{"title":"Aiguebelette-le-Lac (Savoie) Beau Phare的最后新石器时代栖息地:阿尔卑斯弧线沿海村庄平面测量的新方法","authors":"R. Brigand, Y. Billaud","doi":"10.3406/bspf.2019.15052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"EnglishThe site of Aiguebelette-le-Lac / Beau-Phare is one of two final Neolithic settlement sites on Lake Aiguebelette. It is located in the southern part of the lake, on an extension of the shore platform, which forms a small peninsula to the north of Lepin Castel. Situated in shallow water (between 0.5 and 2 m in depth), the site was first identified in 1863 and was a focus for artefact collecting until the beginning of the 20th century. Following the inclusion of the site on the Unesco list of World Heritage Sites in 2011, Y. Billaud undertook the direction of a monitoring project, which included a condition assessment and bibliographic survey of the site conducted in 2016. A review of data produced by R. Laurent (1971) and A. Marguet (1983 and 1998), coupled with a short fieldwork campaign, significantly advanced our knowledge of the site. The extent of the site was established and an entrance path, which traversed three palisades, was identified and mapped. An area of 100 m² at the centre of the site was surveyed, bringing the total area recorded to 230 m². As part of the continuing exploration of the site, an underwater survey was carried out in 2018. The aim of this campaign was to plot the surviving timber piles in order to obtain an overview of the layout of the village. Prior to the recording of the piles, a 3600 m² grid was laid out. Depending on the area of the site and the density of piles, each 10x10 m square was subdivided into four intermediate units, each measuring 25 m². Some 1401 piles were plotted within an area 2600 m², which brings the number of recorded piles to 1670 out of a total of about 3000 for the entire site. The survey report throws considerable new light on the layout of the site. The gently curving access trackway crosses the village and extends as far as the northern extremity of the peninsula. It is formed by two parallel rows of piles, positioned some 1.6 to 2 m apart. The line of the path has been traced over a distance of about 90 m. Located to the east of the central axis of the peninsula, the trackway slopes gently upwards (0.7%) as far as the inner palisade before rising more steeply at the entrance to the village. It is formed of almost 290 piles, which are predominantly small in diameter and protrude only slightly above the sediments. The most evident entrance to the village is located on the axis of this trackway. It is formed of two rows of contiguous piles, which form a narrow bottleneck measuring less than 1 m in width. Some dendrochronological dates suggest it was built with trees felled in -2672. At least three palisades have been identified, representing several phases of building and re-building. The outer palisade forms the first enclosing element, which would have been encountered by approaching the site from the south. On the western side of the trackway, a single line of posts can be observed while to the east three roughly parallel lines are visible. The middle palisade features a marked dissymmetry between the sections to the east and west of the trackway. On the western side, it is composed of 24 piles spread out over a length of about 25 m. To the east of the trackway, its morphology is similar over a length of about 7 m: it is composed of densely spaced piles, which are medium size and very eroded. The line of the inner palisade is difficult to discern apart from an initial section at the east and a second section corresponding to the topographical ???centre??? the 1998 survey. Four piles belong to trees felled in -2684. The two segments of this palisade are typologically similar to the middle palisade: they are composed of piles of various dimensions, but always quite small, which are positioned very close together (less than about 0,5 m apart). The easternmost section is interesting because it does not form a straight line but instead but appears to form a dog-leg to the south-west where we observe five aligned piles. At this point, the gap in the palisade resembles an entrance and is precisely