通过排放定价促进低碳技术的推广

Zakeri Ahmad
{"title":"通过排放定价促进低碳技术的推广","authors":"Zakeri Ahmad","doi":"10.1163/9789004446090_006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This is the first of the two chapters that take the discussions to the level of domestic trade policy measures for lowcarbon technology (lct) diffusion. Following the outlines of the proposed trade cooperation narrative laid out in the previous chapter, the goal here is twofold. One is to take the application of the narrative a step further by looking into a particular facilitative trade policy action in the backdrop of the existing framework of rules. Such an exercise would contribute by highlighting the bottlenecks where climate mitigation motivated measures may come to conflict with trade rules. The other goal is to identify the ways the proposed doctrine of Common Concern can ease or tackle those challenges. In substantive terms, the present chapter would call for pricing of ghg emissions domestically and also for imposing similar regulation upon imports (i.e. border adjustment). It would also propose that additional revenue gained from carbon pricing of imports be reverted to the production sources, the developing countries in particular, as technology upgradation support. The driving hypothesis here is that through the pricing of ghg emissions, it is possible to create a business environment that renders lowemission production and processing lucrative. To establish that hypothesis, the first section supplies a factual background to carbon pricing, as well as describes the key components of the proposed pricing approach. Thereafter, the second and the third section discuss the thorny issues with respect to wto rules in this regard. The following section introduces a counterfactual position, proposing a harmonisation endeavour under the rubric of Common Concern of Humankind. The concluding part sums up the analysis and the key findings therefrom.","PeriodicalId":154957,"journal":{"name":"WTO Law and Trade Policy Reform for Low-Carbon Technology Diffusion","volume":"38 4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assisting the Diffusion of Low-Carbon Technology through Emission Pricing\",\"authors\":\"Zakeri Ahmad\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/9789004446090_006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This is the first of the two chapters that take the discussions to the level of domestic trade policy measures for lowcarbon technology (lct) diffusion. Following the outlines of the proposed trade cooperation narrative laid out in the previous chapter, the goal here is twofold. One is to take the application of the narrative a step further by looking into a particular facilitative trade policy action in the backdrop of the existing framework of rules. Such an exercise would contribute by highlighting the bottlenecks where climate mitigation motivated measures may come to conflict with trade rules. The other goal is to identify the ways the proposed doctrine of Common Concern can ease or tackle those challenges. In substantive terms, the present chapter would call for pricing of ghg emissions domestically and also for imposing similar regulation upon imports (i.e. border adjustment). It would also propose that additional revenue gained from carbon pricing of imports be reverted to the production sources, the developing countries in particular, as technology upgradation support. The driving hypothesis here is that through the pricing of ghg emissions, it is possible to create a business environment that renders lowemission production and processing lucrative. To establish that hypothesis, the first section supplies a factual background to carbon pricing, as well as describes the key components of the proposed pricing approach. Thereafter, the second and the third section discuss the thorny issues with respect to wto rules in this regard. The following section introduces a counterfactual position, proposing a harmonisation endeavour under the rubric of Common Concern of Humankind. The concluding part sums up the analysis and the key findings therefrom.\",\"PeriodicalId\":154957,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"WTO Law and Trade Policy Reform for Low-Carbon Technology Diffusion\",\"volume\":\"38 4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"WTO Law and Trade Policy Reform for Low-Carbon Technology Diffusion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004446090_006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"WTO Law and Trade Policy Reform for Low-Carbon Technology Diffusion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004446090_006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这是讨论低碳技术(lct)扩散的国内贸易政策措施的两章中的第一章。根据前一章提出的贸易合作的概述,这里的目标是双重的。一是在现有规则框架的背景下,进一步研究一项特定的便利化贸易政策行动,从而进一步应用这一叙述。这种做法有助于突出以减缓气候变化为动机的措施可能与贸易规则发生冲突的瓶颈。另一个目标是确定拟议的共同关注原则可以缓解或解决这些挑战的方式。就实质性而言,本章将要求对国内的温室气体排放定价,并对进口实行类似的管制(即边界调整)。它还将建议将从进口碳定价中获得的额外收入作为技术升级支助返还给生产来源,特别是发展中国家。这里的驱动假设是,通过为温室气体排放定价,有可能创造一种商业环境,使低排放的生产和加工有利可图。为了建立这一假设,第一部分提供了碳定价的事实背景,并描述了拟议定价方法的关键组成部分。之后,第二和第三部分讨论了这方面世贸组织规则的棘手问题。下一节介绍了一个反事实的立场,提出了在人类共同关注的标题下的协调努力。结语部分对分析进行总结,得出主要结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assisting the Diffusion of Low-Carbon Technology through Emission Pricing
This is the first of the two chapters that take the discussions to the level of domestic trade policy measures for lowcarbon technology (lct) diffusion. Following the outlines of the proposed trade cooperation narrative laid out in the previous chapter, the goal here is twofold. One is to take the application of the narrative a step further by looking into a particular facilitative trade policy action in the backdrop of the existing framework of rules. Such an exercise would contribute by highlighting the bottlenecks where climate mitigation motivated measures may come to conflict with trade rules. The other goal is to identify the ways the proposed doctrine of Common Concern can ease or tackle those challenges. In substantive terms, the present chapter would call for pricing of ghg emissions domestically and also for imposing similar regulation upon imports (i.e. border adjustment). It would also propose that additional revenue gained from carbon pricing of imports be reverted to the production sources, the developing countries in particular, as technology upgradation support. The driving hypothesis here is that through the pricing of ghg emissions, it is possible to create a business environment that renders lowemission production and processing lucrative. To establish that hypothesis, the first section supplies a factual background to carbon pricing, as well as describes the key components of the proposed pricing approach. Thereafter, the second and the third section discuss the thorny issues with respect to wto rules in this regard. The following section introduces a counterfactual position, proposing a harmonisation endeavour under the rubric of Common Concern of Humankind. The concluding part sums up the analysis and the key findings therefrom.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信