谢拉克拉多维(罗马尼亚铁门地区)史前牛和猪的大小范围

L. Bartosiewicz, C. Bonsall, S. Stallibrass
{"title":"谢拉克拉多维(罗马尼亚铁门地区)史前牛和猪的大小范围","authors":"L. Bartosiewicz, C. Bonsall, S. Stallibrass","doi":"10.55201/tggb6710","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper summarizes osteometric data for cattle and pig from Late \nMesolithic and Early Neolithic contexts at Schela Cladovei in an attempt to \ndistinguish between the wild and domestic forms of these animals. The \ndata are compared to empirical size ranges published by Bökönyi for \naurochs (Bos primigenius) and wild pig (Sus scrofa). The results suggest the \noverwhelming majority of the bones measured fall below the median \nvalues of the wild forms. No cattle bones were recovered from secure \nMesolithic contexts and the size-range data are congruent with the view \nthat most of the cattle from the site were domestic. There is a clear overlap \nbetween the size-ranges of the pig bones from Mesolithic and Neolithic \ncontexts, which does not contradict the idea of interbreeding between wild \nand domestic populations put forward in previous studies.","PeriodicalId":226679,"journal":{"name":"Analele Banatului XIV 2006 Vol. 1","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Size Ranges of Prehistoric Cattle and Pig at Schela Cladovei (Iron Gates Region, Romania)\",\"authors\":\"L. Bartosiewicz, C. Bonsall, S. Stallibrass\",\"doi\":\"10.55201/tggb6710\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper summarizes osteometric data for cattle and pig from Late \\nMesolithic and Early Neolithic contexts at Schela Cladovei in an attempt to \\ndistinguish between the wild and domestic forms of these animals. The \\ndata are compared to empirical size ranges published by Bökönyi for \\naurochs (Bos primigenius) and wild pig (Sus scrofa). The results suggest the \\noverwhelming majority of the bones measured fall below the median \\nvalues of the wild forms. No cattle bones were recovered from secure \\nMesolithic contexts and the size-range data are congruent with the view \\nthat most of the cattle from the site were domestic. There is a clear overlap \\nbetween the size-ranges of the pig bones from Mesolithic and Neolithic \\ncontexts, which does not contradict the idea of interbreeding between wild \\nand domestic populations put forward in previous studies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":226679,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Analele Banatului XIV 2006 Vol. 1\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Analele Banatului XIV 2006 Vol. 1\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.55201/tggb6710\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analele Banatului XIV 2006 Vol. 1","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55201/tggb6710","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

本文总结了舍拉克拉多维中石器时代晚期和新石器时代早期的牛和猪的骨测量数据,试图区分这些动物的野生和家养形式。将这些数据与Bökönyi公布的原牛(Bos primigenius)和野猪(Sus scrofa)的经验尺寸范围进行比较。结果表明,绝大多数测量到的骨头都低于野生形式的中值。在安全的中石器时代环境中没有发现牛骨,尺寸范围的数据与该地点的大多数牛是驯养的观点一致。在中石器时代和新石器时代背景下的猪骨头的大小范围之间有明显的重叠,这与先前研究中提出的野生种群和家养种群之间杂交的观点并不矛盾。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Size Ranges of Prehistoric Cattle and Pig at Schela Cladovei (Iron Gates Region, Romania)
This paper summarizes osteometric data for cattle and pig from Late Mesolithic and Early Neolithic contexts at Schela Cladovei in an attempt to distinguish between the wild and domestic forms of these animals. The data are compared to empirical size ranges published by Bökönyi for aurochs (Bos primigenius) and wild pig (Sus scrofa). The results suggest the overwhelming majority of the bones measured fall below the median values of the wild forms. No cattle bones were recovered from secure Mesolithic contexts and the size-range data are congruent with the view that most of the cattle from the site were domestic. There is a clear overlap between the size-ranges of the pig bones from Mesolithic and Neolithic contexts, which does not contradict the idea of interbreeding between wild and domestic populations put forward in previous studies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信