located in the continuity of a south-west/north-east orientated circulation area. The layout of the village is very regular with most buildings orientated perpendicularly to the axis of the pathway, particularly in the eastern sector. To the west of the access path, we can distinguish four buildings. The westernmost of these is perhaps the most easily identifiable; the small building, measuring 4 m by 6 m and orientated east/west, is composed of relatively large piles. The roof and foundation piles, intended to support the roof ridge and sill beams, are generally over 12 cm in diameter and, based on field observations and the heights of the surviving cones, appear to be of hard wood. Located a short distance to the north-east, we observe a second similar building. Also orientated east/west, this small building (4 x 7 m) is formed of three rows of posts; it too is supported on relatively large piles. An enigmatic building lies in the southern part of the village, between the inner and middle palisades. Measuring about 5 by 8 m, it is directly adjacent to the pathway and the three rows of posts that delimit it are orientated north/south. The posts located at the extremities of the three rows are paired and have a diameter of more than 14 cm. The small number of piles to support the sill beams, and the absence of posts to support the cross-pieces, suggest that this building lacked a raised floor, or indeed any type of floor, and may have been open-sided. Its dimensions, its location adjacent to the pathway and its architecture do not suggest a domestic structure. While its exact function remains unknown, we could hypothesise that it acted as an area for the storage and drying of timber, or perhaps as a workshop or warehouse. The largest building in the western sector is located at the centre of the site, facing the entrance within a space marked by a very high concentration of piles. Measuring about 5 by 10 m, this building is formed of three north-south orientated rows of piles. The eastern and western rows are formed of six groups of posts that delimit five bays. The posts are generally quite substantial (between 17 and 20 cm) and are of hardwood with very well-preserved erosion cones. At the centre of the structure, the row of posts intended to support the roof ridge is clearly identifiable, particularly in the southern part of the building where they are arranged in pairs. In contrast to the central building, the roof ridges of the other buildings in the sector are orientated perpendicular to the axis of the pathway. The buildings are thus arranged adjacent to each other with their long sides orientated east-west thereby reducing their exposure to the prevailing wind which blows down the Epine Mountain. Nine rows of piles, positioned 1.5 to 2.5 m apart, are visible and their high density probably reflects the permanence of occupation at this spot, with considerable evidence for repairs and extensions. The architectural reconstruction of these buildings is somewhat trickier. The traditional widespread model of buildings composed of three rows of weight-bearing posts would allow us to envisage three buildings measuring about 4 by 12 m. For the first time in Savoie and Haute Savoie, we have been able to obtain the partial plan of a lakeside village dating to the third millennium BCE. The extensive topographical survey covering an area of 2500 m² has yielded concrete evidence regarding the organization of the village and the structuring of its principal constituent planimetric elements. The unique and rich nature of the site stems from its probable short duration, which allows us to identify the general layout of the habitation areas and storage areas. francaisLe site d'Aiguebelette-le-Lac/Beau-Phare se trouve dans la partie meridionale du lac, sur une avancee de la plateforme littorale formant une presqu'ile etroite. A faible profondeur, la station est reperee des 1863 et fait l'objet de ramassages jusqu'au debut du XXe siecle. Dans le cadre de l'operation de suivi dirigee par Y. Billaud (2015-2018) suite a l'inscription de la station sur la liste du Patrimoine mondial de l'Unesco (2011), un bilan sanitaire et documentaire du site a ete realise en 2016. La