{"title":"在古斯拉夫学发展的当前阶段，接受P. Y. Shafarik关于格拉戈政治学的首要地位的观点","authors":"Julia YUSYP-YAKIMOVICH, Olena Olena SHIMKO","doi":"10.30970/sls.2021.70.3734","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. The problem of the origin of the Glagolitic alphabet, its origins and the first years of Slavic writing can rightly be called the “cursed question” (questio dia-bolica – B. Uspensky) of Slavic studies, as attempts to connect the Glagolitic alphabet with any of the existing alphabets did not lead to any convincing results. Until now, the only relevant ideas of P. Shafarik remain, expressed about 150 years ago. Purpose. The aim of the article is to systematize and analyze historical and modern ideas (from the 90s to the present day), which are expressed by researchers regarding the longer antiquity of the Glagolitic alphabet. Results. The authors consider the development of P. Shafarik’s ideas at the pre-sent stage of development of East Slavic paleolinguistics. Materials about the origins of Slavic writing, which have accumulated in science, do not facilitate the solution of ques-tions about: 1) which of the two Slavic alphabets was created and / or improved by Constantine the Philosopher, 2) how and when another Slavic alphabet appeared, and 3) how the Slavic script developed in the post -Constantine period. In this context, as the authors show, all the hypotheses and ideas of modern researchers in one way or another develop the arguments of the hypothesis of PY Shafarik and do not go beyond it. Keywords: Slavonic writing, Cyrillic, Glagolitic, P. Shafarik’s hypothesis. Cristiano, Diddi, 2015. In the footsteps of Glagolitic protographers of Pannonian leg-ends: Methodological notes on the critique of variants. ΠΟΛΥΙΣΤΩΡ. Scripta slavica Mar-io Capaldo dicata. Moskow, Indrik, рp. 80–98. (In Russian) Dodonov, I. Yu., 2008. The origins of Slavic writing. Moskow: Veche. Avialable at: http://www.libma.ru/istorija/istoki_slavjanskoi_pismennosti). [Accessed 22.08.2021] (In Russian) Glazunova, O. I. On the countable value of the Glagolitic alphabet. Avialable at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/o- schetnom-znachenii- glagolitsy). [Accessed 22.08.2021] (In Russian) Granstrom, E., 1985. On the origin of the Glagolitic alphabet. Proceedings of the De-partment of Ancient Russian Literature IRLI AN SSSR, 11. Leningrad, s.300–313. (In Russian) Hakobyan, Ruben, 2018. An Attempt to Reveal the Prototype of the Glagolitic Letters, Based on a Comparative Analysis with the Cyrillic Letters and the Signs of the Middle East. Scripts Scientific almanac, 12. Pskov: Pskov State University, рp. 30–58. (In Rus-sian) Horalek, K., 1971. The need for a new Glagolitic compendium. Slovo, 21, рp.359–363. (In Czech) Ivanova, T., 2004. Glagolitic: new hypotheses (several critical remarks about new re-search on the first Slavic alphabet. Proceedings of the Department of Old Russian Litera-ture (Pushkin House) RAS, pp.78–93. (In Russian) Karpenko, L., 1999. Glagolitic — Slavic sacred alphabet (semiotic analysis in the context of the Bible). Samara: PH of the Samara Humanitarian Academy. (In Russian) Karpenko, L., 2000. Glagolitic as a semiotic system: Doctoral thesis abstract, p.90. (In Russian) Karpenko, L., 2010. Cyril glagolitic