医疗后送阶段枪炮性肢体骨折的顺序外植骨

Aleksandr A. Artemev, A. A. Kerimov, Sergej N. Perehodov, Maksim A. Grigoriev, Maksim N. Nelin, S. V. Torshina
{"title":"医疗后送阶段枪炮性肢体骨折的顺序外植骨","authors":"Aleksandr A. Artemev, A. A. Kerimov, Sergej N. Perehodov, Maksim A. Grigoriev, Maksim N. Nelin, S. V. Torshina","doi":"10.53652/2782-1730-2023-4-1-22-31","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Staged treatment of the patients with gunshot fractures of long bones implies a differentiated approach to the choice of different methods and means of extremity immobilization taking into account their peculiarities and functional capabilities. The frequency of different types of osteosynthesis in specialized care of 212 wounded patients with 276 gunshot fractures of long bones who were immobilized with external fixation devices (EFD) at the stage of advanced care was analyzed. It was revealed that when performing sequential osteosynthesis, preference for internal constructions was given — 122 (44.2%) observations. External osteosynthesis with Ilizarov apparatus (IA) was second most frequently used — 87 (31.5%). EFD was used as the definitive method of treatment in 67 (24.3%) cases. We studied and compared the constructive and functional capabilities of EFD and IA. The main advantage of the Ilizarov apparatus is the ability to control the position of the fragments and influence the process of regeneration by creating compression and distraction forces. The advantage of the EFD is the simplicity of use and, accordingly, the possibility of rapid fixation of the limb in resource-poor conditions with the simultaneous admission of a considerable number of wounded patients. Application of IA implies complex reconstructive interventions with prolonged subsequent treatment and rehabilitation. It should be taken into account when organizing staged treatment and use the type of osteosynthesis that corresponds to a particular stage. When providing qualified care, the use of EFD is absolutely indicated; when performing complex reconstructive operations of specialized trauma care, it is advisable to use the capabilities of the Ilizarov method.","PeriodicalId":344630,"journal":{"name":"Medical Bulletin of the Main Military Clinical Hospital named after N.N. Burdenko","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sequential external osteosynthesis of gunshot fractures of limb bones at the stages of medical evacuation\",\"authors\":\"Aleksandr A. Artemev, A. A. Kerimov, Sergej N. Perehodov, Maksim A. Grigoriev, Maksim N. Nelin, S. V. Torshina\",\"doi\":\"10.53652/2782-1730-2023-4-1-22-31\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Staged treatment of the patients with gunshot fractures of long bones implies a differentiated approach to the choice of different methods and means of extremity immobilization taking into account their peculiarities and functional capabilities. The frequency of different types of osteosynthesis in specialized care of 212 wounded patients with 276 gunshot fractures of long bones who were immobilized with external fixation devices (EFD) at the stage of advanced care was analyzed. It was revealed that when performing sequential osteosynthesis, preference for internal constructions was given — 122 (44.2%) observations. External osteosynthesis with Ilizarov apparatus (IA) was second most frequently used — 87 (31.5%). EFD was used as the definitive method of treatment in 67 (24.3%) cases. We studied and compared the constructive and functional capabilities of EFD and IA. The main advantage of the Ilizarov apparatus is the ability to control the position of the fragments and influence the process of regeneration by creating compression and distraction forces. The advantage of the EFD is the simplicity of use and, accordingly, the possibility of rapid fixation of the limb in resource-poor conditions with the simultaneous admission of a considerable number of wounded patients. Application of IA implies complex reconstructive interventions with prolonged subsequent treatment and rehabilitation. It should be taken into account when organizing staged treatment and use the type of osteosynthesis that corresponds to a particular stage. When providing qualified care, the use of EFD is absolutely indicated; when performing complex reconstructive operations of specialized trauma care, it is advisable to use the capabilities of the Ilizarov method.\",\"PeriodicalId\":344630,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Bulletin of the Main Military Clinical Hospital named after N.N. Burdenko\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Bulletin of the Main Military Clinical Hospital named after N.N. Burdenko\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.53652/2782-1730-2023-4-1-22-31\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Bulletin of the Main Military Clinical Hospital named after N.N. Burdenko","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53652/2782-1730-2023-4-1-22-31","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对长骨枪击骨折患者进行分期治疗,需要根据患者的特点和功能选择不同的固定方法和手段。分析了212例276例长骨枪弹骨折患者在晚期护理阶段采用外固定装置(EFD)固定的专科护理中不同类型的植骨频率。结果显示,在进行顺序骨固定时,有122(44.2%)的观察结果显示,优先选择内部结构。使用Ilizarov体外植骨器(IA)的次之,为87例(31.5%)。67例(24.3%)采用EFD作为最终治疗方法。我们研究并比较了EFD和IA的构建能力和功能。Ilizarov装置的主要优点是能够控制碎片的位置,并通过产生压缩和分散力来影响再生过程。EFD的优点是使用简单,因此,在资源贫乏的情况下,在同时收治大量受伤患者的情况下,可以快速固定肢体。IA的应用意味着复杂的重建干预和长期的后续治疗和康复。在组织分阶段治疗时应考虑到这一点,并使用与特定阶段相对应的骨固定类型。在提供合格的护理时,绝对需要使用EFD;在进行复杂的创伤专科重建手术时,建议使用Ilizarov方法的功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sequential external osteosynthesis of gunshot fractures of limb bones at the stages of medical evacuation
Staged treatment of the patients with gunshot fractures of long bones implies a differentiated approach to the choice of different methods and means of extremity immobilization taking into account their peculiarities and functional capabilities. The frequency of different types of osteosynthesis in specialized care of 212 wounded patients with 276 gunshot fractures of long bones who were immobilized with external fixation devices (EFD) at the stage of advanced care was analyzed. It was revealed that when performing sequential osteosynthesis, preference for internal constructions was given — 122 (44.2%) observations. External osteosynthesis with Ilizarov apparatus (IA) was second most frequently used — 87 (31.5%). EFD was used as the definitive method of treatment in 67 (24.3%) cases. We studied and compared the constructive and functional capabilities of EFD and IA. The main advantage of the Ilizarov apparatus is the ability to control the position of the fragments and influence the process of regeneration by creating compression and distraction forces. The advantage of the EFD is the simplicity of use and, accordingly, the possibility of rapid fixation of the limb in resource-poor conditions with the simultaneous admission of a considerable number of wounded patients. Application of IA implies complex reconstructive interventions with prolonged subsequent treatment and rehabilitation. It should be taken into account when organizing staged treatment and use the type of osteosynthesis that corresponds to a particular stage. When providing qualified care, the use of EFD is absolutely indicated; when performing complex reconstructive operations of specialized trauma care, it is advisable to use the capabilities of the Ilizarov method.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信