synthese des donnees issues des operations de R. Laurent (1971) et d'A. Marguet (1983 et 1998), couplee a une courte mission de terrain a permis de progresser dans la connaissance du site. Afin de poursuivre l'exploration de ce site et documenter, pour la premiere fois en Savoie, le plan d'un village littoral du Neolithique final, une operation de prospection subaquatique s'est deroulee en 2018. L'objectif de cette campagne a ete de realiser un releve du champ de pieux afin de disposer d'une vue generale de la structuration de l'habitat. L'originalite de ce site palafittique consiste en un chemin d'acces barre d'au moins trois palissades. Le plan villageois, tres regulier, s'organise selon une orientation preferentielle a la perpendiculaire de l'axe du chemin, tout particulierement pour le secteur est ou quatre bâtiments de 5 × 10 m environ sont accoles par leurs murs gouttereaux. A l'ouest du chemin, au moins deux bâtiments se distinguent nettement : un premier, le long du chemin, fait face a l'entree ; un second se situe entre deux palissades. En l'etat actuel des recherches, pres de douze pieux dates par dendrochronologie permettent une premiere esquisse de l'occupation du village avec une date en -2693 obtenue sur deux pieux en sapin disposes de part et d'autre de la palissade interne. Quatre bois de cette derniere ont ete abattus en -2684. Enfin plusieurs dates obtenues sur les alignements de pieux au sud du site archeologique plaident pour une construction du chemin d'acces en -2672.","PeriodicalId":375388,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin de la Société préhistorique française","volume":"170 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"L’habitat Néolithique final de Beau Phare à Aiguebelette-le-Lac (Savoie) : nouvelles approches méthodologiques de la planimétrie d’un village littoral de l’arc alpin\",\"authors\":\"R. Brigand, Y. Billaud\",\"doi\":\"10.3406/bspf.2019.15052\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"EnglishThe site of Aiguebelette-le-Lac / Beau-Phare is one of two final Neolithic settlement sites on Lake Aiguebelette. It is located in the southern part of the lake, on an extension of the shore platform, which forms a small peninsula to the north of Lepin Castel. Situated in shallow water (between 0.5 and 2 m in depth), the site was first identified in 1863 and was a focus for artefact collecting until the beginning of the 20th century. Following the inclusion of the site on the Unesco list of World Heritage Sites in 2011, Y. Billaud undertook the direction of a monitoring project, which included a condition assessment and bibliographic survey of the site conducted in 2016. A review of data produced by R. Laurent (1971) and A. Marguet (1983 and 1998), coupled with a short fieldwork campaign, significantly advanced our knowledge of the site. The extent of the site was established and an entrance path, which traversed three palisades, was identified and mapped. An area of 100 m² at the centre of the site was surveyed, bringing the total area recorded to 230 m². As part of the continuing exploration of the site, an underwater survey was carried out in 2018. The aim of this campaign was to plot the surviving timber piles in order to obtain an overview of the layout of the village. Prior to the recording of the piles, a 3600 m² grid was laid out. Depending on the area of the site and the density of piles, each 10x10 m square was subdivided into four intermediate units, each measuring 25 m². Some 1401 piles were plotted within an area 2600 m², which brings the number of recorded piles to 1670 out of a total of about 3000 for the entire site. The survey report throws considerable new light on the layout of the site. The gently curving access trackway crosses the village and extends as far as the northern extremity of the peninsula. It is formed by two parallel rows of piles, positioned some 1.6 to 2 m apart. The line of the path has been traced over a distance of about 90 m. Located to the east of the central axis of the peninsula, the trackway slopes gently upwards (0.7%) as far as the inner palisade before rising more steeply at the entrance to the village. It is formed of almost 290 piles, which are