腐败与竞选资金:一个伯克的视角

Jonathan Mendilow
{"title":"腐败与竞选资金:一个伯克的视角","authors":"Jonathan Mendilow","doi":"10.2478/scs-2014-0168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Edmond Burke based his 1780 plea for economic reform on a notion of political corruption that he touched on only in few additional letters and addresses of the time. It was soon eclipsed by other “burning” questions that occupied his mind, and remains among his less developed and less studied ideas. It nevertheless merits attention. As a pragmatic politician with a philosophical bent, his main aim in the speech on reform was to sway the politics of his time; yet his deductive reasoning led him to generalizations that may point to a possible direction by which we can look for solutions to some of the problems that beset current understandings of corruption. Of special interest in this context is his treatment of situations where widespread perception of corruption exists without any massive lawbreaking. In what follows I will argue that Burke’s conception stakes a midway position between the older, “classic” views of corruption, and the thought of the 18th century liberals that informs our current perceptions of the phenomenon. Both received ample attention in the literature. Nevertheless, a brief note may serve as context for the consideration of Burke’s ideas on the subject.","PeriodicalId":402426,"journal":{"name":"Studies of Changing Societies","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Corruption and Campaign Funding: A Burkean Perspective\",\"authors\":\"Jonathan Mendilow\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/scs-2014-0168\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Edmond Burke based his 1780 plea for economic reform on a notion of political corruption that he touched on only in few additional letters and addresses of the time. It was soon eclipsed by other “burning” questions that occupied his mind, and remains among his less developed and less studied ideas. It nevertheless merits attention. As a pragmatic politician with a philosophical bent, his main aim in the speech on reform was to sway the politics of his time; yet his deductive reasoning led him to generalizations that may point to a possible direction by which we can look for solutions to some of the problems that beset current understandings of corruption. Of special interest in this context is his treatment of situations where widespread perception of corruption exists without any massive lawbreaking. In what follows I will argue that Burke’s conception stakes a midway position between the older, “classic” views of corruption, and the thought of the 18th century liberals that informs our current perceptions of the phenomenon. Both received ample attention in the literature. Nevertheless, a brief note may serve as context for the consideration of Burke’s ideas on the subject.\",\"PeriodicalId\":402426,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studies of Changing Societies\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-11-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studies of Changing Societies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/scs-2014-0168\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies of Changing Societies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/scs-2014-0168","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

埃德蒙·伯克在1780年的经济改革呼吁中,提出了一个政治腐败的概念,他只在当时的几封信和演讲中提到过这个概念。这个问题很快就被他脑子里的其他“急迫”问题所掩盖,留在他的思想中,没有得到充分发展和研究。尽管如此,它还是值得关注。作为一位具有哲学倾向的务实政治家,他在改革演讲中的主要目的是动摇他那个时代的政治;然而,他的演绎推理使他得出了一些概括性的结论,这些结论可能为我们指明了一个可能的方向,通过这个方向,我们可以寻找一些困扰当前对腐败理解的问题的解决方案。在此背景下,特别有趣的是他对腐败普遍存在但没有大规模违法行为的情况的处理。在接下来的文章中,我将论证,伯克的概念介于旧的、“经典”的腐败观和18世纪自由主义者的思想之间,后者影响了我们对这一现象的当前看法。两者在文献中都得到了充分的关注。然而,一个简短的说明可以作为考虑伯克在这个问题上的想法的背景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Corruption and Campaign Funding: A Burkean Perspective
Edmond Burke based his 1780 plea for economic reform on a notion of political corruption that he touched on only in few additional letters and addresses of the time. It was soon eclipsed by other “burning” questions that occupied his mind, and remains among his less developed and less studied ideas. It nevertheless merits attention. As a pragmatic politician with a philosophical bent, his main aim in the speech on reform was to sway the politics of his time; yet his deductive reasoning led him to generalizations that may point to a possible direction by which we can look for solutions to some of the problems that beset current understandings of corruption. Of special interest in this context is his treatment of situations where widespread perception of corruption exists without any massive lawbreaking. In what follows I will argue that Burke’s conception stakes a midway position between the older, “classic” views of corruption, and the thought of the 18th century liberals that informs our current perceptions of the phenomenon. Both received ample attention in the literature. Nevertheless, a brief note may serve as context for the consideration of Burke’s ideas on the subject.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信