alphabet. About the roots of the Slavic spirituali-ty. Bulletin of polessky state university. Series in social sciences and humanities, 1, рp.69–78. (In Russian) Kiparsky, B., 1968. On the origin of the Glagolitic alphabet. Clement Ohridsky. Mate-rial z negovot cheztvuvane po sluchai 1050 godini smerta mu. Sofia, 1968, рp.91–92. (In Russian) Kuznetsov, Anatoly, 2012. The Greek letter Y ψιλόν and Glagolitic Alphabet . Slavisti-ca Vilnensis. Kalbotyra, 57(2), рp.7–14. (In Russian). Mozhaeva, I. Ye., 1980. Bibliography on Cyril and Methodius problems 1945–1974. Moscow, 1980. (In Russian) Prokhorov, G., 1992. Glagolitic alphabet among missionary alphabets. Proceedings of the Department of Old Russian Literature, 45. SPb, рp.178–199. (In Russian) Rudelev, V. G., 2001. Once again on the Old Slavic letters. Bulletin of Tver State Uni-versity. Humanitarian sciences, 2 (22). рp.58–67. (In Russian) Savelyeva, L. V., 1993. Sacral meaning of the Slavic alphabet: Parting words of the First Teacher of the Slavs, 3. North Petrozavodsk, рp.152–158. (In Russian) Selishchev, A. M., 1951. Old Slavonic language: Part I. p.333. (In Russian) Selishchev, A. M., 2020. Old Church Slavonic. Ed. stereotype. URSS. (In Russian) Shafarik, P. Y., 1861. About the origin and homeland of Glagolism. Moscow. (In Rus-sian) Shchepkin, V. N., 1967. Russian paleography. Moscow: Science. (In Russian) Sobolev, A. N., 2021. Slavic alphabets. Part 3: From Glagolitic to Cyrillic. https://www.youtube.com/w Šafárik o staroslovienčine a cirkevnej slovančine. atch?v=y_Py_W9ZL7s&ab). [Accessed 22.08.2021] Starovoyt, Yu. L., 2017. Scientific approach to the origin of the Cyrillic alphabet. Ma-terialy XLVI naukovo-tekhnichnoyi konferentsiyi pidrozdiliv VNTU. Vinnytsya, 22–24 be-reznya 2017 r. Avialable at: https://conferences.vntu.edu.ua/index.php/all— hum/all— hum— 2017/paper/view/2328. [Accessed 22.08.2021 (In Ukrainian) Štec, M., 1996. Šafárik on Old Slavonic and Church Slavonic. In: Pavol Jozef Šafárik a slavistika. Zborník príspevkov z vedeckej konferencie a dokumentov z osláv 200. výročia narodenia P. J. Šafárika. Acta facultatis philosophicae universitatis šafarikianae Literárný zborník 12/ Jazykovedný zborník 13. Historický zborník 5 (AFPh UŠ 79). Filozofická fakulta. UPJŠ. Prešov. Matica slovenská. Martin, s.291–295.(In Slovak) Stepanov, Yu. S. and Proskurin, S.G., 1993. Constants of world culture. Alphabets and alphabetic texts during periods of dual faith. Moscow: The science. 158 p. (In Russian) Toporov, V., 1998. Prehistory of Literature among the Slavs: The Experience of Re-construction: An Introduction to the Course of the History of Slavic Literatures. Moscow. (In Russian) Tschernochvostoff, 1995. Zum Ursprung der Glagolica. Studia Slavica Finlandensia, 12, pp.141–150). (In German) Uspenskij, B., 2013. Glagolitic Script as a Manifestation of Sacred Knowledge. Studia Slavistici, X. Firenze University Press, pp.7–27 (online). [Accessed 22.08.2021 (In English) Uspensky, B., 2005. On the origin of the Glagolitic alphabet. Voprosy Jazykoznanija (Topics in the study of language), 1. рp.63–77. (In Russian) Vinke, Fr., 1996. On the origin and structure of the Glagolitic alphabet. Literary studies, 3. Moscow, рp.115–127. (In Russian) Yusyp-Yakymovich, Yu. and