predominantly small in diameter and protrude only slightly above the sediments. The most evident entrance to the village is located on the axis of this trackway. It is formed of two rows of contiguous piles, which form a narrow bottleneck measuring less than 1 m in width. Some dendrochronological dates suggest it was built with trees felled in -2672. At least three palisades have been identified, representing several phases of building and re-building. The outer palisade forms the first enclosing element, which would have been encountered by approaching the site from the south. On the western side of the trackway, a single line of posts can be observed while to the east three roughly parallel lines are visible. The middle palisade features a marked dissymmetry between the sections to the east and west of the trackway. On the western side, it is composed of 24 piles spread out over a length of about 25 m. To the east of the trackway, its morphology is similar over a length of about 7 m: it is composed of densely spaced piles, which are medium size and very eroded. The line of the inner palisade is difficult to discern apart from an initial section at the east and a second section corresponding to the topographical ???centre??? the 1998 survey. Four piles belong to trees felled in -2684. The two segments of this palisade are typologically similar to the middle palisade: they are composed of piles of various dimensions, but always quite small, which are positioned very close together (less than about 0,5 m apart). The easternmost section is interesting because it does not form a straight line but instead but appears to form a dog-leg to the south-west where we observe five aligned piles. At this point, the gap in the palisade resembles an entrance and is precisely located in the continuity of a south-west/north-east orientated circulation area. The layout of the village is very regular with most buildings orientated perpendicularly to the axis of the pathway, particularly in the eastern sector. To the west of the access path, we can distinguish four buildings. The westernmost of these is perhaps the most easily identifiable; the small building, measuring 4 m by 6 m and orientated east/west, is composed of relatively large piles. The roof and foundation piles, intended to support the roof ridge and sill beams, are generally over 12 cm in diameter and, based on field observations and the heights of the surviving cones, appear to be of hard wood. Located a short distance to the north-east, we observe a second similar building. Also orientated east/west, this small building (4 x 7 m) is formed of three rows of posts; it too is supported on relatively large piles. An enigmatic building lies in the southern part of the village, between the inner and middle palisades. Measuring about 5 by 8 m, it is directly adjacent to the pathway and the three rows of posts that delimit it are orientated north/south. The posts located at the extremities of the three rows are paired and have a diameter of more than 14 cm. The small number of piles to support the sill beams, and the absence of posts to support the cross-pieces, suggest that this building lacked a raised floor, or indeed any type of floor, and may have been open-sided. Its dimensions, its location adjacent to the pathway and its architecture do not suggest a domestic structure. While its exact function remains unknown, we could hypothesise that it acted as an area for the storage and drying of timber, or perhaps as a workshop or warehouse. The largest building in the western sector is located at the centre of the site, facing the entrance within a space marked by a very high concentration of piles. Measuring about 5 by 10 m, this building is formed of three north-south orientated rows of piles. The eastern and western rows are formed of six groups of posts that delimit five bays. The posts are generally quite substantial (between 17 and 20 cm) and are of hardwood with very well-preserved erosion cones. At the centre of the structure, the row of posts intended to support the roof ridge is clearly identifiable, particularly in the southern part of the building where they are arranged in pairs. In contrast to the