概率地质导向工作流程中多测井曲线联合反演提高深感井电磁仪器的可探测性

N. Jahani, S. Alyaev, J. Ambía, K. Fossum, E. Suter, C. Torres‐Verdín
{"title":"概率地质导向工作流程中多测井曲线联合反演提高深感井电磁仪器的可探测性","authors":"N. Jahani, S. Alyaev, J. Ambía, K. Fossum, E. Suter, C. Torres‐Verdín","doi":"10.30632/pjv64n1-2023a6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The cost of drilling wells on the Norwegian Continental Shelf is exceptionally high, and hydrocarbon reservoirs are often located in spatially complex rock formations. Optimized well placement with real-time geosteering is crucial to efficiently produce from such reservoirs and reduce exploration and development costs. Geosteering is commonly assisted by repeated formation evaluation based on the interpretation of well logs while drilling. Thus, reliable, computationally efficient, and robust workflows that can interpret well logs and capture uncertainties in real time are necessary for successful well placement. We present a formation evaluation workflow for geosteering that implements an iterative version of an ensemble-based method, namely the approximate Levenberg-Marquardt form of the Ensemble Randomized Maximum Likelihood (LM-EnRML). The workflow jointly estimates the petrophysical and geological model parameters and their uncertainties. This paper demonstrates joint estimation of layer-by-layer water saturation, porosity, and layer-boundary locations and inference of layers’ resistivities and densities. The parameters are estimated by minimizing the statistical misfit between the simulated and the observed measurements for several logs on different scales simultaneously (i.e., shallow-sensing nuclear density and shallow to extra-deep electromagnetic (EM) logs). Numerical experiments performed on a synthetic example verified that the iterative ensemble-based method could estimate multiple petrophysical parameters and decrease their uncertainties in a fraction of the time compared to classical Monte Carlo methods. Extra-deep EM measurements provide the best reliable information for geosteering, and we show that they can be interpreted within the proposed workflow. However, we also observe that the parameter uncertainties noticeably decrease when deep-sensing EM logs are combined with shallow-sensing nuclear density logs. Importantly, the estimation quality increases not only in the proximity of the shallow tool but also extends to the look ahead of the extra-deep EM capabilities. We specifically quantify how shallow data can lead to significant uncertainty reduction of the boundary positions ahead of the bit, which is crucial for geosteering decisions and reservoir mapping.","PeriodicalId":170688,"journal":{"name":"Petrophysics – The SPWLA Journal of Formation Evaluation and Reservoir Description","volume":"45 1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhancing the Detectability of Deep-Sensing Borehole Electromagnetic Instruments by Joint Inversion of Multiple Logs Within a Probabilistic Geosteering Workflow\",\"authors\":\"N. Jahani, S. Alyaev, J. Ambía, K. Fossum, E. Suter, C. Torres‐Verdín\",\"doi\":\"10.30632/pjv64n1-2023a6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The cost of drilling wells on the Norwegian Continental Shelf is exceptionally high, and hydrocarbon reservoirs are often located in spatially complex rock formations. Optimized well placement with real-time geosteering is crucial to efficiently produce from such reservoirs and reduce exploration and development costs. Geosteering is commonly assisted by repeated formation evaluation based on the interpretation of well logs while drilling. Thus, reliable, computationally efficient, and robust workflows that can interpret well logs and capture uncertainties in real time are necessary for successful well placement. We present a formation evaluation workflow for geosteering that implements an iterative version of an ensemble-based method, namely the approximate Levenberg-Marquardt form of the Ensemble Randomized Maximum Likelihood (LM-EnRML). The workflow jointly estimates the petrophysical and geological model parameters and their uncertainties. This paper demonstrates joint estimation of layer-by-layer water saturation, porosity, and layer-boundary locations and inference of layers’ resistivities and densities. The parameters are estimated by minimizing the statistical misfit between the simulated and the observed measurements for several logs on different scales simultaneously (i.e., shallow-sensing nuclear density and shallow to extra-deep electromagnetic (EM) logs). Numerical experiments performed on a synthetic example verified that the iterative ensemble-based method could