Shimko, O., 2009. Old Slavonic language. Modular course. Navchalnyi posibnyk. Kyiv. (In Ukrainian)","PeriodicalId":422873,"journal":{"name":"Problems of slavonic studies","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"To the reception P. Y. Shafarik’s ideas about the primacy of the glagolitics at the current stage of paleoslavistics development\",\"authors\":\"Julia YUSYP-YAKIMOVICH, Olena Olena SHIMKO\",\"doi\":\"10.30970/sls.2021.70.3734\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background. The problem of the origin of the Glagolitic alphabet, its origins and the first years of Slavic writing can rightly be called the “cursed question” (questio dia-bolica – B. Uspensky) of Slavic studies, as attempts to connect the Glagolitic alphabet with any of the existing alphabets did not lead to any convincing results. Until now, the only relevant ideas of P. Shafarik remain, expressed about 150 years ago. Purpose. The aim of the article is to systematize and analyze historical and modern ideas (from the 90s to the present day), which are expressed by researchers regarding the longer antiquity of the Glagolitic alphabet. Results. The authors consider the development of P. Shafarik’s ideas at the pre-sent stage of development of East Slavic paleolinguistics. Materials about the origins of Slavic writing, which have accumulated in science, do not facilitate the solution of ques-tions about: 1) which of the two Slavic alphabets was created and / or improved by Constantine the Philosopher, 2) how and when another Slavic alphabet appeared, and 3) how the Slavic script developed in the post -Constantine period. In this context, as the authors show, all the hypotheses and ideas of modern researchers in one way or another develop the arguments of the hypothesis of PY Shafarik and do not go beyond it. Keywords: Slavonic writing, Cyrillic, Glagolitic, P. Shafarik’s hypothesis. Cristiano, Diddi, 2015. In the footsteps of Glagolitic protographers of Pannonian leg-ends: Methodological notes on the critique of variants. ΠΟΛΥΙΣΤΩΡ. Scripta slavica Mar-io Capaldo dicata. Moskow, Indrik, рp. 80–98. (In Russian) Dodonov, I. Yu., 2008. The origins of Slavic writing. Moskow: Veche. Avialable at: http://www.libma.ru/istorija/istoki_slavjanskoi_pismennosti). [Accessed 22.08.2021] (In Russian) Glazunova, O. I. On the countable value of the Glagolitic alphabet. Avialable at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/o- schetnom-znachenii- glagolitsy). [Accessed 22.08.2021] (In Russian) Granstrom, E., 1985. On the origin of the Glagolitic alphabet. Proceedings of the De-partment of Ancient Russian Literature IRLI AN SSSR, 11. Leningrad, s.300–313. (In Russian) Hakobyan, Ruben, 2018. An Attempt to Reveal the Prototype of the Glagolitic Letters, Based on a Comparative Analysis with the Cyrillic Letters and the Signs of the Middle East. Scripts Scientific almanac, 12. Pskov: Pskov State University, рp. 30–58. (In Rus-sian) Horalek, K., 1971. The need for a new Glagolitic compendium. Slovo, 21, рp.359–363. (In Czech) Ivanova, T., 2004. Glagolitic: new hypotheses (several critical remarks about new re-search on the first Slavic alphabet. Proceedings of the Department of Old Russian Litera-ture (Pushkin House) RAS, pp.78–93. (In