central building, the roof ridges of the other buildings in the sector are orientated perpendicular to the axis of the pathway. The buildings are thus arranged adjacent to each other with their long sides orientated east-west thereby reducing their exposure to the prevailing wind which blows down the Epine Mountain. Nine rows of piles, positioned 1.5 to 2.5 m apart, are visible and their high density probably reflects the permanence of occupation at this spot, with considerable evidence for repairs and extensions. The architectural reconstruction of these buildings is somewhat trickier. The traditional widespread model of buildings composed of three rows of weight-bearing posts would allow us to envisage three buildings measuring about 4 by 12 m. For the first time in Savoie and Haute Savoie, we have been able to obtain the partial plan of a lakeside village dating to the third millennium BCE. The extensive topographical survey covering an area of 2500 m² has yielded concrete evidence regarding the organization of the village and the structuring of its principal constituent planimetric elements. The unique and rich nature of the site stems from its probable short duration, which allows us to identify the general layout of the habitation areas and storage areas. francaisLe site d'Aiguebelette-le-Lac/Beau-Phare se trouve dans la partie meridionale du lac, sur une avancee de la plateforme littorale formant une presqu'ile etroite. A faible profondeur, la station est reperee des 1863 et fait l'objet de ramassages jusqu'au debut du XXe siecle. Dans le cadre de l'operation de suivi dirigee par Y. Billaud (2015-2018) suite a l'inscription de la station sur la liste du Patrimoine mondial de l'Unesco (2011), un bilan sanitaire et documentaire du site a ete realise en 2016. La synthese des donnees issues des operations de R. Laurent (1971) et d'A. Marguet (1983 et 1998), couplee a une courte mission de terrain a permis de progresser dans la connaissance du site. Afin de poursuivre l'exploration de ce site et documenter, pour la premiere fois en Savoie, le plan d'un village littoral du Neolithique final, une operation de prospection subaquatique s'est deroulee en 2018. L'objectif de cette campagne a ete de realiser un releve du champ de pieux afin de disposer d'une vue generale de la structuration de l'habitat. L'originalite de ce site palafittique consiste en un chemin d'acces barre d'au moins trois palissades. Le plan villageois, tres regulier, s'organise selon une orientation preferentielle a la perpendiculaire de l'axe du chemin, tout particulierement pour le secteur est ou quatre bâtiments de 5 × 10 m environ sont accoles par leurs murs gouttereaux. A l'ouest du chemin, au moins deux bâtiments se distinguent nettement : un premier, le long du chemin, fait face a l'entree ; un second se situe entre deux palissades. En l'etat actuel des recherches, pres de douze pieux dates par dendrochronologie permettent une premiere esquisse de l'occupation du village avec une date en -2693 obtenue sur deux pieux en sapin disposes de part et d'autre de la palissade interne. Quatre bois de cette derniere ont ete abattus en -2684. Enfin plusieurs dates obtenues sur les alignements de pieux au sud du site archeologique plaident pour une construction du chemin d'acces en -2672.\",\"PeriodicalId\":375388,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin de la Société préhistorique française\",\"volume\":\"170 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin de la Société préhistorique française\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3406/bspf.2019.15052\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin de la Société préhistorique française","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3406/bspf.2019.15052","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
