没有计算模糊的个人隐私:对开放信息网络隐私保护策略的再思考

D. Weitzner
{"title":"没有计算模糊的个人隐私:对开放信息网络隐私保护策略的再思考","authors":"D. Weitzner","doi":"10.1109/ACSAC.2007.50","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary form only given. Throughout the history of computer and network security research, privacy has been treated as synonymous with confidentiality, with the presumed high water mark of privacy being mathematically provable anonymity. Despite the fact that technical innovation in cryptography and network security has enabled all manner of confidentiality control over the exposure of identity in information systems, the vast majority of Internet user remain deeply worried about their privacy rights and correctly believe that they are far more exposed today than they might have been a generation earlier. Have we just failed to deploy the proper security technology to protect privacy, are our laws inadequate to meet present day privacy threats, or have business practices and social conventions simply rendered privacy dead? While there is some truth to each possibility, the central failure to achieve robust privacy in the information age can be traced to an a long-standing misassocation of privacy with confidentiality and access control. In order to revitalize privacy protection, we should shift our legal attention away from rules limiting disclosure of personal information toward policies governing how personal information can be used. And technical efforts currently focused on access control and anonymization should be redirected toward technical measures that make information usage more transparent and accountable to clearly stated policies that address proper and improper users of personal information.","PeriodicalId":199101,"journal":{"name":"Twenty-Third Annual Computer Security Applications Conference (ACSAC 2007)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Personal Privacy without Computational Obscurity: Rethinking Privacy Protection Strategies for Open Information Networks\",\"authors\":\"D. Weitzner\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ACSAC.2007.50\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Summary form only given. Throughout the history of computer and network security research, privacy has been treated as synonymous with confidentiality, with the presumed high water mark of privacy being mathematically provable anonymity. Despite the fact that technical innovation in cryptography and network security has enabled all manner of confidentiality control over the exposure of identity in information systems, the vast majority of Internet user remain deeply worried about their privacy rights and correctly believe that they are far more exposed today than they might have been a generation earlier. Have we just failed to deploy the proper security technology to protect privacy, are our laws inadequate to meet present day privacy threats, or have business practices and social conventions simply rendered privacy dead? While there is some truth to each possibility, the central failure to achieve robust privacy in the information age can be traced to an a long-standing misassocation of privacy with confidentiality and access control. In order to revitalize privacy protection, we should shift our legal attention away from rules limiting disclosure of personal information toward policies governing how personal information can be used. And technical efforts currently focused on access control and anonymization should be redirected toward technical measures that make information usage more transparent and accountable to clearly stated policies that address proper and improper users of personal information.\",\"PeriodicalId\":199101,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Twenty-Third Annual Computer Security Applications Conference (ACSAC 2007)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-12-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Twenty-Third Annual Computer Security Applications Conference (ACSAC 2007)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ACSAC.2007.50\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Twenty-Third Annual Computer Security Applications Conference (ACSAC 2007)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ACSAC.2007.50","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

只提供摘要形式。纵观计算机和网络安全研究的历史,隐私一直被视为机密性的同义词,隐私的高水位线是数学上可证明的匿名性。尽管事实上,密码学和网络安全方面的技术创新已经使信息系统中身份暴露的各种保密控制成为可能,但绝大多数互联网用户仍然对他们的隐私权深感担忧,并正确地认为,他们今天比上一代更容易暴露。是我们未能部署适当的安全技术来保护隐私,还是我们的法律不足以应对当今的隐私威胁,还是商业惯例和社会习俗只是使隐私死亡?虽然每种可能性都有一定的道理,但在信息时代实现健壮隐私的主要失败可以追溯到隐私与机密性和访问控制之间长期存在的错误关联。为了重振隐私保护,我们应该把我们的法律注意力从限制个人信息披露的规则转向管理个人信息如何使用的政策。目前集中在访问控制和匿名化上的技术努力应该转向技术措施,使信息的使用更加透明,并对明确规定的政策负责,以解决个人信息的适当和不适当的用户。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Personal Privacy without Computational Obscurity: Rethinking Privacy Protection Strategies for Open Information Networks
Summary form only given. Throughout the history of computer and network security research, privacy has been treated as synonymous with confidentiality, with the presumed high water mark of privacy being mathematically provable anonymity. Despite the fact that technical innovation in cryptography and network security has enabled all manner of confidentiality control over the exposure of identity in information systems, the vast majority of Internet user remain deeply worried about their privacy rights and correctly believe that they are far more exposed today than they might have been a generation earlier. Have we just failed to deploy the proper security technology to protect privacy, are our laws inadequate to meet present day privacy threats, or have business practices and social conventions simply rendered privacy dead? While there is some truth to each possibility, the central failure to achieve robust privacy in the information age can be traced to an a long-standing misassocation of privacy with confidentiality and access control. In order to revitalize privacy protection, we should shift our legal attention away from rules limiting disclosure of personal information toward policies governing how personal information can be used. And technical efforts currently focused on access control and anonymization should be redirected toward technical measures that make information usage more transparent and accountable to clearly stated policies that address proper and improper users of personal information.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信