Russian) Karpenko, L., 1999. Glagolitic — Slavic sacred alphabet (semiotic analysis in the context of the Bible). Samara: PH of the Samara Humanitarian Academy. (In Russian) Karpenko, L., 2000. Glagolitic as a semiotic system: Doctoral thesis abstract, p.90. (In Russian) Karpenko, L., 2010. Cyril glagolitic alphabet. About the roots of the Slavic spirituali-ty. Bulletin of polessky state university. Series in social sciences and humanities, 1, рp.69–78. (In Russian) Kiparsky, B., 1968. On the origin of the Glagolitic alphabet. Clement Ohridsky. Mate-rial z negovot cheztvuvane po sluchai 1050 godini smerta mu. Sofia, 1968, рp.91–92. (In Russian) Kuznetsov, Anatoly, 2012. The Greek letter Y ψιλόν and Glagolitic Alphabet . Slavisti-ca Vilnensis. Kalbotyra, 57(2), рp.7–14. (In Russian). Mozhaeva, I. Ye., 1980. Bibliography on Cyril and Methodius problems 1945–1974. Moscow, 1980. (In Russian) Prokhorov, G., 1992. Glagolitic alphabet among missionary alphabets. Proceedings of the Department of Old Russian Literature, 45. SPb, рp.178–199. (In Russian) Rudelev, V. G., 2001. Once again on the Old Slavic letters. Bulletin of Tver State Uni-versity. Humanitarian sciences, 2 (22). рp.58–67. (In Russian) Savelyeva, L. V., 1993. Sacral meaning of the Slavic alphabet: Parting words of the First Teacher of the Slavs, 3. North Petrozavodsk, рp.152–158. (In Russian) Selishchev, A. M., 1951. Old Slavonic language: Part I. p.333. (In Russian) Selishchev, A. M., 2020. Old Church Slavonic. Ed. stereotype. URSS. (In Russian) Shafarik, P. Y., 1861. About the origin and homeland of Glagolism. Moscow. (In Rus-sian) Shchepkin, V. N., 1967. Russian paleography. Moscow: Science. (In Russian) Sobolev, A. N., 2021. Slavic alphabets. Part 3: From Glagolitic to Cyrillic. https://www.youtube.com/w Šafárik o staroslovienčine a cirkevnej slovančine. atch?v=y_Py_W9ZL7s&ab). [Accessed 22.08.2021] Starovoyt, Yu. L., 2017. Scientific approach to the origin of the Cyrillic alphabet. Ma-terialy XLVI naukovo-tekhnichnoyi konferentsiyi pidrozdiliv VNTU. Vinnytsya, 22–24 be-reznya 2017 r. Avialable at: https://conferences.vntu.edu.ua/index.php/all— hum/all— hum— 2017/paper/view/2328. [Accessed 22.08.2021 (In Ukrainian) Štec, M., 1996. Šafárik on Old Slavonic and Church Slavonic. In: Pavol Jozef Šafárik a slavistika. Zborník príspevkov z vedeckej konferencie a dokumentov z osláv 200. výročia narodenia P. J. Šafárika. Acta facultatis philosophicae universitatis šafarikianae Literárný zborník 12/ Jazykovedný zborník 13. Historický zborník 5 (AFPh UŠ 79). Filozofická fakulta. UPJŠ. Prešov. Matica slovenská. Martin, s.291–295.(In Slovak) Stepanov, Yu. S. and Proskurin, S.G., 1993. Constants of world culture. Alphabets and alphabetic texts during periods of dual faith. Moscow: The science. 