Aiguebelette-le- lac / beauphare遗址是Aiguebelette湖上最后的两个新石器时代定居点之一。它位于湖泊的南部,在海岸平台的延伸上,形成了勒平城堡北部的一个小半岛。该遗址位于浅水区(0.5至2米深),于1863年首次被发现,直到20世纪初,它一直是人工制品收集的焦点。继2011年该遗址被列入联合国教科文组织世界遗产名录后,Y. Billaud负责了一个监测项目的指导,其中包括2016年对该遗址进行的状况评估和书目调查。对R. Laurent(1971年)和A. Marguet(1983年和1998年)提供的数据的回顾,加上短暂的实地考察活动,大大提高了我们对该遗址的认识。确定了场地的范围,并确定了穿过三个栅栏的入口路径,并绘制了地图。在场地中心的100平方米的区域进行了调查,使记录的总面积达到230平方米。作为对该遗址持续探索的一部分,2018年进行了水下调查。这次活动的目的是绘制幸存的木桩,以便获得村庄布局的概述。在记录桩之前,布置了一个3600平方米的网格。根据场地的面积和桩的密度,每个10 × 10 m的正方形被细分为四个中间单元,每个单元的面积为25 m²。在2600平方米的区域内绘制了大约1401个桩,这使得整个站点的记录桩数达到1670个,而整个站点的记录桩总数约为3000个。调查报告对该遗址的布局有了新的认识。平缓弯曲的入口轨道穿过村庄,一直延伸到半岛的北端。它由两排平行的桩组成,相距约1.6至2米。这条小路已经画了大约90米的距离。轨道位于半岛中轴线以东,平缓向上倾斜(0.7%),直至内栅栏,然后在村庄入口处陡然上升。它由近290个桩组成,这些桩主要直径很小,仅略高于沉积物。最明显的村庄入口位于这条轨道的轴线上。它由两排相邻的桩组成,形成一个宽度小于1米的狭窄瓶颈。一些树木年代学日期表明,它是用-2672年砍伐的树木建造的。至少有三个栅栏已经确定,代表了几个阶段的建设和重建。外部栅栏形成了第一个封闭元素,从南面接近场地时可能会遇到它。在轨道的西侧,可以看到一条单线的柱子,而在东侧,可以看到三条大致平行的线。中间的栅栏在轨道的东西部分之间有明显的不对称。在西侧,它由24根桩组成,长度约为25米。在轨道东侧,其形态相似,长度约为7 m,由密集的桩组成,桩的大小中等,侵蚀严重。除了东部的初始部分和与地形“中心”相对应的第二部分外,内栅栏的线条很难辨认。1998年的调查。四桩属于-2684年砍伐的树木。这个栅栏的两个部分在类型学上与中间栅栏相似:它们由各种尺寸的桩组成,但总是很小,它们的位置非常靠近(相距不到0.5米)。最东端的部分很有趣,因为它没有形成一条直线,而是在西南方向形成一条狗腿,在那里我们观察到五个排列整齐的桩。在这一点上,栅栏的缝隙类似于一个入口,并精确地位于西南/东北方向的流通区域的连续性中。村庄的布局非常规则,大多数建筑垂直于小路的轴线,特别是在东部地区。在入口通道的西面,我们可以区分出四栋建筑。其中最西端的可能是最容易辨认的;这个小建筑长4米,宽6米,东/西朝向,由相对较大的桩组成。用于支撑屋脊和基梁的屋顶和基桩直径一般超过12厘米,根据现场观察和现存锥的高度,似乎是由硬木制成的。在东北不远的地方,我们看到了第二座类似的建筑。同样面向东/西,这个小建筑(4 × 7米)由三排柱子组成;它也由相对较大的桩支撑。 一座神秘的建筑位于村庄的南部,位于内栅栏和中栅栏之间。它的尺寸约为5米乘8米,与通道直接相邻,三排柱子将其划分为南北方向。位于三排两端的柱子是成对的,直径超过14厘米。支撑窗台梁的桩基数量很少,而且没有支撑横梁的柱子,这表明这座建筑没有凸起的地板,或者实际上没有任何类型的地板,可能是开放式的。它的尺寸,它毗邻道路的位置和它的建筑都不像是一个家庭结构。虽然它的确切功能尚不清楚,但我们可以假设它是一个储存和干燥木材的区域,或者可能是一个车间或仓库。西部最大的建筑位于基地的中心,面对着一个高度集中的空间的入口。该建筑约5米乘10米,由三排南北方向的桩组成。东行和西行由六组柱子组成,这些柱子划分了五个海湾。柱子通常相当坚固(在17到20厘米之间),由硬木制成,具有保存完好的侵蚀锥。在结构的中心,用于支撑屋脊的一排柱子清晰可辨,特别是在建筑的南部,它们成对排列。与中心建筑形成鲜明对比的是,该区域其他建筑的屋脊垂直于通道的轴线。因此,这些建筑彼此相邻,它们的长边面向东西,从而减少了它们暴露在从Epine山吹下来的盛行风中的机会。九排桩,相距1.5到2.5米,可见,它们的高密度可能反映了在这个地方的永久性占用,有大量的维修和扩建的证据。这些建筑物的建筑重建有些棘手。传统的由三排承重柱子组成的建筑模型允许我们设想三栋大约4米乘12米的建筑。在萨瓦省和上萨瓦省,我们第一次获得了一个湖边村庄的部分平面图,这个村庄可以追溯到公元前三千年。在2500平方米的范围内进行了广泛的地形调查,得出了关于村庄组织及其主要组成平面元素结构的具体证据。场地的独特和丰富的性质源于其可能的短暂持续时间,这使我们能够确定居住区域和存储区域的总体布局。法国通道站点d'Aiguebelette-le-Lac/ beauphare se trouve dans la partie meridionale du lac, sur une avancee de la plateforme littorale formant une prequ 'ile etroite。一个可靠的大师,在1863年的一次演出中,他被称为“毁灭的对象”,而在20世纪的第一次演出中则被称为“毁灭的对象”。《联合国教科文组织世界遗产名录》(2011),《联合国教科文组织世界遗产名录》(2011),《联合国教科文组织世界遗产名录》(2015-2018),《联合国教科文组织世界遗产名录》(2015-2018),《联合国教科文组织世界遗产名录》(2016)。洛朗(1971)等。Marguet(1983年和1998年),夫妇一个法院的任务是地形,一个许可的进展者,在土地上的connaissance。2018年,在“探索遗址和文献”项目中,在“萨瓦”项目中,在“新石器”项目中,在“滨海村庄”项目中,在“海底勘探”项目中,在“海底勘探”项目中,在“海底勘探”项目中。我们的目标是实现我们的目标,我们的目标是实现我们的目标,我们的目标是实现我们的目标,我们的目标是实现我们的目标,我们的目标是实现我们的目标,我们的目标是实现我们的目标。“原生态建筑”的设计包含了三种不同的建筑形式。Le plan villageois, tree regular, s' '组织selon one orientation优先选择la aire de l'axe du chemin,特别推荐Le。A l'ouest du chemin, au moins deux batisments有不同的表述:unpremier, le long du chemin, fait face A l'entree;联合国第二处双栅栏中心。在这一过程中,我们发现了一种特殊的现象,那就是,我们发现了一种特殊的现象,那就是我们发现了一种特殊的现象,我们发现了一种特殊的现象。四分之一的bois de cette derniere not et abattus en -2684。最后几个日期卡会在莱斯对准de pieux盟sud du网站archeologique plaident倒一个建筑du chemin d 'acces en -2672。
L’habitat Néolithique final de Beau Phare à Aiguebelette-le-Lac (Savoie) : nouvelles approches méthodologiques de la planimétrie d’un village littoral de l’arc alpin
EnglishThe site of Aiguebelette-le-Lac / Beau-Phare is one of two final Neolithic settlement sites on Lake Aiguebelette. It is located in the southern part of the lake, on an extension of the shore platform, which forms a small peninsula to the north of Lepin Castel. Situated in shallow water (between 0.5 and 2 m in depth), the site was first identified in 1863 and was a focus for artefact collecting until the beginning of the 20th century. Following the inclusion of the site on the Unesco list of World Heritage Sites in 2011, Y. Billaud undertook the direction of a monitoring project, which included a condition assessment and bibliographic survey of the site conducted in 2016. A review of data produced by R. Laurent (1971) and A. Marguet (1983 and 1998), coupled with a short fieldwork campaign, significantly advanced our knowledge of the site. The extent of the site was established and an entrance path, which traversed three palisades, was identified and mapped. An area of 100 m² at the centre of the site was surveyed, bringing the total area recorded to 230 m². As part of the continuing exploration of the site, an underwater survey was carried out in 2018. The aim of this campaign was to plot the surviving timber piles in order to obtain an overview of the layout of the village. Prior to