodicalId":120850,"journal":{"name":"African Law eJournal","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"B.P.E v Dangote Cement PLC (2020) 5 NWLR (Pt. 1717) 322: The Enforceability of Unincorporated Collective Agreements in Nigeria\",\"authors\":\"V. Chukwuma\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3785442\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper briefly reviews part of the recent decision of the Supreme Court in B.P.E v Dangote Cement Plc wherein the apex court reiterated the old common law position to wit that a collective agreement is not enforceable except where it has been incorporated into the contract of employment by the parties. The aim of this paper therefore is to discuss the applicability or otherwise of this recapitulation by the supreme court on the lower courts especially in the light of the doctrine of judicial precedent vis-à-vis the current labour dispensation in Nigeria. Adopting a doctrinal and analogical approach, the researcher finally submits that the supreme court’s decision particularly as it relates to collective agreements, is not binding on the lower courts and that, under the new labour dispensation, a collective agreement need not be incorporated into an employee’s contract of employment before it can be enforced by the court.\",\"PeriodicalId\":120850,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"African Law eJournal\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"African Law eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3785442\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3785442","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文简要回顾了最近最高法院在B.P.E诉丹格特水泥有限公司一案中的部分判决,其中最高法院重申了旧的普通法立场,即集体协议除非已被当事人纳入雇佣合同,否则不得强制执行。因此,本文的目的是讨论最高法院对下级法院的这种重述的适用性或其他方面,特别是根据司法判例原则-à-vis尼日利亚目前的劳动分配。研究人员采用理论和类比的方法,最后提出,最高法院的决定,特别是涉及集体协议的决定,对下级法院没有约束力,根据新的劳动分配制度,集体协议无须纳入雇员的雇佣合同,法院才能强制执行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
B.P.E v Dangote Cement PLC (2020) 5 NWLR (Pt. 1717) 322: The Enforceability of Unincorporated Collective Agreements in Nigeria
This paper briefly reviews part of the recent decision of the Supreme Court in B.P.E v Dangote Cement Plc wherein the apex court reiterated the old common law position to wit that a collective agreement is not enforceable except where it has been incorporated into the contract of employment by the parties. The aim of this paper therefore is to discuss the applicability or otherwise of this recapitulation by the supreme court on the lower courts especially in the light of the doctrine of judicial precedent vis-à-vis the current labour dispensation in Nigeria. Adopting a doctrinal and analogical approach, the researcher finally submits that the supreme court’s decision particularly as it relates to collective agreements, is not binding on the lower courts and that, under the new labour dispensation, a collective agreement need not be incorporated into an employee’s contract of employment before it can be enforced by the court.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信