158 p. (In Russian) Toporov, V., 1998. Prehistory of Literature among the Slavs: The Experience of Re-construction: An Introduction to the Course of the History of Slavic Literatures. Moscow. (In Russian) Tschernochvostoff, 1995. Zum Ursprung der Glagolica. Studia Slavica Finlandensia, 12, pp.141–150). (In German) Uspenskij, B., 2013. Glagolitic Script as a Manifestation of Sacred Knowledge. Studia Slavistici, X. Firenze University Press, pp.7–27 (online). [Accessed 22.08.2021 (In English) Uspensky, B., 2005. On the origin of the Glagolitic alphabet. Voprosy Jazykoznanija (Topics in the study of language), 1. рp.63–77. (In Russian) Vinke, Fr., 1996. On the origin and structure of the Glagolitic alphabet. Literary studies, 3. Moscow, рp.115–127. (In Russian) Yusyp-Yakymovich, Yu. and Shimko, O., 2009. Old Slavonic language. Modular course. Navchalnyi posibnyk. Kyiv. (In Ukrainian)\",\"PeriodicalId\":422873,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Problems of slavonic studies\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Problems of slavonic studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30970/sls.2021.70.3734\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Problems of slavonic studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30970/sls.2021.70.3734","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景。格拉哥利字母的起源问题，它的起源和斯拉夫文字的最初几年，可以被正确地称为斯拉夫研究的“诅咒问题”，因为试图将格拉哥利字母与任何现有的字母联系起来都没有导致任何令人信服的结果。直到现在，P. Shafarik唯一相关的思想仍然存在，大约在150年前表达。目的。这篇文章的目的是系统化和分析历史和现代的想法(从90年代到现在)，这些想法是由研究人员关于格拉哥利字母的更长的古代所表达的。结果。作者在东斯拉夫古语言学发展的现阶段考察了P. Shafarik思想的发展。科学中积累的关于斯拉夫文字起源的材料，并不能帮助解决以下问题:1)两种斯拉夫字母中的哪一种是由哲学家君士坦丁创造和/或改进的;2)另一种斯拉夫字母是如何以及何时出现的;3)斯拉夫文字在后君士坦丁时期是如何发展的。在这种背景下，正如作者所表明的那样，现代研究者的所有假设和思想都以这样或那样的方式发展了PY Shafarik假设的论点，而没有超越它。关键词:斯拉夫文字，西里尔文，格拉哥利文，P. Shafarik假说克里斯蒂亚诺，迪迪，2015年。在潘诺尼亚传说的格拉哥利亚原作者的足迹:对变体批判的方法论注释。ΠΟΛΥΙΣΤΩΡ。马尔乔·卡帕尔多·迪卡塔。莫斯科，Indrik, p。80 - 98。(俄文)多多诺夫，I.余。, 2008年。斯拉夫文字的起源。Moskow: Veche。可在:http://www.libma.ru/istorija/istoki_slavjanskoi_pismennosti)。[获取日期:2021年8月22日](俄语)Glazunova, O. I.论格拉哥利字母表的可数值。可在:https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/o- scheme -znachenii- glagolitsy)。[获取日期:22.08.2021](俄文)Granstrom, E.， 1985。格拉哥利字母的起源。《俄罗斯古代文学系学报》，2011年11月。列宁格勒,s.300 - 313。(俄文)哈科比安，鲁本，2018年。从西里尔字母和中东符号的比较分析看格拉哥利亚文字的原型。科学年鉴，12。普斯科夫:普斯科夫国立大学。30-58。霍拉莱克，K.， 1971。需要一个新的格拉哥利斯纲要。Slovo, 21, 35: 359 - 363。(捷克语)伊万诺娃，T.， 2004。格拉哥利语:新假说(对第一斯拉夫字母新研究的若干批评评论)。《旧俄罗斯文学系论文集》(普希金出版社)，第78 - 93页。卡尔潘科，L.， 1999。格拉哥利文-斯拉夫神圣字母(圣经语境中的符号学分析)。萨马拉:萨马拉人道主义学院博士。卡尔潘科，L.， 2000。作为符号系统的格拉哥利体:博士论文摘要，第90页。(俄文)卡尔潘科，路易斯安那州，2010。西里尔字母。关于斯拉夫精神的根源。波兰国立大学学报。社会科学与人文科学丛刊，2011(1):69 - 78。(俄文)基帕斯基，1968年。格拉哥利字母的起源。克莱门特Ohridsky。材料z - negovot cheztvuvane po sluchai 1050 godini merta mu。索菲亚，1968,p.91 - 92。(俄文)库兹涅佐夫，阿纳托利，2012。希腊字母Y ψιλόν和格拉哥利字母表。Slavisti-ca Vilnensis。Kalbotyra, 57(2)， 7 - 14。(俄罗斯)。莫札耶娃，我。, 1980年。西里尔和梅托迪乌斯问题参考书目(1945-1974)。莫斯科,1980年。(俄文)普罗霍罗夫，G.， 1992。传教字母中的格拉哥利字母。《旧俄罗斯文学系论文集》，45年。SPb,рp.178 - 199。(俄文)鲁捷列夫，v.g.， 2001。再来看看古斯拉夫字母。特维尔州立大学学报。人道主义科学，2(22)。рp.58 - 67。(俄文)萨维利耶娃，l.v.， 1993。斯拉夫字母的神圣意义:斯拉夫人的第一位老师的临别话，3。北彼得罗扎沃茨克，<s:2> .152 - 158。(俄文)塞利什切夫，1951。古斯拉夫语:第i部分，第333页。Selishchev, A. M.， 2020。古教堂斯拉夫语。患儿的刻板印象。用户需求说明书。(俄文)沙法里克，p.y.， 1861。关于格拉戈派的起源和故乡。莫斯科。(俄文)Shchepkin, V. N. 1967。俄罗斯的古文书。莫斯科:科学。(俄文)Sobolev, a.n.， 2021。斯拉夫字母。第三部分:从格拉哥利文到西里尔文。https://www.youtube.com/w Šafárik o staroslovien<e:1> ine a cirkevnej slovan<e:1>。青岛? v = y_Py_W9ZL7s&ab)。[访问日期:22.08.2021]Starovoyt, Yu。L。2017。西里尔字母起源的科学方法。[材料][材料][材料][材料][材料][材料][材料][材料][材料][材料]Vinnytsya, 22-24 be-reznya 2017 r.可在:https://conferences.vntu.edu.ua/index.php/all - hum/all - hum - 2017/paper/view/2328。[获取日期:2021年8月22日(乌克兰文)Štec, M.， 1996。
To the reception P. Y. Shafarik’s ideas about the primacy of the glagolitics at the current stage of paleoslavistics development
