自动驾驶汽车预测任务的横向加速度行为极限假设

Peter Zechel, Ralph Streiter, K. Bogenberger, U. Göhner
{"title":"自动驾驶汽车预测任务的横向加速度行为极限假设","authors":"Peter Zechel, Ralph Streiter, K. Bogenberger, U. Göhner","doi":"10.1109/ICOM47790.2019.8952059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents an analysis of the euroFot data set to determine limits for the typical lateral acceleration behavior of drivers. Since recent studies indicate that lateral accelerations close to the physically possible limit are rarely used by drivers, predictions tasks for autonomous driving could consider a smaller, so-called natural lateral acceleration interval (NLAI) instead of all physically possible lateral accelerations. This NLAI should be as small as possible while still fulfilling all safety aspects. Therefore, valid assumptions are required on which the interval can be derived. Since a valid assumption which leads to minimal NLAI is yet unknown, four different assumptions concerning the lateral acceleration behavior are derived and evaluated in this paper. Thereby, detailed examinations regarding the relative frequencies of violations are presented. Finally, two assumptions are recommended for introducing an NLAI, depending on prediction time and safety requirements. Additionally, the advantages of utilizing an NLAI instead of all physically possible lateral accelerations are highlighted by comparing the results of an occupancy prediction approach.","PeriodicalId":415914,"journal":{"name":"2019 7th International Conference on Mechatronics Engineering (ICOM)","volume":"101 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assumptions of Lateral Acceleration Behavior Limits for Prediction Tasks in Autonomous Vehicles\",\"authors\":\"Peter Zechel, Ralph Streiter, K. Bogenberger, U. Göhner\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICOM47790.2019.8952059\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper presents an analysis of the euroFot data set to determine limits for the typical lateral acceleration behavior of drivers. Since recent studies indicate that lateral accelerations close to the physically possible limit are rarely used by drivers, predictions tasks for autonomous driving could consider a smaller, so-called natural lateral acceleration interval (NLAI) instead of all physically possible lateral accelerations. This NLAI should be as small as possible while still fulfilling all safety aspects. Therefore, valid assumptions are required on which the interval can be derived. Since a valid assumption which leads to minimal NLAI is yet unknown, four different assumptions concerning the lateral acceleration behavior are derived and evaluated in this paper. Thereby, detailed examinations regarding the relative frequencies of violations are presented. Finally, two assumptions are recommended for introducing an NLAI, depending on prediction time and safety requirements. Additionally, the advantages of utilizing an NLAI instead of all physically possible lateral accelerations are highlighted by comparing the results of an occupancy prediction approach.\",\"PeriodicalId\":415914,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 7th International Conference on Mechatronics Engineering (ICOM)\",\"volume\":\"101 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 7th International Conference on Mechatronics Engineering (ICOM)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICOM47790.2019.8952059\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 7th International Conference on Mechatronics Engineering (ICOM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICOM47790.2019.8952059","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文提出了euroft数据集的分析,以确定驾驶员的典型横向加速行为的限制。由于最近的研究表明,驾驶员很少使用接近物理可能极限的横向加速度,因此自动驾驶的预测任务可以考虑较小的所谓自然横向加速度间隔(NLAI),而不是所有物理上可能的横向加速度。该NLAI应尽可能小,同时仍然满足所有安全方面。因此,需要有效的假设来推导区间。由于导致最小NLAI的有效假设尚不清楚,因此本文推导并评估了有关横向加速度行为的四种不同假设。因此,对违反事件的相对频率进行了详细的审查。最后,根据预测时间和安全要求,推荐引入NLAI的两个假设。此外,通过比较占用率预测方法的结果,突出了利用NLAI而不是所有物理上可能的横向加速度的优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assumptions of Lateral Acceleration Behavior Limits for Prediction Tasks in Autonomous Vehicles
This paper presents an analysis of the euroFot data set to determine limits for the typical lateral acceleration behavior of drivers. Since recent studies indicate that lateral accelerations close to the physically possible limit are rarely used by drivers, predictions tasks for autonomous driving could consider a smaller, so-called natural lateral acceleration interval (NLAI) instead of all physically possible lateral accelerations. This NLAI should be as small as possible while still fulfilling all safety aspects. Therefore, valid assumptions are required on which the interval can be derived. Since a valid assumption which leads to minimal NLAI is yet unknown, four different assumptions concerning the lateral acceleration behavior are derived and evaluated in this paper. Thereby, detailed examinations regarding the relative frequencies of violations are presented. Finally, two assumptions are recommended for introducing an NLAI, depending on prediction time and safety requirements. Additionally, the advantages of utilizing an NLAI instead of all physically possible lateral accelerations are highlighted by comparing the results of an occupancy prediction approach.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信