本科生对家庭健康指标的怀疑态度

Alberta Widya Kristanti, P. H. Sebong, A. Maharani
{"title":"本科生对家庭健康指标的怀疑态度","authors":"Alberta Widya Kristanti, P. H. Sebong, A. Maharani","doi":"10.24167/praxis.v5i1.4291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The application of PIS-PK indicators by medical students aims to train students ability to promote family health. However, the misinterpretation of the PIS-PK indicators by the students is an obstacle in the community-based learning model. This study aims to identify student misinterpretations related to PIS-PK indicators and we will provide recommendations to improve the instructions for filling out the PIS-PK indicator. Methods: This type of research is observational descriptive with a sample of 25 respondents who were recruited using purposive sampling technique. The research time is from September 2021 to October 2021. Data collection is through the google form questionnaire instrument which consists of 22 question items with closed ended questions, with 3 choice options. Results : Based on the analysis of the research results, the researchers found two indicators namely indicators 5 and 9 that were not clearly understood by the respondents. This could be due to respondents still in the early stages of exposure to these indicators or because the indicator formulas were inadequate. Overall, the PIS-PK indicators are easy to understand and can be digested well. Conclusion: There are 2 indicators that make students not understand the meaning of the statement, namely indicators 5 and 9. This indicator requires modification or addition of instructional information to make the meaning of the statement clearer. The level of difficulty and clarity of the PIS-PK indicators is good and quite easy for respondents to digest.","PeriodicalId":403309,"journal":{"name":"Praxis : Jurnal Sains, Teknologi, Masyarakat dan Jejaring","volume":"264 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identifikasi Misinterpretasi Mahasiswa Kedokteran Tentang Indikator Kesehatan Keluarga\",\"authors\":\"Alberta Widya Kristanti, P. H. Sebong, A. Maharani\",\"doi\":\"10.24167/praxis.v5i1.4291\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: The application of PIS-PK indicators by medical students aims to train students ability to promote family health. However, the misinterpretation of the PIS-PK indicators by the students is an obstacle in the community-based learning model. This study aims to identify student misinterpretations related to PIS-PK indicators and we will provide recommendations to improve the instructions for filling out the PIS-PK indicator. Methods: This type of research is observational descriptive with a sample of 25 respondents who were recruited using purposive sampling technique. The research time is from September 2021 to October 2021. Data collection is through the google form questionnaire instrument which consists of 22 question items with closed ended questions, with 3 choice options. Results : Based on the analysis of the research results, the researchers found two indicators namely indicators 5 and 9 that were not clearly understood by the respondents. This could be due to respondents still in the early stages of exposure to these indicators or because the indicator formulas were inadequate. Overall, the PIS-PK indicators are easy to understand and can be digested well. Conclusion: There are 2 indicators that make students not understand the meaning of the statement, namely indicators 5 and 9. This indicator requires modification or addition of instructional information to make the meaning of the statement clearer. The level of difficulty and clarity of the PIS-PK indicators is good and quite easy for respondents to digest.\",\"PeriodicalId\":403309,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Praxis : Jurnal Sains, Teknologi, Masyarakat dan Jejaring\",\"volume\":\"264 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Praxis : Jurnal Sains, Teknologi, Masyarakat dan Jejaring\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24167/praxis.v5i1.4291\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Praxis : Jurnal Sains, Teknologi, Masyarakat dan Jejaring","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24167/praxis.v5i1.4291","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:医学生应用PIS-PK指标的目的是培养学生促进家庭健康的能力。然而,学生对PIS-PK指标的误解是社区学习模式的障碍。本研究旨在找出学生对PIS-PK指标的误解,并提出改进PIS-PK指标填写说明的建议。方法:这种类型的研究是观察描述性的样本25受访者谁是招募使用有目的的抽样技术。研究时间为2021年9月至2021年10月。数据收集通过谷歌形式问卷调查工具,该工具由22个问题项组成,具有封闭式问题,有3个选项。结果:通过对研究结果的分析,研究人员发现了两个指标,即指标5和指标9,受访者对指标5和指标9的理解并不清楚。这可能是由于答复者仍处于接触这些指标的早期阶段,或者是因为指标公式不充分。总体而言,PIS-PK指标易于理解,易于消化。结论:有2个指标让学生不理解语句的意思,即指标5和9。这个指标需要修改或增加指导性信息,使语句的意思更清楚。PIS-PK指标的难度和清晰度都很好,很容易被受访者理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Identifikasi Misinterpretasi Mahasiswa Kedokteran Tentang Indikator Kesehatan Keluarga
Introduction: The application of PIS-PK indicators by medical students aims to train students ability to promote family health. However, the misinterpretation of the PIS-PK indicators by the students is an obstacle in the community-based learning model. This study aims to identify student misinterpretations related to PIS-PK indicators and we will provide recommendations to improve the instructions for filling out the PIS-PK indicator. Methods: This type of research is observational descriptive with a sample of 25 respondents who were recruited using purposive sampling technique. The research time is from September 2021 to October 2021. Data collection is through the google form questionnaire instrument which consists of 22 question items with closed ended questions, with 3 choice options. Results : Based on the analysis of the research results, the researchers found two indicators namely indicators 5 and 9 that were not clearly understood by the respondents. This could be due to respondents still in the early stages of exposure to these indicators or because the indicator formulas were inadequate. Overall, the PIS-PK indicators are easy to understand and can be digested well. Conclusion: There are 2 indicators that make students not understand the meaning of the statement, namely indicators 5 and 9. This indicator requires modification or addition of instructional information to make the meaning of the statement clearer. The level of difficulty and clarity of the PIS-PK indicators is good and quite easy for respondents to digest.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信