Background. The problem of the origin of the Glagolitic alphabet, its origins and the first years of Slavic writing can rightly be called the “cursed question” (questio dia-bolica – B. Uspensky) of Slavic studies, as attempts to connect the Glagolitic alphabet with any of the existing alphabets did not lead to any convincing results. Until now, the only relevant ideas of P. Shafarik remain, expressed about 150 years ago. Purpose. The aim of the article is to systematize and analyze historical and modern ideas (from the 90s to the present day), which are expressed by researchers regarding the longer antiquity of the Glagolitic alphabet. Results. The authors consider the development of P. Shafarik’s ideas at the pre-sent stage of development of East Slavic paleolinguistics. Materials about the origins of Slavic writing, which have accumulated in science, do not facilitate the solution of ques-tions about: 1) which of the two Slavic alphabets was created and / or improved by Constantine the Philosopher, 2) how and when another Slavic alphabet appeared, and 3) how the Slavic script developed in the post -Constantine period. In this context, as the authors show, all the hypotheses and ideas of modern researchers in one way or another develop the arguments of the hypothesis of PY Shafarik and do not go beyond it. Keywords: Slavonic writing, Cyrillic, Glagolitic, P. Shafarik’s hypothesis. Cristiano, Diddi, 2015. In the footsteps of Glagolitic protographers of Pannonian leg-ends: Methodological notes on the critique of variants. ΠΟΛΥΙΣΤΩΡ. Scripta slavica Mar-io Capaldo dicata. Moskow, Indrik, рp. 80–98. (In Russian) Dodonov, I. Yu., 2008. The origins of Slavic writing. Moskow: Veche. Avialable at: http://www.libma.ru/istorija/istoki_slavjanskoi_pismennosti). [Accessed 22.08.2021] (In Russian) Glazunova, O. I. On the countable value of the Glagolitic alphabet. Avialable at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/o- schetnom-znachenii- glagolitsy). [Accessed 22.08.2021] (In Russian) Granstrom, E., 1985. On the origin of the Glagolitic alphabet. Proceedings of the De-partment of Ancient Russian Literature IRLI AN SSSR, 11. Leningrad, s.300–313. (In Russian) Hakobyan, Ruben, 2018. An Attempt to Reveal the Prototype of the Glagolitic Letters, Based on a Comparative Analysis with the Cyrillic Letters and the Signs of the Middle East. Scripts Scientific almanac, 12. Pskov: Pskov State University, рp. 30–58. (In Rus-sian) Horalek, K., 1971. The need for a new Glagolitic compendium. Slovo, 21, рp.359–363. (In Czech) Ivanova, T., 2004. Glagolitic: new hypotheses (several critical remarks about new re-search on the first Slavic alphabet. Proceedings of the Department of Old Russian Litera-ture (Pushkin House) RAS, pp.78–93. (In Russian) Karpenko, L., 1999. Glagolitic — Slavic sacred alphabet (semiotic analysis in the context of the Bible). Samara: PH of the Samara Humanitarian Academy. (In Russian) Karpenko, L., 2000. Glagolitic as a semiotic system: Doctoral thesis abstract, p.90. (In Russian) Karpenko, L., 2010. Cyril glagolitic alphabet. About the roots of the Slavic spirituali-ty. Bulletin of polessky state university. Series in social sciences and humanities, 1, рp.69–78. (In