the recording of the piles, a 3600 m² grid was laid out. Depending on the area of the site and the density of piles, each 10x10 m square was subdivided into four intermediate units, each measuring 25 m². Some 1401 piles were plotted within an area 2600 m², which brings the number of recorded piles to 1670 out of a total of about 3000 for the entire site. The survey report throws considerable new light on the layout of the site. The gently curving access trackway crosses the village and extends as far as the northern extremity of the peninsula. It is formed by two parallel rows of piles, positioned some 1.6 to 2 m apart. The line of the path has been traced over a distance of about 90 m. Located to the east of the central axis of the peninsula, the trackway slopes gently upwards (0.7%) as far as the inner palisade before rising more steeply at the entrance to the village. It is formed of almost 290 piles, which are predominantly small in diameter and protrude only slightly above the sediments. The most evident entrance to the village is located on the axis of this trackway. It is formed of two rows of contiguous piles, which form a narrow bottleneck measuring less than 1 m in width. Some dendrochronological dates suggest it was built with trees felled in -2672. At least three palisades have been identified, representing several phases of building and re-building. The outer palisade forms the first enclosing element, which would have been encountered by approaching the site from the south. On the western side of the trackway, a single line of posts can be observed while to the east three roughly parallel lines are visible. The middle palisade features a marked dissymmetry between the sections to the east and west of the trackway. On the western side, it is composed of 24 piles spread out over a length of about 25 m. To the east of the trackway, its morphology is similar over a length of about 7 m: it is composed of densely spaced piles, which are medium size and very eroded. The line of the inner palisade is difficult to discern apart from an initial section at the east and a second section corresponding to the topographical ???centre??? the 1998 survey. Four piles belong to trees felled in -2684. The two segments of this palisade are typologically similar to the middle palisade: they are composed of piles of various dimensions, but always quite small, which are positioned very close together (less than about 0,5 m apart). The easternmost section is interesting because it does not form a straight line but instead but appears to form a dog-leg to the south-west where we observe five aligned piles. At this point, the gap in the palisade resembles an entrance and is precisely located in the continuity of a south-west/north-east orientated circulation area. The layout of the village is very regular with most buildings orientated perpendicularly to the axis of the pathway, particularly in the eastern sector. To the west of the access path, we can distinguish four buildings. The westernmost of these is perhaps the most easily identifiable; the small building, measuring 4 m by 6 m and orientated east/west, is composed of relatively large piles. The roof and foundation piles, intended to support the roof ridge and sill beams, are generally over 12 cm in diameter and, based on field observations and the heights of the surviving cones, appear to be of hard wood. Located a short distance to the north-east, we observe a second similar building. Also orientated east/west, this small building (4 x 7 m) is formed of three rows of posts; it too is supported on relatively large piles. An enigmatic building lies in the southern part of the village, between the inner and middle palisades. Measuring about 5 by 8 m, it is directly adjacent to the pathway and the three rows of posts that delimit it are orientated north/south. The posts located at the extremities of the three rows are paired and have a diameter of more than 14 cm. The small number of piles to support the sill beams, and the absence of posts to support the cross-pieces, suggest that this building lacked a raised floor, or indeed any type of floor, and may have been open-sided. Its dimensions, its location adjacent