{"title":"谢拉克拉多维(罗马尼亚铁门地区)史前牛和猪的大小范围","authors":"L. Bartosiewicz, C. Bonsall, S. Stallibrass","doi":"10.55201/tggb6710","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper summarizes osteometric data for cattle and pig from Late \nMesolithic and Early Neolithic contexts at Schela Cladovei in an attempt to \ndistinguish between the wild and domestic forms of these animals. The \ndata are compared to empirical size ranges published by Bökönyi for \naurochs (Bos primigenius) and wild pig (Sus scrofa). The results suggest the \noverwhelming majority of the bones measured fall below the median \nvalues of the wild forms. No cattle bones were recovered from secure \nMesolithic contexts and the size-range data are congruent with the view \nthat most of the cattle from the site were domestic. There is a clear overlap \nbetween the size-ranges of the pig bones from Mesolithic and Neolithic \ncontexts, which does not contradict the idea of interbreeding between wild \nand domestic populations put forward in previous studies.","PeriodicalId":226679,"journal":{"name":"Analele Banatului XIV 2006 Vol. 1","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Size Ranges of Prehistoric Cattle and Pig at Schela Cladovei (Iron Gates Region, Romania)\",\"authors\":\"L. Bartosiewicz, C. Bonsall, S. Stallibrass\",\"doi\":\"10.55201/tggb6710\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper summarizes osteometric data for cattle and pig from Late \\nMesolithic and Early Neolithic contexts at Schela Cladovei in an attempt to \\ndistinguish between the wild and domestic forms of these animals. The \\ndata are compared to empirical size ranges published by Bökönyi for \\naurochs (Bos primigenius) and wild pig (Sus scrofa). The results suggest the \\noverwhelming majority of the bones measured fall below the median \\nvalues of the wild forms. No cattle bones were recovered from secure \\nMesolithic contexts and the size-range data are congruent with the view \\nthat most of the cattle from the site were domestic. There is a clear overlap \\nbetween the size-ranges of the pig bones from Mesolithic and Neolithic \\ncontexts, which does not contradict the idea of interbreeding between wild \\nand domestic populations put forward in previous studies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":226679,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Analele Banatului XIV 2006 Vol. 1\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Analele Banatului XIV 2006 Vol. 1\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.55201/tggb6710\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analele Banatului XIV 2006 Vol. 1","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55201/tggb6710","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Size Ranges of Prehistoric Cattle and Pig at Schela Cladovei (Iron Gates Region, Romania)
This paper summarizes osteometric data for cattle and pig from Late
Mesolithic and Early Neolithic contexts at Schela Cladovei in an attempt to
distinguish between the wild and domestic forms of these animals. The
data are compared to empirical size ranges published by Bökönyi for
aurochs (Bos primigenius) and wild pig (Sus scrofa). The results suggest the
overwhelming majority of the bones measured fall below the median
values of the wild forms. No cattle bones were recovered from secure
Mesolithic contexts and the size-range data are congruent with the view
that most of the cattle from the site were domestic. There is a clear overlap
between the size-ranges of the pig bones from Mesolithic and Neolithic
contexts, which does not contradict the idea of interbreeding between wild
and domestic populations put forward in previous studies.