estimate multiple petrophysical parameters and decrease their uncertainties in a fraction of the time compared to classical Monte Carlo methods. Extra-deep EM measurements provide the best reliable information for geosteering, and we show that they can be interpreted within the proposed workflow. However, we also observe that the parameter uncertainties noticeably decrease when deep-sensing EM logs are combined with shallow-sensing nuclear density logs. Importantly, the estimation quality increases not only in the proximity of the shallow tool but also extends to the look ahead of the extra-deep EM capabilities. We specifically quantify how shallow data can lead to significant uncertainty reduction of the boundary positions ahead of the bit, which is crucial for geosteering decisions and reservoir mapping.\",\"PeriodicalId\":170688,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Petrophysics – The SPWLA Journal of Formation Evaluation and Reservoir Description\",\"volume\":\"45 1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Petrophysics – The SPWLA Journal of Formation Evaluation and Reservoir Description\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30632/pjv64n1-2023a6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Petrophysics – The SPWLA Journal of Formation Evaluation and Reservoir Description","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30632/pjv64n1-2023a6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

挪威大陆架的钻井成本非常高,而且油气储层通常位于空间复杂的岩层中。利用实时地质导向优化井位对于有效开采此类油藏、降低勘探开发成本至关重要。地质导向通常通过在钻井过程中根据测井资料进行反复的地层评价来辅助。因此,可靠、计算效率高、健壮的工作流程,能够实时解释测井曲线并捕捉不确定性,对于成功的下井至关重要。我们提出了一种用于地质导向的地层评估工作流程,该工作流程实现了基于集成方法的迭代版本,即集成随机最大似然(LM-EnRML)的近似Levenberg-Marquardt形式。该工作流程联合估计岩石物理和地质模型参数及其不确定性。本文论证了层间含水饱和度、孔隙度、层间边界位置的联合估计,以及层间电阻率和密度的联合推断。参数的估计是通过最小化不同尺度(即浅层感应核密度和浅层至超深电磁(EM)测井)同时进行的模拟和观测测量之间的统计不拟合来实现的。在一个综合算例上进行的数值实验证明,与经典的蒙特卡罗方法相比,基于迭代集合的方法可以在很短的时间内估计多个岩石物理参数,并降低它们的不确定性。超深电磁测量为地质导向提供了最可靠的信息,并且可以在建议的工作流程中进行解释。然而,我们也观察到,当深感电磁测井与浅感核密度测井相结合时,参数的不确定性明显降低。重要的是,不仅在浅层工具附近,而且还扩展到超深EM功能之前的估计质量。我们具体量化了浅层数据如何显著降低钻头前边界位置的不确定性,这对于地质导向决策和储层测绘至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Enhancing the Detectability of Deep-Sensing Borehole Electromagnetic Instruments by Joint Inversion of Multiple Logs Within a Probabilistic Geosteering Workflow
The cost of drilling wells on the Norwegian Continental Shelf is exceptionally high, and hydrocarbon reservoirs are often located in spatially complex rock formations. Optimized well placement with real-time geosteering is crucial to efficiently produce from such reservoirs and reduce exploration and development costs. Geosteering is commonly assisted by repeated formation evaluation based on the interpretation of well logs while drilling. Thus, reliable, computationally efficient, and robust workflows that can interpret well logs and capture uncertainties in real time are necessary for successful well placement. We present a formation evaluation workflow for geosteering that implements an iterative version of an ensemble-based method, namely the approximate Levenberg-Marquardt form of the Ensemble Randomized Maximum Likelihood (LM-EnRML). The workflow jointly estimates the petrophysical and geological model parameters and their uncertainties. This paper demonstrates joint estimation of layer-by-layer water saturation, porosity, and layer-boundary locations and inference of layers’ resistivities and densities. The parameters are estimated by minimizing the statistical misfit between the simulated and the observed measurements for several logs on different scales simultaneously (i.e., shallow-sensing nuclear density and shallow to extra-deep electromagnetic (EM) logs). Numerical experiments performed on a synthetic example verified that the iterative ensemble-based method could estimate multiple petrophysical parameters and decrease their uncertainties in a fraction of the time compared to classical Monte Carlo methods. Extra-deep EM measurements provide the best reliable information for geosteering, and we show that they can be interpreted within the proposed workflow. However, we also observe that the parameter uncertainties noticeably decrease when deep-sensing EM logs are combined with shallow-sensing nuclear density logs. Importantly, the estimation quality increases not only in the proximity of the shallow tool but also extends to the look ahead of the extra-deep EM capabilities. We specifically quantify how shallow data can lead to significant uncertainty reduction of the boundary positions ahead of the bit, which is crucial for geosteering decisions and reservoir mapping.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信