超国家宪法主义:欧洲的情况

Mauricio Fioravantti
{"title":"超国家宪法主义:欧洲的情况","authors":"Mauricio Fioravantti","doi":"10.5354/RCHD.V0I22.22164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper the author argues that, historically, it is possible to recognize a \"dual purpose\" inconstitutionalism the first: the construction of limitations and safeguards in opposition to sovereingpower, in order to defend spheres of autonomy and rights, and the second: participation inthe construction of such power, with the element of consent and the obvious purpose to betterensure the same spheres and rights throughout the scope of sovereign power. It is about, inconsequence, of the two movements of constitutionalism: the resistance and parcipation. Theauthor notes that the constitutionalism of our time, chareacterized by the irreversible tendencyto leave the state and national boundaries, in order to build a system at an intemational level,is also an evidence of this \"dual purpose\", being the reason why one of them xonceming therights, can not ignore the order- the relative with politics.","PeriodicalId":153786,"journal":{"name":"Revista Chilena de Historia del Derecho","volume":"128 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Il constituzionalismo nella dimensione sovranazionale: il caso europeo\",\"authors\":\"Mauricio Fioravantti\",\"doi\":\"10.5354/RCHD.V0I22.22164\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper the author argues that, historically, it is possible to recognize a \\\"dual purpose\\\" inconstitutionalism the first: the construction of limitations and safeguards in opposition to sovereingpower, in order to defend spheres of autonomy and rights, and the second: participation inthe construction of such power, with the element of consent and the obvious purpose to betterensure the same spheres and rights throughout the scope of sovereign power. It is about, inconsequence, of the two movements of constitutionalism: the resistance and parcipation. Theauthor notes that the constitutionalism of our time, chareacterized by the irreversible tendencyto leave the state and national boundaries, in order to build a system at an intemational level,is also an evidence of this \\\"dual purpose\\\", being the reason why one of them xonceming therights, can not ignore the order- the relative with politics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":153786,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Chilena de Historia del Derecho\",\"volume\":\"128 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Chilena de Historia del Derecho\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5354/RCHD.V0I22.22164\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Chilena de Historia del Derecho","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5354/RCHD.V0I22.22164","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本文中,作者认为,从历史上看,有可能认识到一种“双重目的”的违宪主义:第一:建立与主权权力相对立的限制和保障,以捍卫自治和权利领域;第二:参与这种权力的建设,以同意的要素和明显的目的,在整个主权权力范围内更好地确保相同的领域和权利。它是关于两种宪政运动:抵抗运动和参与运动。作者指出,我们这个时代的宪政,其特点是不可逆转地倾向于离开国家和民族的边界,以建立一个国际层面的制度,这也是这种“双重目的”的证据,这就是为什么其中一个权利,不能忽视秩序-与政治的相对关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Il constituzionalismo nella dimensione sovranazionale: il caso europeo
In this paper the author argues that, historically, it is possible to recognize a "dual purpose" inconstitutionalism the first: the construction of limitations and safeguards in opposition to sovereingpower, in order to defend spheres of autonomy and rights, and the second: participation inthe construction of such power, with the element of consent and the obvious purpose to betterensure the same spheres and rights throughout the scope of sovereign power. It is about, inconsequence, of the two movements of constitutionalism: the resistance and parcipation. Theauthor notes that the constitutionalism of our time, chareacterized by the irreversible tendencyto leave the state and national boundaries, in order to build a system at an intemational level,is also an evidence of this "dual purpose", being the reason why one of them xonceming therights, can not ignore the order- the relative with politics.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信