Russian) Kiparsky, B., 1968. On the origin of the Glagolitic alphabet. Clement Ohridsky. Mate-rial z negovot cheztvuvane po sluchai 1050 godini smerta mu. Sofia, 1968, рp.91–92. (In Russian) Kuznetsov, Anatoly, 2012. The Greek letter Y ψιλόν and Glagolitic Alphabet . Slavisti-ca Vilnensis. Kalbotyra, 57(2), рp.7–14. (In Russian). Mozhaeva, I. Ye., 1980. Bibliography on Cyril and Methodius problems 1945–1974. Moscow, 1980. (In Russian) Prokhorov, G., 1992. Glagolitic alphabet among missionary alphabets. Proceedings of the Department of Old Russian Literature, 45. SPb, рp.178–199. (In Russian) Rudelev, V. G., 2001. Once again on the Old Slavic letters. Bulletin of Tver State Uni-versity. Humanitarian sciences, 2 (22). рp.58–67. (In Russian) Savelyeva, L. V., 1993. Sacral meaning of the Slavic alphabet: Parting words of the First Teacher of the Slavs, 3. North Petrozavodsk, рp.152–158. (In Russian) Selishchev, A. M., 1951. Old Slavonic language: Part I. p.333. (In Russian) Selishchev, A. M., 2020. Old Church Slavonic. Ed. stereotype. URSS. (In Russian) Shafarik, P. Y., 1861. About the origin and homeland of Glagolism. Moscow. (In Rus-sian) Shchepkin, V. N., 1967. Russian paleography. Moscow: Science. (In Russian) Sobolev, A. N., 2021. Slavic alphabets. Part 3: From Glagolitic to Cyrillic. https://www.youtube.com/w Šafárik o staroslovienčine a cirkevnej slovančine. atch?v=y_Py_W9ZL7s&ab). [Accessed 22.08.2021] Starovoyt, Yu. L., 2017. Scientific approach to the origin of the Cyrillic alphabet. Ma-terialy XLVI naukovo-tekhnichnoyi konferentsiyi pidrozdiliv VNTU. Vinnytsya, 22–24 be-reznya 2017 r. Avialable at: https://conferences.vntu.edu.ua/index.php/all— hum/all— hum— 2017/paper/view/2328. [Accessed 22.08.2021 (In Ukrainian) Štec, M., 1996. Šafárik on Old Slavonic and Church Slavonic. In: Pavol Jozef Šafárik a slavistika. Zborník príspevkov z vedeckej konferencie a dokumentov z osláv 200. výročia narodenia P. J. Šafárika. Acta facultatis philosophicae universitatis šafarikianae Literárný zborník 12/ Jazykovedný zborník 13. Historický zborník 5 (AFPh UŠ 79). Filozofická fakulta. UPJŠ. Prešov. Matica slovenská. Martin, s.291–295.(In Slovak) Stepanov, Yu. S. and Proskurin, S.G., 1993. Constants of world culture. Alphabets and alphabetic texts during periods of dual faith. Moscow: The science. 158 p. (In Russian) Toporov, V., 1998. Prehistory of Literature among the Slavs: The Experience of Re-construction: An Introduction to the Course of the History of Slavic Literatures. Moscow. (In Russian) Tschernochvostoff, 1995. Zum Ursprung der Glagolica. Studia Slavica Finlandensia, 12, pp.141–150). (In German) Uspenskij, B., 2013. Glagolitic Script as a Manifestation of Sacred Knowledge. Studia Slavistici, X. Firenze University Press, pp.7–27 (online). [Accessed 22.08.2021 (In English) Uspensky, B., 2005. On the origin of the Glagolitic alphabet. Voprosy Jazykoznanija (Topics in the study of language), 1. рp.63–77. (In Russian) Vinke, Fr., 1996. On the origin and structure of the Glagolitic alphabet. Literary studies, 3. Moscow, рp.115–127. (In Russian) Yusyp-Yakymovich, Yu. and Shimko, O., 2009. Old Slavonic language. Modular course. Navchalnyi posibnyk. Kyiv. (In Ukrainian)
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