to the pathway and its architecture do not suggest a domestic structure. While its exact function remains unknown, we could hypothesise that it acted as an area for the storage and drying of timber, or perhaps as a workshop or warehouse. The largest building in the western sector is located at the centre of the site, facing the entrance within a space marked by a very high concentration of piles. Measuring about 5 by 10 m, this building is formed of three north-south orientated rows of piles. The eastern and western rows are formed of six groups of posts that delimit five bays. The posts are generally quite substantial (between 17 and 20 cm) and are of hardwood with very well-preserved erosion cones. At the centre of the structure, the row of posts intended to support the roof ridge is clearly identifiable, particularly in the southern part of the building where they are arranged in pairs. In contrast to the central building, the roof ridges of the other buildings in the sector are orientated perpendicular to the axis of the pathway. The buildings are thus arranged adjacent to each other with their long sides orientated east-west thereby reducing their exposure to the prevailing wind which blows down the Epine Mountain. Nine rows of piles, positioned 1.5 to 2.5 m apart, are visible and their high density probably reflects the permanence of occupation at this spot, with considerable evidence for repairs and extensions. The architectural reconstruction of these buildings is somewhat trickier. The traditional widespread model of buildings composed of three rows of weight-bearing posts would allow us to envisage three buildings measuring about 4 by 12 m. For the first time in Savoie and Haute Savoie, we have been able to obtain the partial plan of a lakeside village dating to the third millennium BCE. The extensive topographical survey covering an area of 2500 m² has yielded concrete evidence regarding the organization of the village and the structuring of its principal constituent planimetric elements. The unique and rich nature of the site stems from its probable short duration, which allows us to identify the general layout of the habitation areas and storage areas. francaisLe site d'Aiguebelette-le-Lac/Beau-Phare se trouve dans la partie meridionale du lac, sur une avancee de la plateforme littorale formant une presqu'ile etroite. A faible profondeur, la station est reperee des 1863 et fait l'objet de ramassages jusqu'au debut du XXe siecle. Dans le cadre de l'operation de suivi dirigee par Y. Billaud (2015-2018) suite a l'inscription de la station sur la liste du Patrimoine mondial de l'Unesco (2011), un bilan sanitaire et documentaire du site a ete realise en 2016. La synthese des donnees issues des operations de R. Laurent (1971) et d'A. Marguet (1983 et 1998), couplee a une courte mission de terrain a permis de progresser dans la connaissance du site. Afin de poursuivre l'exploration de ce site et documenter, pour la premiere fois en Savoie, le plan d'un village littoral du Neolithique final, une operation de prospection subaquatique s'est deroulee en 2018. L'objectif de cette campagne a ete de realiser un releve du champ de pieux afin de disposer d'une vue generale de la structuration de l'habitat. L'originalite de ce site palafittique consiste en un chemin d'acces barre d'au moins trois palissades. Le plan villageois, tres regulier, s'organise selon une orientation preferentielle a la perpendiculaire de l'axe du chemin, tout particulierement pour le secteur est ou quatre bâtiments de 5 × 10 m environ sont accoles par leurs murs gouttereaux. A l'ouest du chemin, au moins deux bâtiments se distinguent nettement : un premier, le long du chemin, fait face a l'entree ; un second se situe entre deux palissades. En l'etat actuel des recherches, pres de douze pieux dates par dendrochronologie permettent une premiere esquisse de l'occupation du village avec une date en -2693 obtenue sur deux pieux en sapin disposes de part et d'autre de la palissade interne. Quatre bois de cette derniere ont ete abattus en -2684. Enfin plusieurs dates obtenues sur les alignements de pieux au sud du site archeologique plaident pour une construction du chemin d'acces en -2672.